Author

Topic: [ANN] [CLOAK] Cloakcoin | No Premine | X13 | Decentralized Market and PoSA - page 571. (Read 1266568 times)

newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
I've finally managed to get my wallet to sync but it won't acknowledge my transactions as a part of my balance (it is currently at 0.00). Is there anything I can do to get my wallet to recognize my balance.

type repairwallet in console

Thanks, it worked. Almost killed myself a couple times after I thought I lost 700 Cloak.
sr. member
Activity: 578
Merit: 250
Damn..
We where on such a nice ride.. PoSA that was announced, wallet upgrades, promised marketing.. I do believe that this devs are working very hard to get these things done, tough till today we as holders only hearing that these things are comming, and our  coin is nothing different from other altcoins now..

I disagree, we already have features already live that set us apart from other altcoins including:  Unique anon that doesn't utilize coinjoin, exchange trading built into the wallet.
sr. member
Activity: 578
Merit: 250
we need some statement from developers ...

We know, that PoW method is secure, but what about PoS ? i am only hoping, that is not fud created for marketing


Some info from relevant person... is cloak solving this problem ? new patch is solving this ?

dont expect more investors, if this questions are here..  obversely i am now thinking about pull off my investments from PoS coins..

I think that's not the problem. It's all because A bunch of greedy people/day-traders putting their coins on exchange hoping to make money in a short period of time. What if they put the coins in their wallets and staking to secure the blockchain? Hark fork will definitely be not going to happen.

i think cryptoyeah has a valid point.  a good time for those in the team to step up and give information, especially given the unresolved POS flaw that they say they have discovered. yea sure all the koolaid drinkers will give me shit again. but i have run a number of startups in my time and communication is critical. a few moments of clear communication gives huge benefits. so all y'all who are getting ready to type "leave the developers alone", save it. communication is an essential part of any nascent business.

especially now. the cloak team could be communicating in a way that is positive, supportive of vrc, and clearing up the many questions that are being posed. and winning the PR game in the process.

people keep talking about the opportunities to market this coin and build a solid public image. here is a huge opportunity. the excuse that the core team is too busy with important things to weigh in does not cut it imho.

ok. cue hating responses.



No hate here, I agree that communication is vital to Cloak's success so would love to hear from the devs about the ongoing VRC situation.  With that being said, Dagger has done a great job thus far with keeping the community informed.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Damn..
We where on such a nice ride.. PoSA that was announced, wallet upgrades, promised marketing.. I do believe that this devs are working very hard to get these things done, tough till today we as holders only hearing that these things are comming, and our  coin is nothing different from other altcoins now..
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
I've finally managed to get my wallet to sync but it won't acknowledge my transactions as a part of my balance (it is currently at 0.00). Is there anything I can do to get my wallet to recognize my balance.

type repairwallet in console
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
we need some statement from developers ...

We know, that PoW method is secure, but what about PoS ? i am only hoping, that is not fud created for marketing


Some info from relevant person... is cloak solving this problem ? new patch is solving this ?

dont expect more investors, if this questions are here..  obversely i am now thinking about pull off my investments from PoS coins..

I think that's not the problem. It's all because A bunch of greedy people/day-traders putting their coins on exchange hoping to make money in a short period of time. What if they put the coins in their wallets and staking to secure the blockchain? Hark fork will definitely be not going to happen.

i think cryptoyeah has a valid point.  a good time for those in the team to step up and give information, especially given the unresolved POS flaw that they say they have discovered. yea sure all the koolaid drinkers will give me shit again. but i have run a number of startups in my time and communication is critical. a few moments of clear communication gives huge benefits. so all y'all who are getting ready to type "leave the developers alone", save it. communication is an essential part of any nascent business.

especially now. the cloak team could be communicating in a way that is positive, supportive of vrc, and clearing up the many questions that are being posed. and winning the PR game in the process.

people keep talking about the opportunities to market this coin and build a solid public image. here is a huge opportunity. the excuse that the core team is too busy with important things to weigh in does not cut it imho.

ok. cue hating responses.

newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
I've finally managed to get my wallet to sync but it won't acknowledge my transactions as a part of my balance (it is currently at 0.00). Is there anything I can do to get my wallet to recognize my balance.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
we need some statement from developers ...

We know, that PoW method is secure, but what about PoS ? i am only hoping, that is not fud created for marketing


Some info from relevant person... is cloak solving this problem ? new patch is solving this ?

dont expect more investors, if this questions are here..  obversely i am now thinking about pull off my investments from PoS coins..

I think that's not the problem. It's all because A bunch of greedy people/day-traders putting their coins on exchange hoping to make money in a short period of time. What if they put the coins in their wallets and staking to secure the blockchain? Hark fork will definitely be not going to happen.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
wallet 169 crashing every two hours or so. debug file shows long list of orphaned blocks, ending in "ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake ...." which results in crash. when wallet restarts, no stake.

any ideas what this is?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
It wasn't a POS attack !!!!!! Mintpal was hacked
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
we need some statement from developers ...

We know, that PoW method is secure, but what about PoS ? i am only hoping, that is not fud created for marketing


Some info from relevant person... is cloak solving this problem ? new patch is solving this ?

dont expect more investors, if this questions are here..  obversely i am now thinking about pull off my investments from PoS coins..
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I keep wondering whether this was the PoS problem the CLOAK team has fixed with the last patch...
If it in fact was then thumbs up for the CLOAK dev team.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
so, the question of "what security risk" is involved in POS coins that every coin is susceptible to just got answered in the most brutal way possible.
?

VRC 51% attack just became a very real scenario, they don't need half the coins... just half the staking amount, of which more than 51% was stolen. I cant say whether that is the problem cloakdevs fixed or not, but I imagine it has something to do with that. It's at least a sobering reminder to keep your coins in your wallet...

Where did these details come from?

check the VRC thread?

wow. scary reading.

ya sick shit indeed , i wrote a week ago on there thread about 51% attack but everyone laughted at me

I think it's 8 million coins.  Not enough for 51% attack.  But, enough to cause some bad problems. Their hard fork roll back idea is a very risky move and likely will cause some bad problems by itself.  They're in a really bad spot I'm afraid.

Nope PoS attack can happen if someone holds more than 51% of the staking coins not the total no of coins.

In this case it is highly possible to happen.



It wasn't POS attack, more like mtgox attack
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
so, the question of "what security risk" is involved in POS coins that every coin is susceptible to just got answered in the most brutal way possible.
?

VRC 51% attack just became a very real scenario, they don't need half the coins... just half the staking amount, of which more than 51% was stolen. I cant say whether that is the problem cloakdevs fixed or not, but I imagine it has something to do with that. It's at least a sobering reminder to keep your coins in your wallet...

Where did these details come from?

check the VRC thread?

wow. scary reading.

ya sick shit indeed , i wrote a week ago on there thread about 51% attack but everyone laughted at me

I think it's 8 million coins.  Not enough for 51% attack.  But, enough to cause some bad problems. Their hard fork roll back idea is a very risky move and likely will cause some bad problems by itself.  They're in a really bad spot I'm afraid.

Nope PoS attack can happen if someone holds more than 51% of the staking coins not the total no of coins.

In this case it is highly possible to happen.


sr. member
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
so, the question of "what security risk" is involved in POS coins that every coin is susceptible to just got answered in the most brutal way possible.
?

VRC 51% attack just became a very real scenario, they don't need half the coins... just half the staking amount, of which more than 51% was stolen. I cant say whether that is the problem cloakdevs fixed or not, but I imagine it has something to do with that. It's at least a sobering reminder to keep your coins in your wallet...

Where did these details come from?

check the VRC thread?

wow. scary reading.

ya sick shit indeed , i wrote a week ago on there thread about 51% attack but everyone laughted at me

I think it's 8 million coins.  Not enough for 51% attack.  But, enough to cause some bad problems. Their hard fork roll back idea is a very risky move and likely will cause some bad problems by itself.  They're in a really bad spot I'm afraid.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
so, the question of "what security risk" is involved in POS coins that every coin is susceptible to just got answered in the most brutal way possible.
?

VRC 51% attack just became a very real scenario, they don't need half the coins... just half the staking amount, of which more than 51% was stolen. I cant say whether that is the problem cloakdevs fixed or not, but I imagine it has something to do with that. It's at least a sobering reminder to keep your coins in your wallet...

Where did these details come from?

check the VRC thread?

wow. scary reading.

ya sick shit indeed , i wrote a week ago on there thread about 51% attack but everyone laughted at me
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
i just updated my wallet to v1.9.6.0

i have 0 active connection Huh

Download the nodes in the block explorer and put the conf file in the %appdata% Cloakcoin


Excuse my stupidity, but where is the %appdata% folder?

C:\Users\YourUserName\AppData\Roaming\CloakCoin

Mac, please?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
i just updated my wallet to v1.9.6.0

i have 0 active connection Huh

Download the nodes in the block explorer and put the conf file in the %appdata% Cloakcoin


Excuse my stupidity, but where is the %appdata% folder?

C:\Users\YourUserName\AppData\Roaming\CloakCoin
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
i just updated my wallet to v1.9.6.0

i have 0 active connection Huh

Download the nodes in the block explorer and put the conf file in the %appdata% Cloakcoin


Excuse my stupidity, but where is the %appdata% folder?
Jump to: