ok so i just tried to compile compute 5.0 and it fails at the start, i am guessing i need cuda 6?
yes, compute 5.0 it's a feature of cuda 6
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 526. (Read 3426976 times)
May 06, 2014, 03:18:31 AM
May 06, 2014, 03:16:07 AM
i am planning to add 1 more rig to my house.Do you guys think buying 6x750ti is best bang for the buck?Thinking of either asus OC-2GD5 or msi N750 Ti TF 2GD5/OC
Definitely!
Also, the most efficient combo, and you can mine the magic nvidia coins exploited by the Christian duo.
May 06, 2014, 02:54:34 AM
i am planning to add 1 more rig to my house.Do you guys think buying 6x750ti is best bang for the buck?Thinking of either asus OC-2GD5 or msi N750 Ti TF 2GD5/OC
May 06, 2014, 01:57:48 AM
ok so i just tried to compile compute 5.0 and it fails at the start, i am guessing i need cuda 6?
word from the amazing C&C crew?
word from the amazing C&C crew?
May 06, 2014, 01:56:17 AM
Total n00b question: in CCminer is there any way to reduce the "size" of the work you get from the pool? Instead of having to do 80M hashes in one submit to break that up into say 10 hashes of 8M each. Or is that just a function of difficulty? Lots of Jackpot blocks are being solved in the 8-20 seconds it takes for me to submit my work back to the server and I'm not getting credit because I didn't get mine in before the block was solved 
That's purely a function of the diff (for as far as I know, that is), try setting the suggested diff lower, see if that helps.
May 06, 2014, 01:52:07 AM
@ C&C Hash Factory.
Thanks to you guys I am getting 109,210 Kh/s on Mjollnir Coin ( 8 - 750 ti's @ 12,700 each and 1 - 670 @ 10,100 Kh/s). If you are still mining or have mined it if you put your addy's up I'll send you some in a day or two after I build some up.
Also want to say thanks to bigjme for compiling. I know C&C have been busy coding. I'll send something in your address in your signature. Give me a couple of days also.
Thanks to you guys I am getting 109,210 Kh/s on Mjollnir Coin ( 8 - 750 ti's @ 12,700 each and 1 - 670 @ 10,100 Kh/s). If you are still mining or have mined it if you put your addy's up I'll send you some in a day or two after I build some up.
Also want to say thanks to bigjme for compiling. I know C&C have been busy coding. I'll send something in your address in your signature. Give me a couple of days also.
May 06, 2014, 01:19:05 AM
before compiling, set all occurences of #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI
to 1 then it runs a good chunk faster on Maxwell.
to 1 then it runs a good chunk faster on Maxwell.
it comes with it set to 1 as default so i just compile it
compute 3.0 and 2.0 i change it to 0I'm pretty sure the compute 5.0 in v.08 was a decent jump in speed compared to the 3.5 on my 750s, my memory could be foggy though. Maybe it was for something else?
Can you do a compute 5.0? I think if work calms down I'll start compiling or tweaking as well, it's been a while.
May 06, 2014, 01:13:21 AM
Btw, Ich hoffe dass du damit eine Kiste von König Pilsener holen kannst, oder? 
In Munich we prefer local beers like Augustiner, Franziskaner, Paulaner
What do you guys think of Hacker-Pschorr over there? It's one of my favorites for most occasions but it's harder to find at most bars(pubs) in the states. Franziskaner is really good but I've only had it on a couple occasions.
May 06, 2014, 12:56:20 AM
Feel free to ignore or delete this post if you think inappropriate.
Anyone had a chance to run nvidia+cudaminer and ati+cgminer in one computer? Is there a special option or settings for cudaminer?
Anyone had a chance to run nvidia+cudaminer and ati+cgminer in one computer? Is there a special option or settings for cudaminer?
I've ran that in the past...mining yacoin on both 4 r7 240s and a gtx 780.
Just make sure you install the nvidia drivers first, then plug monitor on amd cards and install catalyst.
After that you need to get some dummy plugs and voila.
I don't think it'll work at all using linux.
Great to hear that!
So with your previous setup, cudaminer will detect 1 GPU and cgminer with 4 GPU? with no special syntax or something?
Thanks!
May 06, 2014, 12:20:16 AM
Feel free to ignore or delete this post if you think inappropriate.
Anyone had a chance to run nvidia+cudaminer and ati+cgminer in one computer? Is there a special option or settings for cudaminer?
Anyone had a chance to run nvidia+cudaminer and ati+cgminer in one computer? Is there a special option or settings for cudaminer?
I've ran that in the past...mining yacoin on both 4 r7 240s and a gtx 780.
Just make sure you install the nvidia drivers first, then plug monitor on amd cards and install catalyst.
After that you need to get some dummy plugs and voila.
I don't think it'll work at all using linux.
Great to hear that!
So with your previous setup, cudaminer will detect 1 GPU and cgminer with 4 GPU? with no special syntax or something?
