Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] EntropyCoin [ENC] Scrypt-N - page 38. (Read 63061 times)

full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
May 23, 2014, 10:30:00 PM
Berric, thank you! Please post wallet address or PM me to receive bounty.

Thank you :-)

PMed
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
May 23, 2014, 10:18:23 PM
Berric, thank you! Please post wallet address or PM me to receive bounty.
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
May 23, 2014, 10:15:49 PM
http://enc.0feepool.com/


0% Fee pool online
PROP reward system.
Stratum with vardiff.
Stable SSD Server, DDOS protection.
Cashout are processed every minute.
EMail Support
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
May 23, 2014, 09:57:15 PM
wow, that was fast.

I just posted here not 30 seconds ago
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623082.new#new

Thank you!
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
May 23, 2014, 09:47:20 PM
Just a moment, Pool will be online soon...
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
May 23, 2014, 09:37:14 PM
Some lucky bastards caught ENC for ridiculously low price.

@dev What do you think about establishing prize/bounty for creation of more ENC pools? Is it a good idea?

I wish that was me.

I bet the reason for no pools is scrypt-n.

Maybe you should announce in the mining forum -- [need pools] scrypt-n diff 1.1.

And remove that swisscex link. The removed ENC from their voting page.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
May 23, 2014, 06:19:54 PM

I have been trying to contact a ton of pools. So far I have had no luck. I would offer 10,000 ENC to the next pool to come online.
sr. member
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
Inactivity: 8963
May 23, 2014, 04:37:35 PM
Some lucky bastards caught ENC for ridiculously low price.

@dev What do you think about establishing prize/bounty for creation of more ENC pools? Is it a good idea?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
May 23, 2014, 12:51:36 AM
Another desperate looser nerd sold millions at 4 satoshi just cause he wasn't patient enough to wait for another exchange to load (it takes a few milliseconds -- but the desperate looser did not have patience).
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
May 22, 2014, 11:26:30 PM
When it comes to anything outside computer technicals, nerds are inherited dumb. It's their design flaw -- they cant do anything else.

Look at the sell orders in cryptoaltex for instance. Someone placed an order or 15282.18909423 coins at 987 satoshis, even though the next big order was at 1098 satoshi. It made perfect sense to place an order for 1097 satoshi, but as we know the geek was desperate. Desperate when it comes to women, food, living, and now even trading.
sr. member
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
Inactivity: 8963
May 21, 2014, 11:41:58 AM
Some lucky guys buying it cheap again Wink
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
May 21, 2014, 11:04:25 AM
Some desperate looser nerds selling it cheap again.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
May 20, 2014, 11:26:57 AM
ENC missing on swisscex voting page.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
May 18, 2014, 09:23:01 PM
As we can see, ENCs are expensive. Buy orders price increasing.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
May 18, 2014, 08:48:50 PM

If you would like to include the current Entropycoin network stats on a website, the following is available:
Code:

Great work on the voting! We are number 8 on Mintpal and in the top 5 on SwissCex!
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
May 18, 2014, 04:25:39 AM
Yes, the PastBlocksMass is every 2 blocks. This was introduced from Spain Coin when the upgrade was made to Scrypt-N (as you can see in the code). The actual difficulty retarget should be every block.

Great job. This coin cannot be killed by a 51%

Quote
If a crypto has fast difficulty re-targets, it's difficulty to do a 51% attack, cause in the forked chain the difficulty will increase rapidly and will soon reach the target block times, the block time of the main chain will be the same, making a 51% attack impossible.
            
If the main chain's difficulty was high cause of the attacker's majority hashing power, it'll drop to sustain a block interval equal to the attacker's fork chain.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
May 18, 2014, 03:50:09 AM

We're number 9 in the Mintpal voting list out of 400!

https://www.mintpal.com/voting#ENC
sr. member
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
Inactivity: 8963
May 17, 2014, 05:10:09 PM
Thank you! Now everything is clear.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
May 17, 2014, 04:56:14 PM

I see the issue. It was initially set to one minute blocks. With the update to Scrypt-N, this value is overriden in the kimoto gravity well implementation. It looks like we missed that in the update. I apologize for this, there were a lot of code changes in that update. We could switch this back in the next release or just leave it where it is. For now, I will update the post to reflect.
sr. member
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
Inactivity: 8963
May 17, 2014, 04:18:58 PM
I noticed something weird. Stats from the pool says:
Quote
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Network)   2 minute 25 seconds
but in specs is stated
Quote
1 minute blocks

If you count number of blocks per day it appears that data from the pool are correct (block every 2 minutes), but on the first page of the topic and on official page it is 1 minute per block. Why?

Explain this to me like I'm a 6 year old.

Pages:
Jump to: