Dev please clear this up, thanks.
+1
Topic: [ANN] GlideSEC Asset | Secured & Profitable NXT Investments | System Launch - page 19. (Read 42352 times)
April 20, 2015, 11:53:46 AM
April 20, 2015, 11:02:15 AM
All interesting stuff....
But still why dump it for only a few BTCs when you own the market and can easily make 100 BTC? just think of it?
But still why dump it for only a few BTCs when you own the market and can easily make 100 BTC? just think of it?
when ?
April 20, 2015, 10:29:46 AM
All interesting stuff....
But still why dump it for only a few BTCs when you own the market and can easily make 100 BTC? just think of it?
But still why dump it for only a few BTCs when you own the market and can easily make 100 BTC? just think of it?
April 20, 2015, 07:16:24 AM
Dev please clear this up, thanks.
April 20, 2015, 06:54:21 AM
NXT-7A7N-NKUY-F8WA-EVLCX - wallet C-Cex ))))
Those coins were bought at around 2 nxt each. How is it that they are dumping at 1,6K?
all users balance Glide and Cell transfer to one acc on c-cex
look transfer history
April 20, 2015, 06:43:44 AM
NXT-7A7N-NKUY-F8WA-EVLCX - wallet C-Cex ))))
April 20, 2015, 06:07:16 AM
ActualUpsurge,
The main problem right now is that the coin is not trading in a major exchange. Please, don't say that it's just a matter of paying some btcs to get this asset listed at bittrex. Afak that's not the way they work and they stated yesterday that they don't support currently trading of nxt assets in their exchange. I don't know if cryptsy does, but I don't consider them a very relevant exchange anymore. IMO the only sensible option left is poloniex. You mentioned before that they had solicited some documentation in order to list glidesec. Could you please tell us investors current state of this conversation with polo?
In addition to taking glidesec to polo, another thing that could be done, as it has been previously discussed, is to decrease the total supply. There are too many coins left and demand is low.
These are some honest questions and proposals from a current glidesec investor.
The main problem right now is that the coin is not trading in a major exchange. Please, don't say that it's just a matter of paying some btcs to get this asset listed at bittrex. Afak that's not the way they work and they stated yesterday that they don't support currently trading of nxt assets in their exchange. I don't know if cryptsy does, but I don't consider them a very relevant exchange anymore. IMO the only sensible option left is poloniex. You mentioned before that they had solicited some documentation in order to list glidesec. Could you please tell us investors current state of this conversation with polo?
In addition to taking glidesec to polo, another thing that could be done, as it has been previously discussed, is to decrease the total supply. There are too many coins left and demand is low.
These are some honest questions and proposals from a current glidesec investor.
This is also what i told him, maybe use the dividend payment to lower the total supply, two days ago the dividend was 18% when the coin was trading at 3000Sats. When you decrease 4,200,000 by 18% then that will be already in the good direction. All the new coins have around 1,000,000 coins available even less. Not saying that it should be dropped to 1,000,000 coins but a drop to 3,000,000 or 3,500,000 would be a good move. The number of coins will drop, so the % dividend per coin will raise, and price will raise too.
The second group of shares hasn't been sold yet, so at least, 4,200,000 - 380,000 shares have yet to be sold. That's a lot of shares for current demand.
This is my beef. See you think there are only 380k shares right now. But there are 864,619 GLIDE released. The majority of which was released in the last 2-3 days. 167k+ off market.
EDIT: you can see dev's shares in this link:
https://nxtblocks.info/#section/assets_exchange/stakeholders/10813939830153169076
Their wallet is NXT-PAYL-8T56-TN6N-458RJ (the first one) and currently is holding 3,335,381 shares.
Yeah exactly they are holding 3,335,381 and that means 870k are in circulation. Let me explain the buy high sell low.
Lets say im the dev. I put a sell wall of 100k GLIDE up for 1 NXT per. I then get on a different wallet and buy that GLIDE with 100k NXT. Now I have 100k GLIDE and 100K NXT. So if I go dump that glide for much cheaper I still made a stupid amount of money with no risk and basically its free BTC.
April 20, 2015, 05:23:32 AM
Is Bittrex considering to list this coin?