Thanks!
May 05, 2014, 11:54:07 PM
10% increase for Titan
30% for Maxwell.
Not bad at all Christian. But to be honest I did expect more
. Anyway we have another cuda coin again.
Send 1mil JPC to your address Tell me if you don't get it.
30% for Maxwell.
Not bad at all Christian. But to be honest I did expect more
. Anyway we have another cuda coin again.Send 1mil JPC to your address
Tell me if you don't get it.yes got it. Made my total go from 11 mil to 12 mil. Thanks.
did you adjust the MAXWELL_OR_FERMI flag in the quark/cuda_groestl512.cu module? The Titan wants the flag at 0, Maxwell wants it at 1. Groestl is still
part of Jackpot, but in our implementation only in the 3rd round
in my super secret lab my 3 780 Ti cards currently pull this performance
Code:
[2014-05-05 23:56:28] 3 miner threads started, using 'jackpot' algorithm.
[2014-05-06 00:23:18] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 56563 khash/s (yay!!!)
Holy crap, I'd definitely donate extra towards a secret lab binary, you can keep the source, i just want a slice of that sweet, sweet pie o_o
May 05, 2014, 11:26:13 PM
Feel free to ignore or delete this post if you think inappropriate.
Anyone had a chance to run nvidia+cudaminer and ati+cgminer in one computer? Is there a special option or settings for cudaminer?
Anyone had a chance to run nvidia+cudaminer and ati+cgminer in one computer? Is there a special option or settings for cudaminer?
I've ran that in the past...mining yacoin on both 4 r7 240s and a gtx 780.
Just make sure you install the nvidia drivers first, then plug monitor on amd cards and install catalyst.
After that you need to get some dummy plugs and voila.
I don't think it'll work at all using linux.
May 05, 2014, 11:11:29 PM
Feel free to ignore or delete this post if you think inappropriate.
Anyone had a chance to run nvidia+cudaminer and ati+cgminer in one computer? Is there a special option or settings for cudaminer?
Anyone had a chance to run nvidia+cudaminer and ati+cgminer in one computer? Is there a special option or settings for cudaminer?
May 05, 2014, 10:27:24 PM
@ C&C or anyone else
Question about CCMiner or issue I am having.
Does anything else special need to be installed installed on the computer to run properly?
On my rig 1 I have 3 750ti's and 1 670 and everything runs smooth as butter.
On rig 2 I have 5 750ti's and I can not get over 500 kh/s on any card whether I run them individual, all together or in groups.
I basically copied the folder from rig 1 to rig 2 and made .bat files. I just changed the -d on rig 2 in the bat files to correspond to the gpu's. Here is my example:
ccminer50.exe -a mjollnir -d 0
ccminer50.exe -a mjollnir -d 0,1,2
Question about CCMiner or issue I am having.
Does anything else special need to be installed installed on the computer to run properly?
On my rig 1 I have 3 750ti's and 1 670 and everything runs smooth as butter.
On rig 2 I have 5 750ti's and I can not get over 500 kh/s on any card whether I run them individual, all together or in groups.
I basically copied the folder from rig 1 to rig 2 and made .bat files. I just changed the -d on rig 2 in the bat files to correspond to the gpu's. Here is my example:
ccminer50.exe -a mjollnir -d 0
ccminer50.exe -a mjollnir -d 0,1,2
my question is how does it run smooth when gtx670 with ccminer50?
ccminer50 is for maxwell gpu
That was for the 750 ti's. The 670 runs on ccminer30.exe
If you are sure, that the devices specified with -d are correct and the 670 IS NOT INCLUDED, then plz check your cpu-usage. Is this the limiting factor?
On rig you have 5x 750Ti and no other Cards? then specify: "ccminer50.exe -a mjollnir -t 5 -d 0,1,2,3,4" (maybe you don't Need -d Option, if you're using every Card in the System, but I'm not sure, didn't test it).
Christian
@ Chris84
Thanks.
It seems the problem was from solo mining with the cpu. Once I turned it off and ran the bats again all was fine.
May 05, 2014, 10:26:10 PM
Total n00b question: in CCminer is there any way to reduce the "size" of the work you get from the pool? Instead of having to do 80M hashes in one submit to break that up into say 10 hashes of 8M each. Or is that just a function of difficulty? Lots of Jackpot blocks are being solved in the 8-20 seconds it takes for me to submit my work back to the server and I'm not getting credit because I didn't get mine in before the block was solved
May 05, 2014, 08:51:10 PM
awesome. Thanks 
May 05, 2014, 08:46:32 PM
Compute 3.5 - http://files.crimsonskulls.co.uk/ccminer%20-%2005-05-14%20-%20compute%203.5.zip
Compute 3.0 - http://files.crimsonskulls.co.uk/ccminer%20-%2005-05-14%20-%20compute%203.0.zip
Compute 2.0 - wont compile for some reason?
guys i dont know if i changed the groestl stuff properly so use on jackpot only please
Compute 3.0 - http://files.crimsonskulls.co.uk/ccminer%20-%2005-05-14%20-%20compute%203.0.zip
Compute 2.0 - wont compile for some reason?
guys i dont know if i changed the groestl stuff properly so use on jackpot only please
Thanks for the compile! Still haven't had the time to tech myself how to do this yet.
My 750ti rig went from a maximum 2.9 mh/s to a massive 3.7 mh/s and is averaging at 3.5 mh/s. Much appreciation there.
Unfortunately, my 660ti rig losses hashes this build. I go from 3.9 mh/s on Christians last official binary (x86) to 3.4 mh/s on this new release. Double checked to make sure I used the right compute value too. Either way, NP complaints though, so cheers
what is wrong with my bat file? can you give me an example bat for the new jackpot 3.5? thanks i am using 750 ti's
ccminer50.exe -a jackpot -o stratum+tcp://us-east1.jackpotcoin.miningpoolhub.com:20484 -u user -p pass
try removing '50.' should be ccminer.exe
May 05, 2014, 08:38:36 PM
Compute 3.5 - http://files.crimsonskulls.co.uk/ccminer%20-%2005-05-14%20-%20compute%203.5.zip
Compute 3.0 - http://files.crimsonskulls.co.uk/ccminer%20-%2005-05-14%20-%20compute%203.0.zip
Compute 2.0 - wont compile for some reason?
guys i dont know if i changed the groestl stuff properly so use on jackpot only please
Compute 3.0 - http://files.crimsonskulls.co.uk/ccminer%20-%2005-05-14%20-%20compute%203.0.zip
Compute 2.0 - wont compile for some reason?
guys i dont know if i changed the groestl stuff properly so use on jackpot only please
Thanks for the compile! Still haven't had the time to tech myself how to do this yet.
My 750ti rig went from a maximum 2.9 mh/s to a massive 3.7 mh/s and is averaging at 3.5 mh/s. Much appreciation there.
Unfortunately, my 660ti rig losses hashes this build. I go from 3.9 mh/s on Christians last official binary (x86) to 3.4 mh/s on this new release. Double checked to make sure I used the right compute value too. Either way, NP complaints though, so cheers
what is wrong with my bat file? can you give me an example bat for the new jackpot 3.5? thanks i am using 750 ti's
ccminer50.exe -a jackpot -o stratum+tcp://us-east1.jackpotcoin.miningpoolhub.com:20484 -u user -p pass
May 05, 2014, 07:01:16 PM
it was a copy&paste from our internal SVN repo where we use a different filename, sorry.
that did the trick, thank you May 05, 2014, 07:00:00 PM
little note bud.. __shfl_up does not exist on Fermi class GPU's (compute 2.0 devices)
so no amount of screwing around compiling will ever mean anything.. it won't work it's as simple as that.
chubner knows this VERY well too.. you can't find any docs online that talk about shuffle with a lot of warnings saying pre-Kepler cards can't do it.
game over for guys running various 5xx cards when they put v7 of ccminer out they put a note on GitHub saying the dropped Fermi and 64bit support.
So we have to find something else to do with our cards now.. hopefully the same procedure down the line does not keep happening too. (device support dumping)
be kind off gay to be dropping support for older cards in favor of a faster speed on the newest ones only..
I'm out of my league on Cuda compared to these guys though i have not invested the time and energy learning it like these guys have.
you also need a propensity for math i think and i sux at math
All i know is it's a drag hearing about guys running Nvidia cards doing 20mh's or what ever when mine won't hash at all
so no amount of screwing around compiling will ever mean anything.. it won't work it's as simple as that.
chubner knows this VERY well too.. you can't find any docs online that talk about shuffle with a lot of warnings saying pre-Kepler cards can't do it.
game over for guys running various 5xx cards when they put v7 of ccminer out they put a note on GitHub saying the dropped Fermi and 64bit support.
So we have to find something else to do with our cards now.. hopefully the same procedure down the line does not keep happening too. (device support dumping)
be kind off gay to be dropping support for older cards in favor of a faster speed on the newest ones only..
I'm out of my league on Cuda compared to these guys though i have not invested the time and energy learning it like these guys have.
you also need a propensity for math i think and i sux at math
All i know is it's a drag hearing about guys running Nvidia cards doing 20mh's or what ever when mine won't hash at all
To save C&C the time of responding, since I haven't done much for the nvidia crowd lately:
__shfl is fundamental to some of the optimizations that are being done for newer cards, and it makes it possible to take very different design approaches than is possible if you have to go through shared memory.
There aren't a lot of other API changes that are as important for crypto. I doubt any of us will stop supporting Kepler/Maxwell any time soon, but dropping Fermi is probably the right thing to do for the long term.
Jump to: