[ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65% - page 785.

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: polanskiman on June 28, 2014, 11:13:16 AM

Viewing this:

The Money supply is stating 458032.03345200, which means 8032.03345200 coins generated in the past 2 days since PoS started. How is this possible? It seems a rather large amount for a short period of time.

i would say a rather small amount of coins and a sign the real big coin holder didnt unlock their wallets until yet for POS

thats good if not all mint at same timeframe the network protection of POS minting is spread more around the 7 days min age

i did expect up to 100000 DMD being minted in first month
but it seems much more coin-age got burned by transactions than i was thinking

please remember people are able cash in all their gathered coin-age now

450000 /2 (average coinage for around a year)
225000
- destroyed coin-age by transactions (~50%)
-------------
~100000 DMD POS rewards who wait to be minted

it seems still so many people dont understand POS and coin-age
and burn their coin-age by leave coins on exchange or transfer them around

remember u gather no coin-age for coins on exchange
once coins got transfered into ur wallet they start gather coin-age again at zero
(every transaction burns all coin-age of involved coins)

i tell people since months buy the cheap diamonds
and transfer them to ur wallets and leave them there gathering coin-age

who followed that advice should have some nice POS payouts

utahjohn

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

SGminer beta 5. Windows 7 X64 (I have not tested this yet)
https://mega.co.nz/#!9BYBCIpb!9u-UdMe9h3SV_6ifqTsCpI1PkTiXdBzLoxModwfbKb4

popshot

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 554

CEO Diamond Foundation

Quote from: polanskiman on June 28, 2014, 11:13:16 AM

The Money supply is stating 458032.03345200, which means 8032.03345200 coins generated in the past 2 days since PoS started. How is this possible? It seems a rather large amount for a short period of time.

How is that strange? People PoS'ed and in some respect, coin age for certain Diamond holders must have been massive after months and months of gathering.

Clearly something went wrong if you got fat 0, but.. it's still better than if you got skinny zero. Wink

pokeytex

legendary

Activity: 1504

Merit: 1002

Quote from: popshot on June 28, 2014, 05:39:44 AM

Quote from: utahjohn on June 28, 2014, 05:23:00 AM

ROFLMAO
http://i.imgur.com/n356CdF.gif

Just like polanskiman, porting blockchain doesn't really work, I tried various combinations but each time failed to make a difference. I'm afraid that anything other then a wallet fix won't cut it.

Having wallet either permanently opened or permanently closed seems to be the only way of not risking getting the error.

I agree with GiGa, that there is no point in hiding transactions such as in DRK. Popularity of Bitcoin for a wider market really took off after Silk Road bust when it stopped being associated with illegal trade.

Can some other person confirm that Cryptsy withdrawals work.. has anyone managed to deposit Diamonds there?

Popshot - I tested it this morning - I bought some diamond and sent it to my wallet with no problems. I did not send diamond to cryptsy though.

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Viewing this:

The Money supply is stating 458032.03345200, which means 8032.03345200 coins generated in the past 2 days since PoS started. How is this possible? It seems a rather large amount for a short period of time.

Code:

18:38:48

getinfo


18:39:44

{
"version" : "v2.0.2.1",
"protocolversion" : 60006,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : CENSORED,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 465704,
"moneysupply" : 458032.03345200,
"connections" : 16,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "CENSORED",
"difficulty" : 42.65972325,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1403801640,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"unlocked_until" : 0,
"errors" : ""
}

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: pikuchato on June 28, 2014, 10:41:31 AM

so..... now what? are we waiting for a new wallet?

I guess we are.

pikuchato

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Activity: yes

so..... now what? are we waiting for a new wallet?

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: popshot on June 28, 2014, 10:17:26 AM

These net amounts is the way PoS calculates rewards, it can come up with wild numbers but what matters is the final output you get.

Which seems to be a big fat 0.00 DMD (zero) Cheesy

but I guess I am not the only one.

popshot

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 554

CEO Diamond Foundation

These net amounts is the way PoS calculates rewards, it can come up with wild numbers but what matters is the final output you get.

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: popshot on June 28, 2014, 05:39:44 AM

Quote from: utahjohn on June 28, 2014, 05:23:00 AM

ROFLMAO
http://i.imgur.com/n356CdF.gif

Just like polanskiman, porting blockchain doesn't really work, I tried various combinations but each time failed to make a difference. I'm afraid that anything other then a wallet fix won't cut it.

