Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [CPU mining] Yenten v3.1.0 [YTN] [YespowerR16] [Exchange available] - page 2. (Read 16347 times)

newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
As the first coin of the yespowerr16 algorithm
YTN's future market value of US $8 billion is worth believing Smiley

I think the most potential property of the current CPU coin is sugarchain. The 5-second block speed is more characteristic than YTN. Its coin holding distribution is very scattered, and it will have more advantages than other CPU coins. Of course, this is only my personal view. Monroe has been too expensive. If it can enter the CPU circuit with capital in the future, it will be a star.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Added Yenten to Our Pool!
Fee : 0,5 %
Happy to Mine!

https://cminer.org/
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
As the first coin of the yespowerr16 algorithm
YTN's future market value of US $8 billion is worth believing Smiley
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 110
The new version received acclaim from previous version's avid supporters for faster header hashing. The header hashes faster than otter's ovary hole contracts from orgasmic shudders. I want to underscore the following item of my thought process, something that I just now have come up with, lets just make a pledge of capital to secure the coin's marketcap at 8 billion. Can u pledge ur life savings to pump it to nine figures?
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
New version 5.0
What has been updated?
Faster synchronization?
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
Good news:
 (#YTN) wallet is back online on Graviex exchange!
Welcome to trade: 
#YTN/#BTC - https://graviex.net/markets/ytnbtc

https://twitter.com/graviex_net/status/1607091409378492420
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
Yenten 5 - beta

https://github.com/yentencoin/yenten/tree/yenten-5.0.0 - Yenten 5 version - is currently in beta, and is undergoing final testing. The full migration to version 5 will be January 30, 2023.
 - block header hashing has been optimized - for faster blockchain synchronization
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
Trade now on SouthExchange, buy Yenten - best cpu coin

https://main.southxchange.com/Market/Book/YTN/BTC

member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
Version 5.0 is being prepared, there were problems with the new header hashing, but it seems to have been solved. After a closed test, there will be an open test.

The second change they wanted to make will probably be in version 5.1 and after a vote with the community - it obviously affects developer funding and listings on exchanges

His own exchanger will not do, but will be the exchange + simplified script, so that everyone could put it on a hosting with support for php.
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
+30000 votes at SouthExchange; 180000 votes, still 1st place in the vote list and 70000 votes left to match the listing criteria

https://main.southxchange.com/Home/Vote

copper member
Activity: 230
Merit: 35
+30000 votes at SouthExchange, still 1st place in the vote list

main.southxchange.com/Home/Vote

member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
Well, I think that Exbitron is a good exchange, but it's far from getting enough votes to be added.

It's just a matter of time. Very soon

A huge percent of the max supply is mined out at this point isn't it? That double spend bug crippled original YTN hodlers/started a huge delisting wave, if a I remember correctly. Why don't you guys create a new crypto (diff name), you can multiply max supply, create a fresh brand with this new algo and the core values of being a cpu coin remain?
Would make more sense, even if you had to restart from 0 in sense of exchanges. It is a bit late for a rebrand I think, it isn't enough anymore. I like the new algo, but it came a bit late still CPU coins are retro and ppl want to relieve that era of CPU mining.

The double spending was canceled by switching to the old version, where there was no error. In the end, everyone was left with their coins. Then we released a new version without errors and agreed with exchanges that we go to it. In the end, the coin was revived, not a single holder was not cheated. We are currently the only honest cpu coin you can make now and get a good profit in the future. A lot of similar coins to ours appeared in the last two years, but all of them closed down. Yenten - no pre-mine, evenly distributed coins.
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
News

On October 1, 2022 we plan to reveal a new version of yentencoin.info website as well as a beta version of the new official wallet. After thorough testing of the new wallet at the major software platforms we plan to migrate on it completely within a three months timeframe in order to give to all the exchanges enough time for update. Then we will post our roadmap for the next six months. Thanks to the Community for supporting the coin!
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
 +24000 votes at SouthExchange - good move.

Now 60000 votes and 3rd place (!!) in the vote list.



https://main.southxchange.com/Home/Vote
member
Activity: 325
Merit: 26
Well, I think that Exbitron is a good exchange, but it's far from getting enough votes to be added.

It's just a matter of time. Very soon

A huge percent of the max supply is mined out at this point isn't it? That double spend bug crippled original YTN hodlers/started a huge delisting wave, if a I remember correctly. Why don't you guys create a new crypto (diff name), you can multiply max supply, create a fresh brand with this new algo and the core values of being a cpu coin remain?
Would make more sense, even if you had to restart from 0 in sense of exchanges. It is a bit late for a rebrand I think, it isn't enough anymore. I like the new algo, but it came a bit late still CPU coins are retro and ppl want to relieve that era of CPU mining.
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
Well, I think that Exbitron is a good exchange, but it's far from getting enough votes to be added.

It's just a matter of time. Very soon
member
Activity: 301
Merit: 26
member
Activity: 316
Merit: 21
Well, I think that Exbitron is a good exchange, but it's far from getting enough votes to be added.
Pages:
Jump to: