Topic: [ANN] CREDITS - New Blockchain for financial industry [OFFICIAL THREAD] - page 126. (Read 40276 times)

Please check the old thread, the thread was dominated by two or three guys who keep posting useless and redundant post and consider the over 20k people who invested and supported Credits as paid shills, these bullies should be ban on this forum.

Glad there's a new thread.  The fudders are insane.  I love credits and will keep on supporting it.  No, I'm not a shill or a bot, just an investor putting my money where my mouth is.  Credits to the mooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnn! 

Lets see if you are going to act to everyone like this then.

Personal disassembly arrange in private messages, if you continue in this tone here to write, I will have to delete you. Trad is created to discuss the project and not personal clarification of the relationship. So hold yourself in hand. I'm not kidding, you're walking on a thin ice.

CS will potentially explode if partnership with other projects or financial instution that what happen to ETH

So we should keep only you and the new fake accounts that create fake hypes every day right?
You are such a pathetic investor that everyone in this industry should find out what is your purpose here and then should not value your opinion anymore.
Manipulating everything for your personal gain.
You are one of the parasites on this industry.

a new thread ??
how about the old thread??

My greetings to new CREDITS thread! Though it's not in my nature to keep quiet I  had no desire at all to ask anything in old one.  It doesn't have to be that way here. I've always wondered about Credits technicalities particularly his smart contract programming language i.e. "JS equal language".  What does it mean exactly, "equal language"?  Biyteball  also brings to bear JS to write smart contracts. And his  contracts are "human readable" .  Will CREDITS contracts "mirror" human language?

Great project in 2018. Wish good luck.

Why should you open for a new ANN if the project already over?
Would it fine if you just using the old one instead of opening for this new thread?

Well we now have it many members are requesting for a moderated one and now we got one but I notice some guys post are still showing here that can be considered as spam, I hope with these new thread we can talk Credits evolution as one of the top coin for 2018.

I would like to see that statement confirmed by a team member, such as cheus, before believing it.

Why would a team member spoil the thread of the project for which he is working, or why would any project allow a team member to do so?


With 'spam' I indeed refer to your copy-paste posts, over and over again, and with 'fud' I refer to (among others) your accusations of CREDITS being a scam without delivering proof. It is that simple. Constructive posts are not spam. Proving scams is not fud. But since you copy-paste and accuse without proof your posts simply and objectively classify as 'spam' and 'fud'. That's not a matter of opinion, it is as it is.


Where have I posted stupid updates, creating false accounts or used faul language? Please give reference when you accuse me of such things. It seems to be your habbit to accuse without delivering proper proof.

About the 1 million TPS; that's the most eye catching CREDITS feature. Of course you will find interested people talking about that. You will find talk about key features of a project in every single ANN thread at Bitcointalk. What's your obsession with CREDITS in specific? Warn people against losing money from investing, as you claimed? You'd be one busy guy on this forum if that were to be your true sole motive.

Besides all that you are forgetting that you are posting in the CREDITS ANN thread. And if they want to keep the vibes in their thread positive they have every right to do so by continuing with a self-moderated thread. And if you instead want to create negative vibes around the projec then what's stopping you from creating a [FUD][ICO]CREDITS thread? Self-moderated or not.

About fake hyping posts. I don't like those either, so in this we may agree. We'll find that especially in over crowded Telegram chats of any project. Here at Bitcointalk you often find newbies posting such nonsense to increase their post count. And again you'll find such posts scattered all over Bitcointalk, not just in the CREDITS thread. It usually has nothing to do with paid shills. But you see what you want, or decided, to see.

Good night.

Karl Max will never be considered as spam as its from their team and he does that in every thread they have.

If i judge from your previous replies on the previous thread about a moderated thread you were talking,
you, aioc and some others, you were replying to me and the others that we were presenting some facts about credits.
So when you reply to me and others about a moderated thread you were referring mostly to our action.

So once more. As long as you and others make objective and constructive discussion and NO just stupid updates, creating fake accounts to tell us to f*ck off about our critic, moon price predictions and nonsense achievements about 1 trillion TPS to create fake hypes EVERY DAY, then there is no problem.
Lets see the value speaking.

This price action is all about Suppoman shilling it, as he did yesterday, and as he often does. It's one of his top Ten picks.  https://youtu.be/L0wduPpfsE8

I'm not saying Suppoman is wrong, but the price will come back down, I expect.  It's overvalued above $70,000,000 given it's still in the concept stage, and given the strong competition. It's also far outside the top 100 on MarketCap.

If Binance lists Credit$, and we can have stop-loss trading, then it has a chance to really soar, but not until then, I suspect.

I would imagine we'll see 0.50 again in about a week or so, as we did this earlier morning.  I would be selling into this strength, knowing I could buy back in, at a lower price. Last week we saw evidence that a couple of big whales bought up a considerable amount, causing a sudden two short lived price spikes, similar to what we're seeing today.

Unless, someone is certain that we'll get a Binance listing by the end of this month, I would not be a buyer above 0.50 cents.

Moderation is needed when a thread is spammed with non constructive posts.

My negative trust proves especially that certain DT2 members on this forum abuse the trust system for their own benefit.

I mean the spam messages of Karl Max who hides a reference to his commercial website underneath CREDITS news photo's.

The above two messages of Karl Max (before his post may disappear) and you prove that it is important to moderate regularly to keep this thread a bit clean.

This sentence doesn't even make sense, so I cannot answer it.

Objective and constructive discussions with a moderated thread?
Does your negative trust proves this "objective and constructive" discussion side of you?
Commercial website linking? Steemit and reddit articles that they reviewed the code you mean?
To find time to moderate this thread regularly?
Is that how you will do your business you scam?

I'm happy with the choice. I hope that in this thread we will find a bit more objective and constructive discussions about CREDITS, instead of the fud spamming and commercial website linkings that were overflooding the previous ANN. Condition for that is that the moderator finds enough time to check and moderate this thread regularly.

I'm not a big fan of a moderated thread but there are so many spam post and redundant post here that something has to be done, so far there is a big leap in Credits prices I guess it's true that this coin is going to be in the top position before the year, could be a candidate for the top coin in the market this year.

I asked if you are going to include in spamming EVERY account or only the ones that present facts about how credits is operating. There are plenty accounts that are not representatives in different topics and do useless posts in every day base. You already know about these accounts.
If you dont know these accounts let me know and i will present them here too.
Is my problem that many accounts are created just to comment about moon price predictions, useless updates, fake achievements and just to reply to me and few others here that we are fuders and stuff like that? Are these accounts going to be included in spamming or you are going to delete only the posts from the people that you dont agree with?