i agree, we know, some of project getting hype for 1-3 years after launch. but they getting lower volume year by year and than goin no volume, no community. We know, many projects out from ETH chain, but, its doesn't mean ETH chan too bad. All of projects have a plan include ETH founder and team.
It's hard to understand why a project with a public founder has more chances to be successful than an anonymous one... Many projects have fake people and fake identities as in Linkedin, no one verifies an identity, so I could be the president of the moon and for them is fine.... So the same for twitter ( just an email verification) and for telegram... even worst...
If this had to be valued in the crypto market, BTC would have never created what we are discussing now...we need to thank anonymous people that brought us this technology and only whoever wants to show themselves now, they do because they want more popularity.
My personal opinion is that we should judge the project itself and no who we think is behind a project. This is a new market. We have projects with successful managers in Tlc or food supply that now are in the crypto world... Do you think this is a guarantee of success?