Topic: [ANN] [GDGC] GadgetCoin | IoT | M2M |Smart Contracts on Hardware (Read 88533 times)

The community has voted and decided to lock this thread. Most likely we will reopen it in the near feature as a moderated thread. Please email me at [email protected] or send a message in the wallet to the gdcfoundation account if you have any questions about GadgetCoin. Alternatively, please feel free to PM me here at the BCT forum. I will check my messages regularly. We invite all VICR contract holders to a private forum to continue the discussion about the project. We are releasing the system and start working with clients and businesses to generate revenue. We will keep all VICR contract holders and interested parties updated in the GadgetNet private forum.


DEVELOPERS!

We are recruiting developers to work on the W3C open source intiative at https://github.com/w3c/web-of-things-framework. All type of skill set and expertise are welcomed and will be useful. You need only a Github account to start working on the project. W3C is an influential technology organisation, it defines worldwide standards. Most likely will be the dominant standard for M2M and humans to machine communication. That means your work would make a real difference in a very important software development process. Also, your work will be directly exposed to the world largest companies, the participants of the standardization process.
As a side project you could also work with us on the GadgetNet software development which scope is bigger than the W3C code base, but mirrors most of the W3C source. We are willing to offer share options and eventually salary to the developers who are interested in working with us and can contribute. Please email me at [email protected] if you are interested. Thanks!

This is good, an immature person like altcoinUK would bring more bad than good. Well, let's go back to the main topic of this thread.

thanks a lot!!! iI read again and you didn't say you worked for a company in 1997, you just said you developed software from 1997. 17 years old often develop software. it was my mistake, sorry!!

altcoinuk is not a developer, and as far as I know gadgetcoin doesn't have a promo/marketing team.

Oh, really? I got a strong feeling that altcoinUK was a part of the promo/marketing team. Sorry.

We posted many times in this thread that altcoinUK is not part of the developer team, he is not representing GadgetCoin. I am sorry for the tone of this thread, the attacks and accusation on your projects. Such opinion is not the view of the GadgetCoin developers. We have nothing but respect for your software development.

Anonymity is not a problem for me, it's just a way to prove that altcoinUK is a liar. I'm 36 yo, but I didn't work in 1997, I finished university in 2002.

PS: Young looking face is a problem, I have to show my passport buying beer.

i don't care you are anonymous or not, but i am very concerned about both my GadgetCoin and IOTA investment and i am reading everything about both projects  in the last two days. i see the accusation about anonymity is a problem for you.   if you don't mind asking, I read you said you worked for a game company as a programmer in 1997. it means you must be at least 40 years old. you published your picture in the IOTA thread 3 days ago. The picture shows a 30 years old guy. which one is you, the programmer who started to work in 1997 or the young guy in the picture? or it is you but the picture is old? or the programmer who worked in 1997 is the other JINN programmer his name is triangle?

I suggest to move this offtopic into a separate thread, otherwise it will be a PR disaster. Or altcoinUK should change the nickname while representing GadgetCoin.

It's ok it's not so important. I don't have JINN. I have only Gadgetcoin, XMR, LTC, BTC and IOTA.

Reality denial, hm, I hope you don't have mental issues. I don't want people saying that I went hard on a disabled person.

Would you stop this nonsense please? I mean, you are of course a free man and you can talk here, but if you are more than 16 years old then you should understand this:

There is no significant improvement and of course there is no breakthrough in microprocessor design in the last 25 years. All major instruction sets (RISC, CISC, EDGE, EPIC, MISC, etc) has been around for a while and the combined over US$ 10 billion R&D budget per year of Intel, AMD, Samsung, Motorola, TI and IBM couldn't produce any new architectural design in the last 20 years. Despite the most brilliant engineers and scientist are employed by those R&D departments there is no manufacturable breakthrough whatsoever. And then comes a 24 years old boy from Scandinavia with absolutely zero experience in the industry and an anonymous java developer from Belarus. All experience they have is the "successful" scam of NXT, and these two (again with zero experience in the most difficult field of technology) announce that they will deliver a revolutionary, game changer, asynchronous microprocessor design. They announce this on a Bitcoin talk forum to collect money from a few idiots who due to lack of experience and common sense in fact "invested" in these two scammers by believing that these two will sell a new microprocessor and then pay dividends. Now, if you see this in the Silicon Valley TV comedy then this is a hilariously funny story, but these two wankers actually pulled out this scam with real people's real money.
Of course they will never ever deliver any microprocessor. JINN was a a pathetic and desperate lie to get out money from the greedy and delusional crowd.

The story is same with IOTA. There is no profitable IoT startup exists, all IoT startups are on the life line of angel an VC investments as the large service integrators and manufacturers keep the revenue source for themselves. No IoT startup could come up with a sustainable monetization strategy yet nor could build a sustainable IoT business (no wonder the GadgetNet team couldn't as well and has little chance to succeed). No problem, here comes again the 24 years old boy and the anonymous Belarusian. Now Internet of Things is the sector in which they have absolutely zero experience, and therefore the outcome will be naturally the same as with JINN: nothing will be delivered except the Pump & Dump of IOTA, which I guess makes happy tobeaj2mer01, albert_mt and yourself because you make a handsome "ROI". Again, my question remains: who will be the fucking bagholders at the end of the process?

This paper kinda tell that it will be possible to write software for their ternary computer if it ever be implemented/assembled. Nothing more, nothing less.

I bet noone takes your words seriously after it was exposed that you are a liar. What you are doing now is just trying to distract the attention from this sad fact. Don't waste your time, accept the consequences of your deeds as a man.

For details you should contact David, make sure you can provide a proof that you own JINN. We don't give information to those who don't own JINN.

Nobody with an IQ higher than the one of a doorknob, would call Come-from-Beyond a scammer.
AltcoinUK is a stressed, unsuccessful wannabe investor. He should leave this thread and IMO it would be best if the GadgetCoin devs could buy his stake back. Loudmouthed haters that imply a strong connection to GadgetCoin will do nothing but harm this project.

altcoinUK you can go now.

And of course nobody believes this bollocks, except a few delusional cheerleader in your circle.
There is no context exists in which Bitcoin could be substituted with NXT. You wish your NXT scam would be legit and be in the same league with BTC but of course that could never happen. Regardless of the sad state of Bitcoin, regardless that central banks, retail banks and the government slowly but surely take control over Bitcoin, Satoshi's innovation is still a remarkable innovation and a serious technology project. Bitcoin is a serious business and economic experiment, it is actually used in the real world outside of this pathetic scam driven altcoin microcosmos. On the other hand, your NXT scam is a money collecting jamboree to ride the Bitcoin waves and lure out money from the idiots. Same as JINN and IOTA. Case is closed. You can go now.

Thank you for your reply.
I am more confused now from this code, it's like a Chinese text to me
I read in the forum that JINN investors expected you design a processor, sell it and pay dividend from the processor sale. is the code at the link part of the processor design, will you sell this code? sorry, I am not a programmer. I just want understand what can the investors expect from IOTA if all money goes to JINN and it is not possible to deliver JINN.
no hard feeling. I know the rules, only invest what you can afford to lose.

We manufactured pieces of the prototype but decided not to publish the info to keep the project in stealth mode. altcoinUK's accusations are not worth losing stealth advantage, he is just one of many guys with big mouth, why should we care?

Edit: I think I can show one proof, because it's public anyway:

http://homepage.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/ternary/libtern.shtml

I agree. It's good barabbas, Come from Beyond and everybody else can post freely in this thread. I voted NO. Please don't close the thread.