Topic: » [ANN] COINCLEAN.CC - TAINT PROOF BITCOIN MIXING SERVICE - WITH DEVELOPER API « (Read 4060 times)
March 23, 2014, 02:06:28 PM
It doesn't work now.
March 17, 2014, 01:46:47 PM
How many coins do you currently have that are used for mixing?
Anyone here vouch for using this service for at least a couple coins?
Anyone here vouch for using this service for at least a couple coins?
Hello,
our reserves are splitted on many cold / hot wallets, we can guarantee 100% anonymity, we have stored more then XXXX coins.
We apologize for server issues. We have some problems with our hoster, which will be fixed within the next 24 hours.
Thank you!
March 16, 2014, 09:18:26 PM
How many coins do you currently have that are used for mixing?
Anyone here vouch for using this service for at least a couple coins?
Anyone here vouch for using this service for at least a couple coins?
March 16, 2014, 09:07:45 PM
I used this service to clean 0.01 BTC successfully, it's great.
March 16, 2014, 12:32:45 PM
I thought the service was great and very fast. I can't confirm this every time, but the whole process took less than 30 minutes from start to finish. Would definitely use again!
Thank you!
Indeed I agree with TheButterZone
As I said is there no solution for this problem, otherwise we had to log more information at the expenses of your anonymity. The Verifier is just a quick "inspection" tool, based on the Blockchain.info taint analysis. If everyone say, that the verifier is needless, we could consider about remove him.
March 16, 2014, 12:19:08 PM
Indeed I agree with TheButterZone
March 16, 2014, 11:13:37 AM
I thought the service was great and very fast. I can't confirm this every time, but the whole process took less than 30 minutes from start to finish. Would definitely use again!
March 16, 2014, 04:57:58 AM
Then maybe it's just me, but I can't trust it alone as a taint analysis tool, and think everyone would be better off using blockchain.info or other live-updating block explorers to actually analyze taint instead of just being given a boilerplate automatic confirmation of "Successfull tumble" (when no tumble has in fact been executed).
That you even have to argue these details with anyone on this topic or anywhere else, means your site (verify.html and faq.html in particular) is not sufficiently clear.
That you even have to argue these details with anyone on this topic or anywhere else, means your site (verify.html and faq.html in particular) is not sufficiently clear.
Hello TheButterZone,
as we said in our FAQ you should check the taint with multiple blockexplorers / tools, so that you can go sure, that everything went fine
Thank you for the feedback!
March 15, 2014, 04:12:21 PM
Then maybe it's just me, but I can't trust it alone as a taint analysis tool, and think everyone would be better off using blockchain.info or other live-updating block explorers to actually analyze taint instead of just being given a boilerplate automatic confirmation of "Successfull tumble" (when no tumble has in fact been executed).
That you even have to argue these details with anyone on this topic or anywhere else, means your site (verify.html and faq.html in particular) is not sufficiently clear.
That you even have to argue these details with anyone on this topic or anywhere else, means your site (verify.html and faq.html in particular) is not sufficiently clear.
March 15, 2014, 06:58:43 AM
Ok, just correct the typo and don't let it say that a tumble has occurred before the destination address has been tumbled into.
Hello,
because we don't log / record everything, we can't attach something like this. Sorry.
March 15, 2014, 05:15:57 AM
Ok, just correct the typo and don't let it say that a tumble has occurred before the destination address has been tumbled into.
March 15, 2014, 04:39:15 AM
I used the 0.01 BTC provided to me by CoinClean to test their own service. After my destination address received 0.00995 BTC, I searched its received (origin) taint analysis on blockchain.info for both my from address and CoinClean's original from address. Neither were there, so it was an effective mixing.
However, the status page http://coinclean.cc/verify.html said "Successfull tumble" (typo: successful) almost immediately after I sent to CoinClean's mixing address, even though my original TX took +2,859 minutes to be included in a block (I didn't include a fee because Electrum didn't say I had to). So, until verify.html is fixed, I wouldn't depend on it for status updates - only the blockchain itself.
However, the status page http://coinclean.cc/verify.html said "Successfull tumble" (typo: successful) almost immediately after I sent to CoinClean's mixing address, even though my original TX took +2,859 minutes to be included in a block (I didn't include a fee because Electrum didn't say I had to). So, until verify.html is fixed, I wouldn't depend on it for status updates - only the blockchain itself.
Hello TheButterZone,
the verifier is working just like the Blockchain.info taint analysis tool. Everybody can check two addresses with our verifier, and if there is no relationshop between eachother, the verifier will output a "Successfull tumble". You have to use the verifier after you've received your Bitcoins. Otherwise it makes no sense.
So our verifier is just a taint analysis tool, you can check every address there, not just addresses used with our service.
Thank you for your feedback!
March 14, 2014, 04:29:06 PM
I used the 0.01 BTC provided to me by CoinClean to test their own service. After my destination address received 0.00995 BTC, I searched its received (origin) taint analysis on blockchain.info for both my from address and CoinClean's original from address. Neither were there, so it was an effective mixing.
However, the status page http://coinclean.cc/verify.html said "Successfull tumble" (typo: successful) almost immediately after I sent to CoinClean's mixing address, even though my original TX took +2,859 minutes to be included in a block (I didn't include a fee because Electrum didn't say I had to). So, until verify.html is fixed, I wouldn't depend on it for status updates - only the blockchain itself.
However, the status page http://coinclean.cc/verify.html said "Successfull tumble" (typo: successful) almost immediately after I sent to CoinClean's mixing address, even though my original TX took +2,859 minutes to be included in a block (I didn't include a fee because Electrum didn't say I had to). So, until verify.html is fixed, I wouldn't depend on it for status updates - only the blockchain itself.
March 14, 2014, 11:14:39 AM
Great service. I used 0.01 BTC and worked well.
I will write a detailed review later.
I will write a detailed review later.
March 14, 2014, 09:27:15 AM
Engine update: Now working faster!
March 11, 2014, 09:08:33 AM
We've mixed about 250 Bitcoins in the last couple of days! Thank you for this big volume and please leave a feedback
March 09, 2014, 06:40:59 AM
It is a good service!
Thank you!
We've processed 25 BTC just in the last 12 hours, thank you for this trust and please leave a feedback if you've successfully used our service!
March 08, 2014, 12:00:55 PM
It is a good service!
March 08, 2014, 05:23:34 AM
The mixed volume increased tonight from 3 BTC to 15 BTC !
Thank you!
Thank you!
March 07, 2014, 08:22:23 AM
Small Update:
- Fixed some bugs
- Verifier is now working faster!
- API updated
Thank you for a already mixed volume of 3.82 BTC!
- Fixed some bugs
- Verifier is now working faster!
- API updated
Thank you for a already mixed volume of 3.82 BTC!
Jump to: