Hi, very interesting idea to use mining power for useful computations. My only worry is are these computations useful? I mean you tell us we are "helping" to cure cancer. Is there any evidence of that? can we see the output of our calculations or something?
thanks
Absolutely, I have been asked this many times. First off the pure data is provided by Stanford upon request by any certified medical researcher as FAH is a non profit. But Stanford itself also writes medical papers on the results which can be found here
http://folding.stanford.edu/home/papersNow many people say "I cant read those papers, so how do i know they are legit?" and here is my response to that:
You trust a plumber to do the right thing in the correct manner when he comes to your house. You cant possibly know if he is doing the right thing as plumbing would not be a profession of yours. The way you can find out if he is doing the right work would possible be through word of mouth and other customer reviews.
The papers that are in that link I am not going to lie to you, are way over my head. I do not fully understand what is being done, I just know the 101 version like many of you. We have talked with some other bio chemists about the work and they think its great and they approve. But unless you understand the papers in the link, it would be unfair to say that FAH isnt doing anything.... Think of them as your plumber
And like the plumber, we would need to use a source comparable to "Angies list" for other people to tell us about how they do, not what they do precisely. Here
https://folding.stanford.edu/home/awards/ is a list of awards that they have on their website that they have achieved from respectable organizations but the one I can recognize is found here
http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/11/24/nvidia-foundation-awards-400000-to-two-teams-pioneering-cancer-research/ its an award from Nvidia.
Now Nvidia is up my alley, they trust that FAH is doing good work so therefor I trust their judgement. Communities relay on other peoples professions and the trust that we must put into them. As a data specialists I once told a customer not to run a data line on his own at 400 feet as signal will be dropped and data can only go 300 feet on cat 5e. I told him he needs a repeater or fiber. He didn't listen, he thought it was just like cat 3 (he was an old school pre-cat 5 phone guy) and it could go 1000 feet. Sure enough I was out there 3 weeks later installing an second cabinet for networking equipment.
Moral of the story, its good to do due diligent on things you are looking to support, but trust the good sources and take their word for it.