Topic: [ANN] [CLOAK] Cloakcoin | No Premine | X13 | Decentralized Market and PoSA - page 265. (Read 1266559 times)
August 11, 2014, 02:04:40 AM
Don't sell cloak... Spread the atm cloak price to your friends circle try to purchase at cheap price.. Dagger will announce ASAP new news.. Trust cloak team and buy more
August 11, 2014, 01:55:20 AM
Im still up 400% and not selling anytime soon, purchasing small amounts on the dip..So much news still to come, you would have to be spastic to not see potential. Just wish I hadn't of purchased that dud shadowcoin during the hipe lol...NEVER TRADE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL!!!
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Broker-Sent-Oil-Prices-to-Eight-Month-High-in-a-Drunken-Stupor.html
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Broker-Sent-Oil-Prices-to-Eight-Month-High-in-a-Drunken-Stupor.html
Yeah I'm not selling either. The fact that this coin is tanking after the release of the groundbreaking technology that PoSA is is a disgrace and a threat for the altcoincommunity as a whole. How can we expect new money to enter this world if there is no respect for actual innovation, meaning any investment in any altcoin is a gamble for everyone except for the lucky few whales destroying crypto. We are witnesses of a turning point in history where the control of our money is taken out of the hands of governments and financial institutions, yet every step forward comes with a storm of FUD from the cryptocommunity itself, like a cancer growing inside it's own body.
This cryptocommunity is sick, yet I expect that cloak will rise the way it deserves after new technologies like block escrow and onemarket are released. If it doesn't, I will leave altcoins with my head up high since at least I'll have stood by something I truly believe in.
August 11, 2014, 01:42:52 AM
lol...NEVER TRADE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL!!!
+1
August 11, 2014, 01:37:12 AM
Im still up 400% and not selling anytime soon, purchasing small amounts on the dip..So much news still to come, you would have to be spastic to not see potential. Just wish I hadn't of purchased that dud shadowcoin during the hipe lol...NEVER TRADE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL!!!
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Broker-Sent-Oil-Prices-to-Eight-Month-High-in-a-Drunken-Stupor.html
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Broker-Sent-Oil-Prices-to-Eight-Month-High-in-a-Drunken-Stupor.html
August 11, 2014, 01:36:37 AM
yeah thinking 100k is new floor.
It can bleed to 30k-60k if there is still no promising updates or news from the devs and all it gets is a sea of FUD. Though fud is good though at least there is activity and someone still cares for the coin, unlike coins getting no hype or fud at all which is mostly headed to pure oblivion sub 10k or 1k satoshi.
Funny .. please read the thread in my signature. The Developer Team delivered as promised.
POSA News came.. drop by 100%.
FUD today... price increase a bit..
It seems like good news, well development and hitting ETA's don't bring anything. Crypto World is different.
Don't hit me with that but I remember Alty said Escrow the week after, so this week.
I am sure there will be an update on One Market this week as well ( with Update I mean hopefully a testing round with X11Joe)
Good that at the moment the coins hopefully going into the right pockets, still a lot of investors / believers here
+1
Waiting for a video then only investors are can understand about posa.. Dagger please release as soon as possible
August 11, 2014, 01:29:20 AM
It can bleed to 30k-60k if there is still no promising updates or news from the devs and all it gets is a sea of FUD. Though fud is good though at least there is activity and someone still cares for the coin, unlike coins getting no hype or fud at all which is mostly headed to pure oblivion sub 10k or 1k satoshi.
[/quote]
i would be surprised. this coin has not showed much down trending at all. if it drops below 94k you may be right (94k was lowest traded before the last big pump. but i dont expect the price to be at 100k for long
August 11, 2014, 01:25:39 AM
yeah thinking 100k is new floor.
It can bleed to 30k-60k if there is still no promising updates or news from the devs and all it gets is a sea of FUD. Though fud is good though at least there is activity and someone still cares for the coin, unlike coins getting no hype or fud at all which is mostly headed to pure oblivion sub 10k or 1k satoshi.
Funny .. please read the thread in my signature. The Developer Team delivered as promised.
POSA News came.. drop by 100%.
FUD today... price increase a bit..
It seems like good news, well development and hitting ETA's don't bring anything. Crypto World is different.
Don't hit me with that but I remember Alty said Escrow the week after, so this week.
