After the very beautiful day of yesterday then the very bad day of today, do you think the value of ebtc will increase again? In a few days ? Some months ?
Although its only speculations but the chance of ebtc rising is way possible than it crashing right now because many are coping tokens based on it and small investors holding in near future when token be available on some bigger exchange rise of this token will happen. 
Topic: [ANN] eBTC | The New (ERC20) Bitcoin - page 370. (Read 264728 times)
I'm not spreading fud but I want to ask a serious question.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
You look like a skeptical guy like that who bought a pizza for 10,000 BTC, LOL ... I want to ask you a question: What launched crypto that came with your perfect code and without defect?
Now I want a good argument saying that I am wrong.
lol oh man the 10,000 BTC pizza guy. Nobody wants to be that guy.
After the very beautiful day of yesterday then the very bad day of today, do you think the value of ebtc will increase again? In a few days ? Some months ?
I'm one of those who got lucky enough to enter the project through etherdelta on 0.001 eth/ebtc and managed to sell some ebtc on 0.002 eth/ebtc. I honestly think that this project has no value at all for the time being, but hey, bitcoin also initiated with the same condition. People can all have their arguments on whether or not this project is done, but the great wall of china was not built in a week 
.
That said, i am a HODLER right now for this token. Not much though.
In the meantime, you might all want to check HOWL token. Who knows what this HOWL token will bring you all in the future
.
Best of luck for my fellow HODLER.
.That said, i am a HODLER right now for this token. Not much though.
In the meantime, you might all want to check HOWL token. Who knows what this HOWL token will bring you all in the future
.Best of luck for my fellow HODLER.
I'm not spreading fud but I want to ask a serious question.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
You look like a skeptical guy like that who bought a pizza for 10,000 BTC, LOL ... I want to ask you a question: What launched crypto that came with your perfect code and without defect?
Now I want a good argument saying that I am wrong.
Come to think of it, I can't actually think of a single successful crypto project that launched with such a defect. Since you brought it up, tell us a successful project that had such a severe, or even moderate, flaw in their code.
I could be wrong and, if so, please educate me.
OK, now I understand your point of view. And I share your wish regarding the future of the eBTC project. And I'm sorry I do not have the article to show you, but you can find it on the web, it may take a while, because the reason for this failure happened a few years ago.
From what you say, you can see that you were not at the beginning of the BTC, where found a serious fault in the security of the BTC and even its creator abandoned the project, and that's where I wanted to go, and I ask you again: The community abandoned project BTC because of that? They had every reason to quit because there really was a serious flaw in the security of the BTC and they did not abandon it. The "serious failure that you are talking about is not about security but about limiting or not the currency". So I say you're seim doing FUD, please stop it, just stop.
I'm not spreading fud, we're having an intellectual conversation about the coin. If the project is to be a success, and I hope it will be, then the issues have to be confronted.
Do you have an article where I can read about the flaw in BTC code?
OK, now I understand your point of view. And I share your wish regarding the future of the eBTC project. And I'm sorry I do not have the article to show you, but you can find it on the web, it may take a while, because the reason for this failure happened a few years ago.
I'm not spreading fud but I want to ask a serious question.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
You look like a skeptical guy like that who bought a pizza for 10,000 BTC, LOL ... I want to ask you a question: What launched crypto that came with your perfect code and without defect?
Now I want a good argument saying that I am wrong.
Come to think of it, I can't actually think of a single successful crypto project that launched with such a defect. Since you brought it up, tell us a successful project that had such a severe, or even moderate, flaw in their code.
I could be wrong and, if so, please educate me.
Dude, if you read the updates you would know.
Read the updates. Id point you where to find it but you Miauiiing like a pregnant cat is just FUD and doomsday prophetic.
Whatever will happen noone knows because this is unprecedented. 1st eth based btc so who can say. Chill, buy and hosl or leave the boat and join a more credible project like dogecoin.
If the dev is not planning to do anything further, then we will take over the project and build apps around it. Let me know who all are interested. Dev please respond if you have bigger plans in pipeline. We don't want this great coin to just become another ethereum token.
I'm not spreading fud but I want to ask a serious question.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
You look like a skeptical guy like that who bought a pizza for 10,000 BTC, LOL ... I want to ask you a question: What launched crypto that came with your perfect code and without defect?
Now I want a good argument saying that I am wrong.
Come to think of it, I can't actually think of a single successful crypto project that launched with such a defect. Since you brought it up, tell us a successful project that had such a severe, or even moderate, flaw in their code.
I could be wrong and, if so, please educate me.
From what you say, you can see that you were not at the beginning of the BTC, where found a serious fault in the security of the BTC and even its creator abandoned the project, and that's where I wanted to go, and I ask you again: The community abandoned project BTC because of that? They had every reason to quit because there really was a serious flaw in the security of the BTC and they did not abandon it. The "serious failure that you are talking about is not about security but about limiting or not the currency". So I say you're seim doing FUD, please stop it, just stop.
I'm not spreading fud, we're having an intellectual conversation about the coin. If the project is to be a success, and I hope it will be, then the issues have to be confronted.
Do you have an article where I can read about the flaw in BTC code?
I'm not spreading fud but I want to ask a serious question.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
You look like a skeptical guy like that who bought a pizza for 10,000 BTC, LOL ... I want to ask you a question: What launched crypto that came with your perfect code and without defect?
Now I want a good argument saying that I am wrong.
Come to think of it, I can't actually think of a single successful crypto project that launched with such a defect. Since you brought it up, tell us a successful project that had such a severe, or even moderate, flaw in their code.
I could be wrong and, if so, please educate me.
From what you say, you can see that you were not at the beginning of the BTC, where found a serious fault in the security of the BTC and even its creator abandoned the project, and that's where I wanted to go, and I ask you again: The community abandoned project BTC because of that? They had every reason to quit because there really was a serious flaw in the security of the BTC and they did not abandon it. The "serious failure that you are talking about is not about security but about limiting or not the currency". So I say you're seim doing FUD, please stop it, just stop.
interesting concept! best of luck to you dev, hope its a great success!
I'm not spreading fud but I want to ask a serious question.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
You look like a skeptical guy like that who bought a pizza for 10,000 BTC, LOL ... I want to ask you a question: What launched crypto that came with your perfect code and without defect?
Now I want a good argument saying that I am wrong.
Come to think of it, I can't actually think of a single successful crypto project that launched with such a defect. Since you brought it up, tell us a successful project that had such a severe, or even moderate, flaw in their code.
I could be wrong and, if so, please educate me.
An interesting project just like BTE.
HODL you Skyllywags,HODL! Look what Avalanche we caused by launching the new BItcoin(yes i really beleive this),now imagine what we can accomplish with proper development and bigger exchanges....HODL!
I'm not spreading fud but I want to ask a serious question.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
Isn't this just a ERC20 token with a severe flaw in the code? I don't appreciate how it has anything more to do with BTC than SOIL coin or any other random ERC20 token but this one comes with baggage. Don't the new "e" tokens kind of ruin the credibility of eBTC?
I hope some can explain how I'm wrong.
You look like a skeptical guy like that who bought a pizza for 10,000 BTC, LOL ... I want to ask you a question: What launched crypto that came with your perfect code and without defect?
Now I want a good argument saying that I am wrong.
Time to HODL HODL and HODL...Haters will keep hating coz they missed out on Airdrop!
We will be millionaire one day, 8,100 millionaires to be made in this airdrop!!
Let's create world records together!!!
Let's create world records together!!!
Yeah it possible...
Don't forget eBTC just only about a week launching, it's now still a baby. eBTC will be bigger day bye day.
eBTC is a Community not company so the price depends to us now.
Have fun and enjoy, this will be our life time salary is.
I will never forget how excited it all get started, I will keep this coin forever.
EBTC will increase because of China who still buy Bitcoin Cash thinking that they are buying the actual bitcoin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W-uGdPHF5M
U can create 100s of E coins. But there will be only one king. EBTC !
Please stop. eBTC is only a ERC20 token. Nothing more.That's your attitude, it's the same retarded attitude of some talking badly about BTC at first, so shut up.
Joined Good luck to the project
Good luck to the project Jump to: