...(sorry for not quoting whole thing)
I am not the one that made a coin and ask you to invest in me... did I? Also, I didn't ask you for your real name, because that doesn't matter. The "team members" that are shown off on the other hand are important because they claim they have all these people working on it. But... in reality? Who knows? Probably one single person only? That's the point.
I am not the one that made a coin and ask you to invest in me... did I? Also, I didn't ask you for your real name, because that doesn't matter. The "team members" that are shown off on the other hand are important because they claim they have all these people working on it. But... in reality? Who knows? Probably one single person only? That's the point.
No one asks you to invest, invest if you feel comfortable, and if you evaluate the tech to be useful. If you think not knowing satoshi nakamotos real identity is ok, then it may follow that not knowing real identities of other developers is ok... From seeing a bunch of the devs talking to each other in the IRC, it would be hard for me to believe that they are all the same person, but I guess it could be possible?
Bitcoin is open source so the trust is in the source code. If Cloak was also completely open source so that we can trust on the code and not just on a claim, then yes their identity wouldn't matter. Without the source, then we have to trust on the developers, thus their identity and trustworthiness is really important.
Give it some time man. Think of Cloak as being alpha/beta testing. They are working on producing a final product that will eventually become open source. This is in the very early stages of the product. If you don't want to see the progress of the development of this coin, log off and never come back again.
You can't expect to give away the trade secrets right away, and produce an army of clones.
This is not normal sell! This coin will desapire real fast if continue to go down. For one day price is crashed for double! People, what to do?