I am sure there will be an update on One Market this week as well ( with Update I mean hopefully a testing round with X11Joe)
Good that at the moment the coins hopefully going into the right pockets, still a lot of investors / believers here
August 11, 2014, 01:15:51 AM
yeah thinking 100k is new floor.
It can bleed to 30k-60k if there is still no promising updates or news from the devs and all it gets is a sea of FUD. Though fud is good though at least there is activity and someone still cares for the coin, unlike coins getting no hype or fud at all which is mostly headed to pure oblivion sub 10k or 1k satoshi.
August 11, 2014, 01:06:42 AM
yeah thinking 100k is new floor.
Yea, could be temporarily used as a floor for a short-term bounce.
However, the recent price activity is hurting a lot the long-term potential of Cloak.
August 11, 2014, 12:59:01 AM
yeah thinking 100k is new floor.
August 11, 2014, 12:55:39 AM
Perhaps if a multipool gets set up it would move things in a good direction!
lol wut?
August 11, 2014, 12:54:48 AM
Perhaps if a multipool gets set up it would move things in a good direction!
August 11, 2014, 12:54:07 AM
This discussion won't matter much if the price continue to drop, it could get technically dangerous.
trying my best to hold it above 100k... doesnt seem to be working August 11, 2014, 12:32:48 AM
This discussion won't matter much if the price continue to drop, it could get technically dangerous.
August 11, 2014, 12:31:11 AM
quick question regard price action cloakheads..
anybody else thinking real support between 00065 - 0009??
anybody else thinking real support between 00065 - 0009??
August 11, 2014, 12:30:06 AM
[18:25] yes?
[18:25] hey man
[18:26] hey
[18:26] thx for coming
[18:26] thanks
[18:26] how did u find out that ip?
[18:26] or in other words how did you even think to try that IP?
[18:26] coz we are considering what all that shit can mean.. and we have strange thinks ;p
[18:26] flare on darkcointalk found it, it no longer works...it is an ip from a test net node
[18:26] cloak testnet
[18:26] i see
[18:27] yea i was thinking the same
[18:27] did u tried to google that ip?
[18:27] not yet
[18:27] can u link us to flare post?
[18:27] could you link us to the thread please
[18:28] https://darkcointalk.org/threads/cloaksend-2-0-posa-fake-or-legit.1868/page-3#post-15554
[18:28] thanks
[18:29] my thoughts are either the devs are also the mol devs, or someone in the private testing was the mol dev
[18:30] kk thank u for helps
[18:30] thanks for the clarification
[18:31] the ip also shows up is some old doge threads, just googled....
[18:31] who knows
[18:31] i see
[18:32] hmm i'll guess I'll have to spend some time on this
[18:33] i dont know what criteria there was for private testing,...im going to keep googling testnet ips and look for a pattern
[18:34] I'll try that too
[18:34] k
[18:49] so it looks like this is a digital ocean ip, and its been used as a seed node in a bunch of cryptos, mol, qrk, V, plus a russian shibe thread
[18:50] lol what does it mean?
[18:51] A: ?
[18:51] someone set up an instance with digital ocean to act as a seed for these coins. Looks like a cloak node was setup there as well. the name registration on the ip may just be a coincidence
[18:52] the same person?
[18:52] that i dont know
[18:52] is there a posibility that were diffrent people?
[18:52] yes
[18:52] how?
[18:52] are the servers at digital ocean Virtual machines?
[18:53] yes, vm's, digital ocean is popular, so its possible two unreleated users ended up with the same ip months apart. I just think the fact that this ips is being used repeatedly for seed nodes is unusual, unless the ip is static and continuous managed by a single person
[18:54] if thats the case, the ip is static for a long run instance, it means a single person is behind all these nodes
[18:55] ya
[18:55] wondering if we could ask digital ocean how they deal with IPs
[18:56] it would probably be on their site, static ip would be a popular option
[18:56] I'll take a look
[18:56] solved....
[18:57] what for this
[18:57] wait
[18:57] ....
[18:57] https://who.is/whois/blocks.moleculecoin.com
[18:58] that.. doesnt give us any hint i think?
[18:58] its panama...
[18:58] or i am wrong?
[18:59] ok i might have jumped the gun
[18:59] https://who.is/whois/cloakcoin.com
[18:59] both identicle, but its the same company, whois guard
[19:00] its namecheap?
