https://support.binance.com/hc/en-us/articles/360004910291
That is different token but has the same ticker that's why it creating confusing into the mind of the people who are thinking this token is get listed on Binance and they are making airdrop there.
So who is more eligible to use EON symbol on the exchange? from what we know EXSCUDO first sets EON as their coin symbol
And now a new token appears using the same symbol EON of course this will confuse the user.
If I may suggest exscudo should abandon the EON ticker symbol since it is not officially on the market yet. EOS platform has a fast-paced devs around them and it is more attractive because of its airdrop bonanza. Exscudo for its testing phase must come up with catchy symbol and must have also a marketing gimmick after all the delays and a year long of waiting for the investors.
Yes it seems you're right, EXSCUDO should find another ticker so there's no double ticker on the exchange. I have also sent a PM about this to the OP so they will take action immediately.
That would the next path to go to. This is the result of them being too slow to develop that even to start the trading on dex hasn't started even after a year. If it had been executed earlier, there wouldn't have this issue of ticker now. The change of ticker will result to another mainnet launch and stress testing.
I'm beginning to think they are in cahoots with those EON(EOS) to prolong all these. Seem a long term scam to me.
I do not think that they really are in any kind of collusion, although this version sounds very interesting. This is more of a coincidence, because there are fewer and fewer variants for a unique name on the market, so the team should also hurry, but with their speed of development, they can miss everything. But I hope that this will not be so, and everything will be fine.