Having wallet either permanently opened or permanently closed seems to be the only way of not risking getting the error.

I agree with GiGa, that there is no point in hiding transactions such as in DRK. Popularity of Bitcoin for a wider market really took off after Silk Road bust when it stopped being associated with illegal trade.

Can some other person confirm that Cryptsy withdrawals work.. has anyone managed to deposit Diamonds there?

If a blockchain post dating the PoS is used to sync then the assertion error happens at the wallet launch. That's what I think, and that's why the foundation wallet you uploaded doesn't work. Same error happen if I use a pre-PoS blockchain that would have been synched and now up-to-date. That's why the Original.rar blockchain you uploaded works and also those who have a blockchain backup pre dating PoS.

polanskiman

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: hallared on June 28, 2014, 09:29:44 AM

I have a lot of question marks in my wallet from minting transactions (which I guess is what you call orphans), so I partly have the same issue as Ruleland in post 1524 (page 77). Haven't seen an answer to this yet so....

Yes these are orphans and for some reason they are being recorded. I believe it's a blockchain itself and can be cleaned.
If we didn't have to deal with assertion error cleaning blockchain would have been our number one priority.
Try running -repairwallet (after making a wallet.dat backup) and see if it helps. I had that issue in the beta wallet but the problem went away, and know how annoying it is to see these /?/ transactions.

We'll try to address all this with the wallet fix .. for now the best medicine for our suffering is the sight of eagerly multiplying Diamonds. Wink

Those orphans were originally not. I had several transactions showing as minting and all had already been confirmed 4 or 5 out to 6 times. Once I closed the wallet and the assertion problem started then the question marks were to be seen everywhere. I have around a total of 6.5 coins in 5 transactions now showing with a question mark. Strangely when I look at the transaction details this is what I see:

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 26/6/14 23:07
Debit: 0.00 DMD
Net amount: -100.193741 DMD

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 26/6/14 23:10
Debit: 0.00 DMD
Net amount: -15.071244 DMD

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 26/6/14 23:13
Debit: 0.00 DMD
Net amount: -6.999485 DMD

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 26/6/14 23:22
Debit: 0.00 DMD
Net amount: -5.002354 DMD

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 27/6/14 00:16
Debit: 0.00 DMD
Net amount: -5.006789 DMD

What do those net amounts mean and why are they negative?

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: hallared on June 28, 2014, 09:29:44 AM

Hello.

I have a lot of question marks in my wallet from minting transactions (which I guess is what you call orphans), so I partly have the same issue as Ruleland in post 1524 (page 77). Haven't seen an answer to this yet so....

Is there a way to get rid of these question marks? Do they disappear if I try to use the -repairwallet command? Or will this be fixed in the next wallet release maybe?

This is not really a big deal because everything else works fine, but I would be grateful if someone could enlighten me. Thank you in advance.

In the mean time I will lean back in my comfy armchair while the diamonds multiply in my wallet Grin

if u change ur wallet.dat against a old backuped one u wont have this
the right blockchain dont have this orphan blocks and ur wallet have saved it as atempts which got not accepted

one thing that help avoid orphans is dont unlock wallet for minting if u on wrong blockchain or not finished with sync wallet

its a cosmetic issue

u dont lose the coin-age from orphan POS atempts

hallared

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 101

The hen or the egg

Hello.

I have a lot of question marks in my wallet from minting transactions (which I guess is what you call orphans), so I partly have the same issue as Ruleland in post 1524 (page 77). Haven't seen an answer to this yet so....

Is there a way to get rid of these question marks? Do they disappear if I try to use the -repairwallet command? Or will this be fixed in the next wallet release maybe?

This is not really a big deal because everything else works fine, but I would be grateful if someone could enlighten me. Thank you in advance.

In the mean time I will lean back in my comfy armchair while the diamonds multiply in my wallet Grin

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

can confirm withdraw diamonds from cryptsy is working

just used the unfortunate wallet crash low crytsy DMD price to buy few more cheap diamonds

everything bad have a good side too if used the right way

and everyone can see clear that pos is working great at least i can confirm it

this temporary wallet crash blpckchain issue when u close it will be fixed asap

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: digi123 on June 28, 2014, 02:57:13 AM

However I have also added maxconnections=1 in the conf. file. cryptonit advised this in post 1528 however it has caused the download to slow down so much that I want to take it out as it will take forever to download. Without this it downloads fast. Will it matter to take it out?

Thanks

hi digi123

i only suggest it if u have a near finished blockchain

i did run into 412 error too today Angry

i just copied my backup diamond folder and resynced with following conf into right blockchain

rpcuser=diamondrpcuser
rpcpassword=diamondpass
logtimestamps=1
#genproclimit=10
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
#noirc=1
rpcport=17772
rpcallowip=192.168.1.*
addnode=193.68.21.19
maxconnections=50

# to disable PoS
#reservebalance=9999999

# our "test" net

# for more logging
debug=1
#printcoinage=1
#printcreation=1
#printpriority=1
#printstakemodifier=1
#printcoinstake=1
#printfee=1
#printjunk=1

most important delete peers.dat before u start wallet or u risc sync into wrong chain

regarding 412 error once u restart wallet its top priority again sorry for the inconvenience this somehow slipped through betatest big creates
(i still dont undertstand how this wasnt be dedected in beta and will try improve test sets and quality checks in future)

shveicar

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1013

DMD info: https://diamond-info.github.io/

Quote from: cryptonit

btw any ideas for a 1 year diamond event?

The best gift of all is: normal wallet + advertising company capitalization growth Diamond

And on the main page http://bit.diamonds, you can place some sort of demo video clip, it helped to draw attention new people.

Quote from: popshot

I agree with GiGa, that there is no point in hiding transactions such as in DRK.

This is not about hidden fees. The conversation was about the safety of their own savings, which will attempt to control the government.

popshot

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 554

CEO Diamond Foundation

Quote from: utahjohn on June 28, 2014, 05:23:00 AM

ROFLMAO
http://i.imgur.com/n356CdF.gif

Just like polanskiman, porting blockchain doesn't really work, I tried various combinations but each time failed to make a difference. I'm afraid that anything other then a wallet fix won't cut it.

Having wallet either permanently opened or permanently closed seems to be the only way of not risking getting the error.

I agree with GiGa, that there is no point in hiding transactions such as in DRK. Popularity of Bitcoin for a wider market really took off after Silk Road bust when it stopped being associated with illegal trade.

Can some other person confirm that Cryptsy withdrawals work.. has anyone managed to deposit Diamonds there?

cryptonit

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1053

bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: shveicar on June 28, 2014, 01:15:29 AM

Perhaps you did not notice that cryptsy is in the United States (at any time, the government may prohibit them from trading). First they said that verification is required only for those who are going to trade in the dollar pairs. And now they say they do impose limits for not verified users. In your understanding of a professional approach? Then they will begin to delay payments. This will be the scenario the exchanges mtgox.

I don't think so. The US government just sold today 30 000 BTC in a public auction...

Second, 40% of the bitcoin nodes are in the USA: https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/ - let's get our facts right...

Third, we have to start coming out of this pseudo-anonymity that can only hurt crypto-currency in the future.

Let the exchanges know who you are... Bitstamp requires it, your bank requires it, your partner-in-life requires it....

That is why I am completely against any DRK, VRC, or any alt-coins that wants to hide their identity on the blockchains. They won't last... like Silk-Road. An interesting/appealing concept, but, it won't last long....

thx giga

that are exact the points why diamond avoid any features that could lead to troubles once cryptocoins are legalized and regulated by government laws

its also the point why we stay on bitcoin based code and not play around with alternative blockchains

we think longterm and wana place us in a position to be a legal wealth storage option for investors outside the small crypto community

yes diamond have a hard birth multiple times in a row we run into troubles

but we allways continue we fix it and improve

and for the timeframe we plan ahead diamond is still in its early steps a fresh born coin

even if most other coins would call us a methusalem who have soon its first birthday

btw any ideas for a 1 year diamond event?

utahjohn

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

ROFLMAO

http://i.imgur.com/n356CdF.gif

digi123

full member

Activity: 236

Merit: 100

Quote from: utahjohn on June 28, 2014, 04:17:03 AM

Quote from: digi123 on June 28, 2014, 04:13:08 AM

O.k thanks utahjohn,

With the checkpoint what should I be looking for to know it is correct.

{
"synccheckpoint" : "000000005babbddb5baad7bb9632738ab901b2f9eb3acfd2f390b2f4a97f1eee",
"height" : 463183,
"timestamp" : "2014-06-26 16:46:41 UTC"
}
Note there may be a newer one ... post what you get and I'm sure many will check it ...

It's going much faster now with more connections.

I will post the checkpoint when its done, will take awhile still so probably tomorrow.

Thanks

Topic: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65% - page 785. (Read 1260636 times)