[19:00] or namecheap is only registrator?
[19:00] and panama is the buyer?
[19:00] its whois guarded
[19:00] http://www.enom.com
[19:01] was used to register both domains
[19:01] but reseller is namecheap?
[19:01] https://www.namecheap.com/legal/whoisguard/whoisguard-agreement.aspx
[19:02] namecheap is the reseller of the whois guarded thing i think
[19:02] yes, my point was there is another coincidence
[19:04] ya
[19:04] the ip also shows in the code for version coin, and versioncoin.com was also registered with enom.com
[19:05] it looks like the same group, using the same services for multiple coins
[19:06] yup
[19:07] thats not good
[19:07] digital ocean confirms static ip
[19:07] https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/are-digital-ocean-s-ip-addresses-static
[19:08] but diffrent vm can get same ip as well?
[19:08] but they are static
[19:08] i dont think so
[19:11] who wants to paste this into the cloak thread
[19:12] dont
[19:12] haha
[19:12] one sec
[19:12] checking other coins too
[19:13] lol
[19:14] i dont hold any cloak, i got out of a small position at 0.002, it just smells bad to me
[19:14] can you keep this between us for now, doing whois lookups on other shitcoins
[19:15] yes
[19:15] i am tryign to contact digital ocean
[19:15] to find out about ips
[19:16] i posted a link above
[19:16] nyway ti dont see livechat there ;/
[19:17] https://who.is/whois/antimatter.cc
[19:17] https://who.is/whois/versioncoin.com
[19:17] https://who.is/whois/cloakcoin.com
[19:18] https://who.is/domain-history/moleculecoin.com
[19:18] https://who.is/whois/atocoin.com
[19:18] https://who.is/whois/vault-coin.com
[19:18] thats a lot of shit coins to be registered by a single provider
[19:18] https://who.is/whois/libertycoin.co/
[19:19] looking for more
[19:24] you guys find anymore?
[19:24] not yet
[19:25] i am trying to reach same ip case
[19:25] http://www.whois.com/whois/fireflycoin.com
[19:26] https://who.is/whois/probecoin.com
[19:27] https://who.is/whois/theshibecoin.com
[19:27] ok so what are the odds that entirely different devs used the same site to register these domains...shibecoin.com is on digital ocean aswell
[19:28] it is possible ever to find same pattern in diffrent pack of coins?
[19:29] the other coins ive check use godaddy or random companies
[19:29] digital is used for many peoples
[19:29] by*
[19:29] ya found some godaddy but godaddy is very popular
[19:29] buy u mean same ip as well?
[19:29] but*
[19:30] yes that was my original point, digital ocean is used by many people, but the same ip at digital ocean is linked to multiple coins, which are linked to the same registrar, it looks like the same group
[19:31] lets say registration is pretty anon
[19:31] coz it could be paid by btc as i remember right?
[19:31] what about digital? is there way to pay anonymously for that service?
[19:31] it could be anyone, but it looks everything is channeled through a common link
[19:34] nop enom only accepts credit cards just tried buying a domain
[19:35] but namecheap
[19:35] allows btc
[19:36] let me see
[19:36] https://www.namecheap.com/support/payment/bitcoin.aspx
[19:37] but did they register the domain at namecheap or at enom? seems they paid for the whois guard service offered from namecheap
[19:37] thats what i think, enom is listed primarily
[19:38] for me its looks like that namecheap bought domen from enom
[19:38] but i dont really know how buying domens works
[19:39] Domain Name: CLOAKCOIN.COM Registrar: ENOM, INC. Whois Server: whois.enom.com Referral URL: http://www.enom.com
[19:40] http://www.webhosting.info/registrars/reports/total_domains/ENOM.COM
[19:41] enom owns 8% of the market, so it is unlikely that random people all used enom. It is more likely a single person who is used to them used it
[19:42] found this: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1111525
[19:43] and this: http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/617450-difference-between-enom-namecheap-i-need-some-help.html
[19:45] http://www.warriorforum.com/main-internet-marketing-discussion-forum/940369-namecheap-still-reseller-enom.html
[19:46] might explain it more clearly here: http://davezan.com/does-enom-own-namecheap.html
[19:48] check the whois of the sites for various coins i listed
[19:48] reseller: Namecheap
[19:48] well i think its likely that some of those shit coins are coincidence, but we can definitley link cloak, molecule, and shibe to the same static ip
[19:50] might be a coincidence too
[19:50] but this is what concerns me
[19:50] look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=478176.60
[19:50] check this post out
[19:51] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5454949
[19:51] and versioncoin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5454949
[19:51] notice anything?
[19:51] thats got me wondering
[19:51] yep we both posted the same thing
[19:51] a hard coded node
[19:51] lol ya
[19:51] ya
[19:52] the first one before the source was even pushed onto github
[19:52] not even
[19:52] so there's some possibilities here
[19:52] so you think we uncovered a massive shit coin operation or what?
[19:52] not sure
[19:52] we have some theories
[19:53] either
[19:53] one of the devs or someone in the private testing of PosA was a former dev
[19:53] yes i think thats clear
[19:53] and used their server as a testnet node
[19:54] or the server is Alty's
[19:54] wish I could find out the entire list of tests on testnet
[19:54] link bct usernames, go through their posts
[19:55] i am
[19:55] lets say that ip were to get ddosed what would happen?
[19:58] i guess nothing seeing that the server must of been shutdown
[19:58] staycrypto, who hardcoded the ip into version coin, also worked with cagecoin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5397476
[19:59] his last post was in april
[20:00] i see
[20:00] that blocks.moleculecoin.com is that block exxplorer?
[20:02] checked molecule's thread that link is no where to be seen
[20:02] i dont know, its offline, yes i cant find it either
[20:03] gf, what about molecu coin ? i saw same ip somewhere there anything more?
[20:04] no the server was shutdown
[20:04] what bothers me more is that MrRGnome wouldn't answer about the image when someone asked
[20:04] like he intentionally ignored it and changed the subject
[20:05] your post was erased
[20:05] he is in main dev team?
[20:05] or second one?
[20:05] i deleted it
[20:05] oh ok, i didnt see it at all, i noticed you were the most recent message, but i didnt read it
[20:06] i was going to try and explain why that showed up but after googling my answer would be wrong
[20:08] in the irc
[20:09] other he knows more about that from inside or other he is fucked up with all fud that comes into irc/thread
[20:09] anyway sb turn off server/node minutes after u A put screen on btcthread
[20:09] yes i noticed that
[20:10] thats what i can't seem to forget
[20:10] i am curious how drk's dev find it out
[20:11] he must of been trying to check PoSA out, turned to test net to see the peers
[20:12] tested the IPs one by one until getting a hit on one of them
[20:13] im going to nslookup current nodes and see if anything is registered
[20:13] to connect to testnet
[20:14] <@MrRGnome> Huge difference between an actual concern about the protocol and a logline in a pic
[20:14] only response to that image
[20:14] i need to put testnet=1?
[20:14] after that a whole new discussion started
[20:14] in conf file?
[20:15] eh i should make a coffee
[20:17] i got into testnet should it start getting peers automatically that are still in the testnet?
[20:18] if wallet will find it yes
[20:18] k
[20:18] but i am not sure if wallet will find any
[20:18] 95.85.37.194 = dogesms.com
[20:19] A: its from node lists?
[20:19] yes, mainnet
[20:19] tbh it can be anyone
[20:19] but i will find if this page is scam or sth
[20:19] godaddy
[20:20] Juha Kovanen
[20:20] anyone faimilar?
[20:22] probably just a regular node, we need to find an ip thats linked directly to a coin
[20:22] maybe check the node list at the block explorer
[20:23] there are like 70 or 100+ ip addreses http://cloak.blockexplorer.cc/nodes/
[20:23] ya maybe look at the .33 ones possibly?
[20:23] yes ive gone though about 30
[20:24] ok lets split tje job
[20:24] just check them in google?
[20:24] or same as in screen drk devs did?
[20:25] k
[20:25] brb got to grab something to eat
[20:26] so nslookup ip googlednd?
[20:26] dns*
[20:26] heres one
[20:26] https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/11782-slimcoin-slm-information/
[20:26] one of the original slimcoin nodes is now a cloak node
[20:26] 107.181.250.216
[20:27] \https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-test-rc2-forking-issues.1009/page-43
[20:27] https://bitcointa.lk/threads/ann-slimcoin-proof-of-burn-new-block-gen-mineable-by-low-power-computer.315729/
[20:27] also here ^^
[20:28] its just a regular pc or vm for wallets probally
[20:29] nah
[20:29] its tor exit node
[20:29] http://cy-int.com/records
[20:29] yes there are a lot of exit nodes on the list
[20:30] can it be connected with tor "anon"for cloak wallet?
