I wonder if businesses who deal with such sensitive data that they need to have a high degree of anonymity and security are interested in buying technology or prefer to roll their own. Because if their standards are that high they need to audit the code, which might be just as much work as creating it.
Also, if they cannot audit the code they need to trust a black box, which is a security flaw. If they can audit the code, they can also copy the code, and if it is any good, sell it by themselves.
Also, if they cannot audit the code they need to trust a black box, which is a security flaw. If they can audit the code, they can also copy the code, and if it is any good, sell it by themselves.
These are all good objections, however even if the source is available is not going to be very easy or immediate to use it and make it your own. Most of the company want to have a ready solution rather then maintain their own, because it costs a lot of money without counting all the risks you take.
The code could get audited by a third party company.
. That whitepaper is insane.
