[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 284.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: bigjme on July 01, 2014, 03:31:03 AM

Im still hoping and wishing on jpc hitting it big lol

would be the first time a coin listed on mintpal increases in value... (don't even understand why some dude paid several btc to get it listed...)
I should have get rid of it when it was at 80sat... (and I should have get rid of my BBL when it was at 10k... would have made 8btc Angry

... )

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Im still hoping and wishing on jpc hitting it big lol

th00ber

hero member

Activity: 789

Merit: 501

Monero seems not so bad to mine, can you give a good pool with nice payout ?

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: I_M on July 01, 2014, 12:18:11 AM

It should be trivial to merge forks.

I'll be waiting with a merge until the stability issues on particular Windows versions are under control.

Christian

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Guys and Girls, I didnt get one thing, do you all mining Monero with this new cryptonight compilation of ccminer , or there is some new different coin with more profit?

Strannik-74

full member

Activity: 348

Merit: 102

Quote from: PVmining on June 29, 2014, 05:21:26 PM

Quote from: tsiv on June 29, 2014, 01:24:45 PM

Took the easy gains first, around 18% boost on 750 Ti. Still trying to wrap my head around the hard part.

[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.07 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.72 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 285.23 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.80 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.69 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.42 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:12:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 274.37 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:12:04] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 1701.50 H/s (yay!!!)

...more performance gain than I thought. really nice. thanks!
missing your donation address as signature or on github

MSI GTX 750 Ti 2Gb, ASUS GTX 750 1Gb
[2014-07-01 12:06:53] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 273.76 H/s
[2014-07-01 12:06:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750, 257.37 H/s
[2014-07-01 12:06:59] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 508.83 H/s (yay!!!)

seljak

member

Activity: 101

Merit: 10

Quote from: trogdorjw73 on June 30, 2014, 03:54:19 PM

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

what h/s do you get on gtx770 with 6x60?

I_M

full member

Activity: 135

Merit: 100

It should be trivial to merge forks.

squadbox

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: nomad1109 on June 30, 2014, 07:44:28 PM

I think this is his attempt to nudge development in the right direction.... add on that he just donated .5 BTC, and I have to say I am impressed.

I think that someone needs to start a GitHub organization like sgminer did, and let tsiv, djm, bombadil and maybe cbuchner all work together instead of maintaining 4 separate versions.

nomad1109

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Medichain: The Medical Big-Data Platform

Equitum

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: matrix961 on June 30, 2014, 08:56:43 PM

Quote from: Equitum on June 30, 2014, 08:24:21 PM

Quote from: trogdorjw73 on June 30, 2014, 03:54:19 PM

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

-l 4x120 gives me 420-450 h/s on my 780 Ti on today's release from tsiv. Lots of posters from the earlier release found good results with -l 8x60 on 750 Tis, but my GPU lost performance or crashed for the same threads x blocks with any number of threads that isn't 4 (i.e. my GPU didn't like -l 8x60 or -l 6x80, and got worse results, or crashed, on these launch configs).

I'm assuming you are on windows. Sounds just like what I experienced when I was running it on windows, I'm running the same card. In order to fix the crashing you can apply the tdr delay reg workaround at the link below. After I did that I was able to run at 6x120 which I found to be the best for the 780 ti. That should give you an additional gain. Let me know if you try it.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7529269

Thanks for the suggestion - up to 450-475 h/s range!

tc61

hero member

Activity: 494

Merit: 500

Quote from: matrix961 on June 30, 2014, 08:56:43 PM

I'm assuming you are on windows. Sounds just like what I experienced when I was running it on windows, I'm running the same card. In order to fix the crashing you can apply the tdr delay reg workaround at the link below. After I did that I was able to run at 6x120 which I found to be the best for the 780 ti. That should give you an additional gain. Let me know if you try it.

https://bitcointa.lk/threads/bounty-for-open-sourced-monero-gpu-miners-bounty-thread.330655/page-4#post-7209253

HAve you guys done any work with the 750ti? just wondering what launch you found to be best...
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #7KeDs1WkWke59Hxr

matrix961

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 100

Quote from: Equitum on June 30, 2014, 08:24:21 PM

Quote from: trogdorjw73 on June 30, 2014, 03:54:19 PM

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

-l 4x120 gives me 420-450 h/s on my 780 Ti on today's release from tsiv. Lots of posters from the earlier release found good results with -l 8x60 on 750 Tis, but my GPU lost performance or crashed for the same threads x blocks with any number of threads that isn't 4 (i.e. my GPU didn't like -l 8x60 or -l 6x80, and got worse results, or crashed, on these launch configs).

I'm assuming you are on windows. Sounds just like what I experienced when I was running it on windows, I'm running the same card. In order to fix the crashing you can apply the tdr delay reg workaround at the link below. After I did that I was able to run at 6x120 which I found to be the best for the 780 ti. That should give you an additional gain. Let me know if you try it.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7529269

Equitum

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: trogdorjw73 on June 30, 2014, 03:54:19 PM

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

-l 4x120 gives me 420-450 h/s on my 780 Ti on today's release from tsiv. Lots of posters from the earlier release found good results with -l 8x60 on 750 Tis, but my GPU lost performance or crashed for the same threads x blocks with any number of threads that isn't 4 (i.e. my GPU didn't like -l 8x60 or -l 6x80, and got worse results, or crashed, on these launch configs).

cayars

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: yellowduck2 on June 30, 2014, 07:59:39 PM

claymore crytonight open source

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unfinished-cryptonight-opencl-amd-miner-671784

Maybe their code can boost Nvidia ?

That's is wolf's early draft/release that's only partially ported to GPU. Not claymore's.

yellowduck2

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

claymore crytonight open source

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unfinished-cryptonight-opencl-amd-miner-671784

Maybe their code can boost Nvidia ?

nomad1109

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Medichain: The Medical Big-Data Platform

Can anyone who has tried out Monero with some 750ti's post their power draw while mining?

I haven't touched it yet, but wanted to update the power numbers in the profit calc so it reports fairly accurately.

Thanks

nomad1109

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Medichain: The Medical Big-Data Platform

Quote from: cbuchner1 on June 30, 2014, 03:59:08 PM

someone needs to come up with an autotune. Just sayin'...

NOTE: separate autotuning would be required for the 3 kernels of the algorithm.

I think this is his attempt to nudge development in the right direction.... add on that he just donated .5 BTC, and I have to say I am impressed.

nomad1109

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Medichain: The Medical Big-Data Platform

Quote from: cbuchner1 on June 30, 2014, 02:40:53 AM

not bad. The private mining code we have is only marginally faster now

GPU hashrate: 1561.1578

that's for 3 780 Ti cards.

Congratulations to tsiv for his work so far! I noticed several of his changes closely match what we have done to optimize.

Christian

Well done TSIV... you are about 18% behind and still making progress. Which indeed deserves a big attaboy.

I also wanted to note that I appreciate that Christian still continues to participate, comment and encourage even thought he has nothing to gain from this being done by others. I think the encouragement helps a ton for those who are coding, and his commenting finally on an actual speed is also encouraging.

Just my thoughts!!

tc61

hero member

Activity: 494

Merit: 500

Is it just me or do the launch kernels conflict with the underlying Maxwell architecture? They are so far from the usual launch configs we are used to..
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Xwz9r5wNw8ElGF4n

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 284. (Read 3426936 times)