[20:30] like we should see tor nodes in tor way of addresses?
[20:32] i dont know
[20:33] tor no matter if its safe or not, but many peoples still uses it to create feeling of anon
[20:38] was anyone able to connect to any testnet nodes? im not finding any
[20:39] i am trying atm
[20:39] with standart node list
[20:39] standard*
[20:39] but so far no connection
[20:43] same as mine
[20:44] saem here doesnt connect
[20:45] maybe we need to use a different version
[20:48] 146.185.149.201 is a seed node for version coin, nslookup shows woof.moonmooncoin.com a particle block explorer
[20:50] 162.243.234.210 is both seed2.versioncoin.com and seed.moleculecoin.com
[20:51] and appear also at atomcoin
[20:51] and shibe
[20:51] and again its digital ocean
[20:51] yes digital ocean
[20:54] eh i am really fuckin confused right now
[20:59] I think the evidence is pretty clear, devs from different coins have been colluding for a while now, or its the same group
[21:00] yea:/
[21:04] sad
[21:04] i guess that explains why everything was open sourced
[21:04] devs not revealing themselves
[21:05] wondering if PoSA is real or not
[21:05] or onemarket for that matter
[21:17] a coin coin seed 37.59.21.199 also points to www.verters.com vertcoin
[21:17] jade coin
[18:25]
[18:26] hey
[18:26]
[18:26] thanks
[18:26]
[18:26] or in other words how did you even think to try that IP?
[18:26]
[18:26] flare on darkcointalk found it, it no longer works...it is an ip from a test net node
[18:26] cloak testnet
[18:26] i see
[18:27]
[18:27]
[18:27] not yet
[18:27]
[18:27] could you link us to the thread please
[18:28] https://darkcointalk.org/threads/cloaksend-2-0-posa-fake-or-legit.1868/page-3#post-15554
[18:28] thanks
[18:29] my thoughts are either the devs are also the mol devs, or someone in the private testing was the mol dev
[18:30]
[18:30] thanks for the clarification
[18:31] the ip also shows up is some old doge threads, just googled....
[18:31] who knows
[18:31] i see
[18:32] hmm i'll guess I'll have to spend some time on this
[18:33] i dont know what criteria there was for private testing,...im going to keep googling testnet ips and look for a pattern
[18:34] I'll try that too
[18:34] k
[18:49] so it looks like this is a digital ocean ip, and its been used as a seed node in a bunch of cryptos, mol, qrk, V, plus a russian shibe thread
[18:50]
[18:51]
[18:51] someone set up an instance with digital ocean to act as a seed for these coins. Looks like a cloak node was setup there as well. the name registration on the ip may just be a coincidence
[18:52]
[18:52] that i dont know
[18:52]
[18:52] yes
[18:52]
[18:52] are the servers at digital ocean Virtual machines?
[18:53] yes, vm's, digital ocean is popular, so its possible two unreleated users ended up with the same ip months apart. I just think the fact that this ips is being used repeatedly for seed nodes is unusual, unless the ip is static and continuous managed by a single person
[18:54] if thats the case, the ip is static for a long run instance, it means a single person is behind all these nodes
[18:55] ya
[18:55] wondering if we could ask digital ocean how they deal with IPs
[18:56] it would probably be on their site, static ip would be a popular option
[18:56] I'll take a look
[18:56] solved....
[18:57] what for this
[18:57] wait
[18:57] ....
[18:57] https://who.is/whois/blocks.moleculecoin.com
[18:58]
[18:58]
[18:58]
[18:59] ok i might have jumped the gun
[18:59] https://who.is/whois/cloakcoin.com
[18:59] both identicle, but its the same company, whois guard
[19:00]
[19:00]
[19:00]
[19:00] its whois guarded
[19:00] http://www.enom.com
[19:01] was used to register both domains
[19:01]
[19:01]
[19:02] namecheap is the reseller of the whois guarded thing i think
[19:02] yes, my point was there is another coincidence
[19:04] ya
[19:04] the ip also shows in the code for version coin, and versioncoin.com was also registered with enom.com
[19:05] it looks like the same group, using the same services for multiple coins
[19:06] yup
[19:07] thats not good
[19:07] digital ocean confirms static ip
[19:07] https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/are-digital-ocean-s-ip-addresses-static
[19:08]
[19:08] but they are static
[19:08] i dont think so
[19:11] who wants to paste this into the cloak thread
[19:12]
[19:12] haha
[19:12] one sec
[19:12] checking other coins too
[19:13]
[19:14] i dont hold any cloak, i got out of a small position at 0.002, it just smells bad to me
[19:14] can you keep this between us for now, doing whois lookups on other shitcoins
[19:15] yes
[19:15]
[19:15]
[19:16] i posted a link above
[19:16]
[19:17] https://who.is/whois/antimatter.cc
[19:17] https://who.is/whois/versioncoin.com
[19:17] https://who.is/whois/cloakcoin.com
[19:18] https://who.is/domain-history/moleculecoin.com
[19:18] https://who.is/whois/atocoin.com
[19:18] https://who.is/whois/vault-coin.com
[19:18] thats a lot of shit coins to be registered by a single provider
[19:18] https://who.is/whois/libertycoin.co/
[19:19] looking for more
[19:24] you guys find anymore?
[19:24] not yet
[19:25]
[19:25] http://www.whois.com/whois/fireflycoin.com
[19:26] https://who.is/whois/probecoin.com
[19:27] https://who.is/whois/theshibecoin.com
[19:27] ok so what are the odds that entirely different devs used the same site to register these domains...shibecoin.com is on digital ocean aswell
[19:28]
[19:29] the other coins ive check use godaddy or random companies
[19:29]
[19:29]
[19:29] ya found some godaddy but godaddy is very popular
[19:29]
[19:29]
[19:30] yes that was my original point, digital ocean is used by many people, but the same ip at digital ocean is linked to multiple coins, which are linked to the same registrar, it looks like the same group
[19:31]
[19:31]
[19:31]
[19:31] it could be anyone, but it looks everything is channeled through a common link
[19:34] nop enom only accepts credit cards just tried buying a domain
[19:35]
[19:35]
[19:36] let me see
[19:36]
[19:37] but did they register the domain at namecheap or at enom? seems they paid for the whois guard service offered from namecheap
[19:37] thats what i think, enom is listed primarily
[19:38]
[19:38]
[19:39] Domain Name: CLOAKCOIN.COM Registrar: ENOM, INC. Whois Server: whois.enom.com Referral URL: http://www.enom.com
[19:40] http://www.webhosting.info/registrars/reports/total_domains/ENOM.COM
[19:41] enom owns 8% of the market, so it is unlikely that random people all used enom. It is more likely a single person who is used to them used it
[19:42] found this: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1111525
[19:43] and this: http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/617450-difference-between-enom-namecheap-i-need-some-help.html
[19:45] http://www.warriorforum.com/main-internet-marketing-discussion-forum/940369-namecheap-still-reseller-enom.html
[19:46] might explain it more clearly here: http://davezan.com/does-enom-own-namecheap.html
[19:48] check the whois of the sites for various coins i listed
[19:48] reseller: Namecheap
[19:48] well i think its likely that some of those shit coins are coincidence, but we can definitley link cloak, molecule, and shibe to the same static ip
[19:50] might be a coincidence too
[19:50] but this is what concerns me
[19:50] look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=478176.60
[19:50] check this post out
[19:51] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5454949
[19:51] and versioncoin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5454949
[19:51] notice anything?
[19:51] thats got me wondering
[19:51] yep we both posted the same thing
[19:51] a hard coded node
[19:51] lol ya
[19:51] ya
[19:52] the first one before the source was even pushed onto github
[19:52] not even
[19:52] so there's some possibilities here
[19:52] so you think we uncovered a massive shit coin operation or what?
[19:52] not sure
[19:52] we have some theories
[19:53] either
[19:53] one of the devs or someone in the private testing of PosA was a former dev
[19:53] yes i think thats clear
[19:53] and used their server as a testnet node
[19:54] or the server is Alty's
[19:54] wish I could find out the entire list of tests on testnet
[19:54] link bct usernames, go through their posts
[19:55] i am
[19:55] lets say that ip were to get ddosed what would happen?
[19:58] i guess nothing seeing that the server must of been shutdown
[19:58] staycrypto, who hardcoded the ip into version coin, also worked with cagecoin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5397476
[19:59] his last post was in april
[20:00] i see
[20:00] that blocks.moleculecoin.com is that block exxplorer?
[20:02] checked molecule's thread that link is no where to be seen
[20:02] i dont know, its offline, yes i cant find it either
[20:03]
[20:04] no the server was shutdown
[20:04] what bothers me more is that MrRGnome wouldn't answer about the image when someone asked
[20:04] like he intentionally ignored it and changed the subject
[20:05] your post was erased
[20:05]
[20:05]
[20:05] i deleted it
[20:05] oh ok, i didnt see it at all, i noticed you were the most recent message, but i didnt read it
[20:06] i was going to try and explain why that showed up but after googling my answer would be wrong
[20:08] in the irc
[20:09]
[20:09]
[20:09] yes i noticed that
[20:10] thats what i can't seem to forget
[20:10]
[20:11] he must of been trying to check PoSA out, turned to test net to see the peers
[20:12] tested the IPs one by one until getting a hit on one of them
[20:13] im going to nslookup current nodes and see if anything is registered
[20:13]
[20:14] <@MrRGnome> Huge difference between an actual concern about the protocol and a logline in a pic
[20:14] only response to that image
[20:14]
[20:14] after that a whole new discussion started
[20:14]
[20:15]
[20:17] i got into testnet should it start getting peers automatically that are still in the testnet?
[20:18]
[20:18] k
[20:18]
[20:18] 95.85.37.194 = dogesms.com
[20:19]
[20:19] yes, mainnet
[20:19]
[20:19]
[20:19]
[20:20] Juha Kovanen
[20:20] anyone faimilar?
[20:22] probably just a regular node, we need to find an ip thats linked directly to a coin
[20:22] maybe check the node list at the block explorer
[20:23]
[20:23] ya maybe look at the .33 ones possibly?
[20:23] yes ive gone though about 30
[20:24]
[20:24]
[20:24]
[20:25] k
[20:25] brb got to grab something to eat
[20:26]
[20:26]
[20:26] heres one
[20:26] https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/11782-slimcoin-slm-information/
[20:26] one of the original slimcoin nodes is now a cloak node
[20:26] 107.181.250.216
[20:27]
[20:27] https://bitcointa.lk/threads/ann-slimcoin-proof-of-burn-new-block-gen-mineable-by-low-power-computer.315729/
[20:27]
[20:28]
[20:29]
[20:29]
[20:29]
[20:29] yes there are a lot of exit nodes on the list
[20:30]
[20:30]
[20:32] i dont know
[20:33]
[20:38] was anyone able to connect to any testnet nodes? im not finding any
[20:39]
[20:39]
[20:39]
[20:39]
[20:43] same as mine
[20:44] saem here doesnt connect
[20:45] maybe we need to use a different version
[20:48] 146.185.149.201 is a seed node for version coin, nslookup shows woof.moonmooncoin.com a particle block explorer
[20:50] 162.243.234.210 is both seed2.versioncoin.com and seed.moleculecoin.com
[20:51]
[20:51]
[20:51]
[20:51] yes digital ocean
[20:54]
[20:59] I think the evidence is pretty clear, devs from different coins have been colluding for a while now, or its the same group
[21:00]
[21:04] sad
[21:04] i guess that explains why everything was open sourced
[21:04] devs not revealing themselves
[21:05] wondering if PoSA is real or not
[21:05] or onemarket for that matter
[21:17] a coin coin seed 37.59.21.199 also points to www.verters.com vertcoin
[21:17] jade coin
August 11, 2014, 12:23:51 AM
this thread turning into bagholders crying about whales manipulation... doesn't sound good
who is crying? the whales have done nothing but get this coin noticed and have made anyone who doesnt have a shakey hand many btc... "if you build it, they will come" this is the perfect time to pick up a few cheap cloaks. August 11, 2014, 12:15:54 AM
this thread turning into bagholders crying about whales manipulation... doesn't sound good
I got some great advice. Buy more so the price goes down slower.
no thanks i see countless post saying 120-130K is support lvl, it's now lower then that....
August 11, 2014, 12:09:36 AM
this thread turning into bagholders crying about whales manipulation... doesn't sound good
I got some great advice. Buy more so the price goes down slower.
August 11, 2014, 12:06:19 AM
this thread turning into bagholders crying about whales manipulation... doesn't sound good
Jump to: