We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some.
After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.
I think you will like what you see
The market is sluggish but why this is used as an excuse not to do the ICO, each project will certainly think of existing funds and funds raised. If indeed this FST has more funds with a project without ICO, that means the FST and the team have the ability to develop FST coins independently. Is that so?