[ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) | Pure PoS | Original COMM MultiPools Coming Soon - page 369.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: djm34 on April 16, 2014, 08:40:38 AM

Quote from: Land Marks on April 16, 2014, 08:28:58 AM

Who in the world thought it would be good for 'community' to devise a bizarre draconian process for deciding who gets 'let in' and who gets 'rejected'. This causes a lot of discontent and drives many people away from the coin. It is weird. I understand the people who are very upset and may be acting out in this thread. I am not part of this, as I am a new member and would never qualify, but I still feel compelled to get involved. You guys should be ashamed of yourselfs. This is not what a good 'community' looks like.

No matter what selection process you use, there will always be angry people
There is a new copycat of comm, who is doing some giveaway based on your facebook usage, seriously how fair is that ?
(It isn't fair because I can't get in... Grin

I could start some drama or feud... but the good thing is I just don't care, I can't get in well too bad
but there are other coins. )
Other example, solo mining mining against kgw, most of the time I just don't get anything... this is so unfair... Grin

There are always a "good" reason to get mad at something. Grin

they should just ask you for a screen of your name + wallet, should be enough for anti-cheating

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Land Marks on April 16, 2014, 08:28:58 AM

Who in the world thought it would be good for 'community' to devise a bizarre draconian process for deciding who gets 'let in' and who gets 'rejected'. This causes a lot of discontent and drives many people away from the coin. It is weird. I understand the people who are very upset and may be acting out in this thread. I am not part of this, as I am a new member and would never qualify, but I still feel compelled to get involved. You guys should be ashamed of yourselfs. This is not what a good 'community' looks like.

No matter what selection process you use, there will always be angry people
There is a new copycat of comm, who is doing some giveaway based on your facebook usage, seriously how fair is that ?
(It isn't fair because I can't get in... Grin

I could start some drama or feud... but the good thing is I just don't care, I can't get in well too bad
but there are other coins. )
Other example, solo mining mining against kgw, most of the time I just don't get anything... this is so unfair... Grin

There are always "good" reasons to get mad at something. Grin

Majormax

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1129

Quote from: WarrenP on April 16, 2014, 08:32:32 AM

Quote from: Land Marks on April 16, 2014, 08:28:58 AM

Who in the world thought it would be good for 'community' to devise a bizarre draconian process for deciding who gets 'let in' and who gets 'rejected'. This causes a lot of discontent and drives many people away from the coin. It is weird. I understand the people who are very upset and may be acting out in this thread. I am not part of this, as I am a new member and would never qualify, but I still feel compelled to get involved. You guys should be ashamed of yourselfs. This is not what a good 'community' looks like.

You do understand that society as a whole works exactly like this? There is no actual universal acceptance... birds of a feather flock together and all that.

This may indeed be what a Great Community looks like. Time will tell, and everyone is free to buy COMM on exchanges (also to sell)..Critics are often hypocrites anyway (but they think they know best)

There are hundreds of currencies , many of which have tried novel forms of 'Distribution'... this is just another experiment: it has a good chance of working.

richwang

hero member

Activity: 605

Merit: 500

Quote from: djm34 on April 05, 2014, 09:27:53 AM

I think the rules which were put in place for a distribution of the comm are pretty good.
(although the process is a bit lengthy... but if you want the coin, you need to deserve it)
When you see that some people are asking for coins and they didn't even read the OP page... Roll Eyes

newuser01

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Hello

Is it still possible to be part of this community without buying in?

WarrenP

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

PHqpBmGrA3V6GqzmyQWEaQTjCMDGfSDbcn

Quote from: Land Marks on April 16, 2014, 08:28:58 AM

Who in the world thought it would be good for 'community' to devise a bizarre draconian process for deciding who gets 'let in' and who gets 'rejected'. This causes a lot of discontent and drives many people away from the coin. It is weird. I understand the people who are very upset and may be acting out in this thread. I am not part of this, as I am a new member and would never qualify, but I still feel compelled to get involved. You guys should be ashamed of yourselfs. This is not what a good 'community' looks like.

