Topic: 🌟🌟🚀 [ANN] CRYPTOFLIX 🌟🌟🚀 Watch Movies. Fund Films. Get Cryptos. Repeat. - page 219. (Read 42496 times)

You are absolutely right. Let's look at netflix. I think they will do all they can to attract more users. Will be hard for CRYPTOFLIX to reach customers from them.

That's something I wonder with lots of projects. They are all 100% dream scenarios wherein EVERYTHING goes right and there is no competition.

I am puzzled about Cryptoflix' business model. How can they do all those things promised in the whitepaper, undercut competitors and yet be self-sustainable?

I like the name too. It has a high brand recognition if you will. "Crypto" and "(net)"Flix".

I am puzzled about Cryptoflix' business model. How can they do all those things promised in the whitepaper, undercut competitors and yet be self-sustainable?

I am puzzled about Cryptoflix' business model. How can they do all those things promised in the whitepaper, undercut competitors and yet be self-sustainable?

So for the so called "experts" give to unbanked people a platform to watch non-pirated movies on demand and a platform for movies' crowdfuding, isn't original. Lol experts

The rating there is only 7 out of 10. Not enough for such a promising project. It is interesting with what it is connected. Probably with the fact that, according to experts, the idea does not contain something original. However, all these ratings are highly subjective.

Exactly. So if you ask me this 'flix'-ending was a great move. When you hear the name of the project, you instantly think of Netflix and start to get curious about the project.

About the "flix" thing it is probably purely for marketing reasons.

For example, i saw this ico because of the flix thing.

I could imagine it to be pretty cool to watch a movie which is funded with the help of cryptocurrency investors.

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

This made for marketing purposes specially I think. But there is nothing bad. May be this will attract more people to project.

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

Just wanted to clarify the difference between the Netflix Model and the CRYPTOFLIX Model.

Netflix is mainly comparable to a Pay TV channel, except they do not have a fixed schedule. They pay license fees for the period where the content is on their platform up front and users can watch the movies as many times as they want, when they want.

In the film industry windows, Netflix is among the last stops in the income waterfall before free TV, but after VOD and DVD/BluRay. So Netflix will not have brand new movies, other than their own, because the content owners want income from the other windows first.

Also Netflix are producing their own content, which I believe they have re-allocated as many funds to as for licensing in 2018 so likely expect more of their own content going forward and less third party content.

The CRYPTOFLIX Model is more comparable to that of iTunes, which is a revenue sharing model where the content owners put their content on the platform against a share of the revenue and at no cost other than storage and administration to the platform.

CRYPTOFLIX will be different than the existing platforms in that it will be possible to use the platform without an Apple device and without a credit card (by using FLIX Tokens) and we will have more flexibility for the content owners in that the minimum quality requirements for entry onto the platform will be lower than the minimum standards for iTunes etc. and also our pricing structure will be more flexible. Also we can use smart contracts to share the revenue instantly with the content owners - in the current platforms this can take months or even years.