I saw a thread that introduces new rules for posting. I find it really strange that 1st dev reduces post length from 100 to 50 and now he fights one line posters.
The airdrop technique is good to make DeepOnion popular but I think it's better to focus on tech now, instead of trying to find bad posters (which is hightly subjective). Many 1 liners have much better posts than long bullshit posts without any meaning.
The airdrop technique is good to make DeepOnion popular but I think it's better to focus on tech now, instead of trying to find bad posters (which is hightly subjective). Many 1 liners have much better posts than long bullshit posts without any meaning.
I want to raise my question again, probably dev missed it and I'd like to hear his point of view on this topic.
If a person will check the posts and not a crawler, I think it's a bad idea. Equal rights, very clear rules - that's what I liked from the very start.
The question is: why DeepOnion moves towards centralization (moderator will decide if your post are good or bad or you're a spammer)? And why the rules change so often?
I like the project and I don't want it to loose it's initial benefits. I want this project to stay a true airdrop and not to turn in actual bounty campaign where manager checks your posts and decide your reward.
Well, its pretty simple. It isn't just 1 moderator, its a team of us that go through the posts. Spamming posts are pretty glaringly obvious when you see them. The rules have been tweaked, adjusted, and improved due, in large, because of scammers and cheats. If you're putting a half decent level of effort into your posts, you have nothing to worry about.