You do understand that society as a whole works exactly like this? There is no actual universal acceptance... birds of a feather flock together and all that.

sammy007

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1003

Quote from: djm34 on April 16, 2014, 08:29:13 AM

Quote from: d5000 on April 16, 2014, 08:19:40 AM

Quote from: Majormax on April 16, 2014, 07:41:53 AM

I believe the main purpose of PoS is to use the open wallets to maintain the network. With minting possible from paperwallets, there would be a risk that the network could die. I would not myself support that, unless someone can show me what the benefit would be.

There are proposals to solve this problem. In the Peercoin (PPC) community we have discussed some, but none has been implemented so far.

The trick would be that you have two wallets, a hot wallet and a cold wallet, and that you prove cryptographically the ownership of both of them so you can mint with the coin-age of both wallets combined when only one of them is online. That means: You can only mint with the coin-age of the "cold wallet" when you have the "hot wallet" open. But there is no need that he "hot wallet" would have any coins in it.

So the incentive to let the client open and mint is not affected, but the private keys of the wallet containing most of the coins can be held offline.

wouldn't be there a risk to have non existing coin minting ? or hack like that ?

IIRC it's possible to open wallet just for Minting in one of current Mintcoin clones. Probably in original mintcoin.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: d5000 on April 16, 2014, 08:19:40 AM

Quote from: Majormax on April 16, 2014, 07:41:53 AM

I believe the main purpose of PoS is to use the open wallets to maintain the network. With minting possible from paperwallets, there would be a risk that the network could die. I would not myself support that, unless someone can show me what the benefit would be.

There are proposals to solve this problem. In the Peercoin (PPC) community we have discussed some, but none has been implemented so far.

The trick would be that you have two wallets, a hot wallet and a cold wallet, and that you prove cryptographically the ownership of both of them so you can mint with the coin-age of both wallets combined when only one of them is online. That means: You can only mint with the coin-age of the "cold wallet" when you have the "hot wallet" open. But there is no need that he "hot wallet" would have any coins in it.

So the incentive to let the client open and mint is not affected, but the private keys of the wallet containing most of the coins can be held offline.

wouldn't be there a risk to have non existing coin minting (or coin which have been removed from the cold storage to some other place continuing minting ) ? or hack like that ?

Land Marks

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Who in the world thought it would be good for 'community' to devise a bizarre draconian process for deciding who gets 'let in' and who gets 'rejected'. This causes a lot of discontent and drives many people away from the coin. It is weird. I understand the people who are very upset and may be acting out in this thread. I am not part of this, as I am a new member and would never qualify, but I still feel compelled to get involved. You guys should be ashamed of yourselfs. This is not what a good 'community' looks like.

dismoon

full member

Activity: 209

Merit: 101

Smells good!

Thanks DEV！！I have received the coins!It's great!
support this coin!

I'll vote it to mintal

d5000

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 6249

Decentralization Maximalist

Quote from: Majormax on April 16, 2014, 07:41:53 AM

I believe the main purpose of PoS is to use the open wallets to maintain the network. With minting possible from paperwallets, there would be a risk that the network could die. I would not myself support that, unless someone can show me what the benefit would be.

There are proposals to solve this problem. In the Peercoin (PPC) community we have discussed some, but none has been implemented so far.

The trick would be that you have two wallets, a hot wallet and a cold wallet, and that you prove cryptographically the ownership of both of them so you can mint with the coin-age of both wallets combined when only one of them is online. That means: You can only mint with the coin-age of the "cold wallet" when you have the "hot wallet" open. But there is no need that he "hot wallet" would have any coins in it.

So the incentive to let the client open and mint is not affected, but the private keys of the wallet containing most of the coins can be held offline.

drm

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1005

there will always be (initial) dumpers/traders, its just weak hands leaving the train and other people are getting on
multipool at full steam = happy times for comm

brightlight

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1000

For Linux wallet support I sent pledget 3k COMMs to signorama.

Linux users, please, donate to this member, as he didn't receive any stakes. Community needs the people like signorama! Especially for Linux wallet support. Those who blame dev for not receiving 2nd stake, learn from signorama

Status: 4/unconfirmed, broadcast through 2 nodes
Date: 16/04/14 16:08
To: signorama CU***4oF
Debit: -3000.00 COMM
Transaction fee: -0.01 COMM
Net amount: -3000.01 COMM
Transaction ID: 476c3e493d8572f4b9379fcf6fb9cd8918e12aa5130457691cb861396103dc60

lucienlu

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: ownerbest on April 16, 2014, 08:10:22 AM

Guys, good chance to buy now!

How much now?

brightlight

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1000

For Linux wallet support I sent pledget 3k COMMs to signorama.

Linux users, please, donate to this member, as he didn't receive any stakes. Community needs the people like signorama! Especially for Linux wallet support.

Status: 4/unconfirmed, broadcast through 2 nodes
Date: 16/04/14 16:08
To: signorama CU***4oF
Debit: -3000.00 COMM
Transaction fee: -0.01 COMM
Net amount: -3000.01 COMM
Transaction ID: 476c3e493d8572f4b9379fcf6fb9cd8918e12aa5130457691cb861396103dc60

ltcjunky43

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: Adriano on April 16, 2014, 08:06:49 AM

Quote from: communitycoin on April 16, 2014, 02:07:25 AM

@adriano i pmed you again.

it was not working if sync from scratch you need to put a check if the block height is above 28700 (last activity on that wallet was 286xx) then do his check so to avoid crashes because of the valid transactions of that wallet that wallet sent a lot distributions, so has many valid transactions before.

The code I proposed will probably need to be moved to CTxMemPool::accept which is responsible only for new transactions being accepted into the mempool, not the ones already in blocks...

I can do it later tonight if nobody do it before me, during the day I can't focus on this as I have a full-time job.

Time to someone step in :-)

And since some haters are talking too much in the forum, I decided to state the following disclaimer:

Disclaimer: I am not COMM's developer neither have I idealized it... My work here is completly volunteer work and only because I think COMM have a lot to add to the community, despite the haters.

Every community has its haters. we just have to deal with them. People are upset that they didn't get stake. but they are only showing us why they didnt get it.

ownerbest

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Guys, good chance to buy now!

*Sakura*

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1005

I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!

jkljb

member

Activity: 107

Merit: 10

Quote from: Soulmate on April 16, 2014, 07:30:44 AM

Quote from: godt on April 16, 2014, 07:25:22 AM

I can not download a wallet. Chrome block it.

Use firefox or internet explorer! Chrome blocks it by default!!!

Chrome Shit, use Firefox or IE. Grin

Adriano

staff

Activity: 1286

Merit: 1085

Quote from: communitycoin on April 16, 2014, 02:07:25 AM

@adriano i pmed you again.

it was not working if sync from scratch you need to put a check if the block height is above 28700 (last activity on that wallet was 286xx) then do his check so to avoid crashes because of the valid transactions of that wallet that wallet sent a lot distributions, so has many valid transactions before.

The code I proposed will probably need to be moved to CTxMemPool::accept which is responsible only for new transactions being accepted into the mempool, not the ones already in blocks...

I can do it later tonight if nobody do it before me, during the day I can't focus on this as I have a full-time job.

Time to someone step in :-)

And since some haters are talking too much in the forum, I decided to state the following disclaimer:

Disclaimer: I am not COMM's developer neither have I idealized it... My work here is completly volunteer work and only because I think COMM have a lot to add to the community, despite the haters.

Topic: [ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) | Pure PoS | Original COMM MultiPools Coming Soon - page 369. (Read 523929 times)