Deeponion sems s a nice project but i thought that airdropers were thousands and not a couple of hundreds.
True but the real bottleneck here is the number of quality posters on bitcointalk and not "draconian" airdrop rules. FWIW, I have heard other signature campaign managers complaining, that they can't find enough quality posters for their campaigns. They have tons of applicants, but many of them are nothing but spammers. Moreover, DO airdrop rules actually follow bitcointalk official guidelines for signature campaigns that
requires campaign managers to ban all spamming accounts.
Of course, there are some things that might help:
- speed up verification process of blacklisted accounts, so that users that break airdrop rules without malicious intentions can join back as soon as possible
- lift off registration date rule (though this is certainly a double edge sword)
The quality of the exchanges also do not help DO to became popular outside DO community.
The announcement thread is two month old. What do you expect? Bittrex and Coinbase?
But i see no members talking about this matters, because i think DO airdropers have afraid of talking openly about the flaws of the project. Are afraid of beeing removed from airdrop campain.
I have the same feeling from reading some of posts here and it troubles me a bit. No project can move forward without constructing criticism. I understand that people spreading FUD, misinformation... etc deserved to be banned from airdrop. But at the same time, constructing criticism should be encourage at every step of the way.
