Stock exchange response -
Support (chief):
Baшa тpaнзaкция нa дaнный мoмeнт нe имeeт пoдтвepждeний. T.к. и блoкэкcплopep нe гpyзитcя, вepoятнa пpoблeмa ceти. Baм cтoит oбpaтитьcя к paзpaбoтчикaм мoнeты.
Boт дaнныe нoды
(Your transaction at the moment has no confirmation. Because And blockexplorer is not loaded, the network problem is likely. You should contact the coin developers.
Here are the nodes)
"amount" : 134781.93297886,
"confirmations" : 0,
"txid" : "7bc9e159868a057cb5cd3cdfddcf78bf76aeb4b41450d24c9db8831c076bac51",
"normtxid" : "855b4495937bf08c0000cf987696663f7d62f31e6d40355651de5916684be28c",
I can now see that transaction in my client's local mempool. It's a biiiig one (~170k) as I suspected. I'll see if I can make some changes to incorporate larger transactions, and mine some blocks. No guarantees it will work.
(I guess the question to ask now is - why does the Fastcoin client with default settings create transactions this large, so large that they will be ignored by a miner with default settings...)
I want to clarify what I have to do in my situation?
I've spent about 12 hours mining FST to try to push this transaction (or any stuck tx) through.
I think there are two fundamental issues.
1) The client spends around 5 seconds building the block framework (incorporating mempool transactions) before any mining work can be started for that block. This is fine when your coin has 60 or 600 seconds block spacing, not so great when it's every 12 seconds. That's 5 of every 12 seconds (41%) wasted waiting for the client to create the block.
2) It's possible that the network won't accept the larger blocks. The couple of blocks that I did successfully mine (nb I should have found 100+ in that time) were orphaned not long after my solution was found.
At this point the fastcoin dev(s) don't seem to be interested in further technical discussion of the issue, at least in this thread. I've spent some time on this, but I don't get anything out of it (I have no stake in FST; I'm just a guy wandering threads). I would have liked it if my attempts had worked, but unfortunately it seems like it's going to be very difficult, or maybe even impossible, to confirm your transaction. I don't think I can assist any further. Sorry.
your efforts and input are always greatly appreciated and interesting in my book
considering how small, tiny the transaction fee is compared to the value of fst it's incredible for all these years there have bene no probs (in my book), miners are so important
I guess like btc in the very early days it was dedicated, miners, hobbyists, and again you could at least mine directly from qt wallet I think in early days
what will help is when the value goes up to reasonable value which will happen relatively soon imo
I mean multiple cents to 2 digit cents
a lot of coins never went through the early lows and hard work and had overinflated values
like ltc, i remember when went on btce , people were buying on forum if people would accept paypal and not be scammed , then was around 30-40 cents for short time then straight to $1 and never came down
lee working for coinbase etc
so we have done hard way but have a very solid coin, with all the right fundementals
problem is when you have general public essentially buying dogshit like ripple, and not understanding what theyre buying
bittrex would be good i guess but have seen them delist coins with 40+ btc a day and more, like xst, so they can't be trusted, they are just interested in the next token
polo has major red flags and many traders talking of lost coins, stolen funds etc
tbh we need to have more volume but the steady price and gains, past few days when other coins are dying shows people don't want to sell we are in an accumalation faze, i feel like whales are buying up so sell at your peril
end of day i like cryptopia and livecoin and we have FST/USD with livecoin and should promote more
our target audience has to be new investors, traders and merchants, again via usd route, then they don't get sidetracked with having to buy btc first and other coins