April 20, 2015, 04:58:03 AM
ActualUpsurge,
The main problem right now is that the coin is not trading in a major exchange. Please, don't say that it's just a matter of paying some btcs to get this asset listed at bittrex. Afak that's not the way they work and they stated yesterday that they don't support currently trading of nxt assets in their exchange. I don't know if cryptsy does, but I don't consider them a very relevant exchange anymore. IMO the only sensible option left is poloniex. You mentioned before that they had solicited some documentation in order to list glidesec. Could you please tell us investors current state of this conversation with polo?
In addition to taking glidesec to polo, another thing that could be done, as it has been previously discussed, is to decrease the total supply. There are too many coins left and demand is low.
These are some honest questions and proposals from a current glidesec investor.
The main problem right now is that the coin is not trading in a major exchange. Please, don't say that it's just a matter of paying some btcs to get this asset listed at bittrex. Afak that's not the way they work and they stated yesterday that they don't support currently trading of nxt assets in their exchange. I don't know if cryptsy does, but I don't consider them a very relevant exchange anymore. IMO the only sensible option left is poloniex. You mentioned before that they had solicited some documentation in order to list glidesec. Could you please tell us investors current state of this conversation with polo?
In addition to taking glidesec to polo, another thing that could be done, as it has been previously discussed, is to decrease the total supply. There are too many coins left and demand is low.
These are some honest questions and proposals from a current glidesec investor.
This is also what i told him, maybe use the dividend payment to lower the total supply, two days ago the dividend was 18% when the coin was trading at 3000Sats. When you decrease 4,200,000 by 18% then that will be already in the good direction. All the new coins have around 1,000,000 coins available even less. Not saying that it should be dropped to 1,000,000 coins but a drop to 3,000,000 or 3,500,000 would be a good move. The number of coins will drop, so the % dividend per coin will raise, and price will raise too.
The second group of shares hasn't been sold yet, so at least, 4,200,000 - 380,000 shares have yet to be sold. That's a lot of shares for current demand.
This is my beef. See you think there are only 380k shares right now. But there are 864,619 GLIDE released. The majority of which was released in the last 2-3 days. 167k+ off market.
April 20, 2015, 04:18:14 AM
GLIDE as concept looks like great investment, it also seems that they are really delivering - dividends, so it works, I really dont understand why is price collapsing, has anyone theory?
1. Too many coins.
2. Small buy support.
3. Dividends are not promoted even throw medias like twitter
4. Missing whales but that is linked to point 2
People don't like coins with small buy support as they know that they bought it but are not sure that they can sell it.
April 20, 2015, 04:08:40 AM
GLIDE as concept looks like great investment, it also seems that they are really delivering - dividends, so it works, I really dont understand why is price collapsing, has anyone theory?
April 20, 2015, 03:43:26 AM
ActualUpsurge,
The main problem right now is that the coin is not trading in a major exchange. Please, don't say that it's just a matter of paying some btcs to get this asset listed at bittrex. Afak that's not the way they work and they stated yesterday that they don't support currently trading of nxt assets in their exchange. I don't know if cryptsy does, but I don't consider them a very relevant exchange anymore. IMO the only sensible option left is poloniex. You mentioned before that they had solicited some documentation in order to list glidesec. Could you please tell us investors current state of this conversation with polo?
In addition to taking glidesec to polo, another thing that could be done, as it has been previously discussed, is to decrease the total supply. There are too many coins left and demand is low.
These are some honest questions and proposals from a current glidesec investor.
The main problem right now is that the coin is not trading in a major exchange. Please, don't say that it's just a matter of paying some btcs to get this asset listed at bittrex. Afak that's not the way they work and they stated yesterday that they don't support currently trading of nxt assets in their exchange. I don't know if cryptsy does, but I don't consider them a very relevant exchange anymore. IMO the only sensible option left is poloniex. You mentioned before that they had solicited some documentation in order to list glidesec. Could you please tell us investors current state of this conversation with polo?
In addition to taking glidesec to polo, another thing that could be done, as it has been previously discussed, is to decrease the total supply. There are too many coins left and demand is low.
These are some honest questions and proposals from a current glidesec investor.
This is also what i told him, maybe use the dividend payment to lower the total supply, two days ago the dividend was 18% when the coin was trading at 3000Sats. When you decrease 4,200,000 by 18% then that will be already in the good direction. All the new coins have around 1,000,000 coins available even less. Not saying that it should be dropped to 1,000,000 coins but a drop to 3,000,000 or 3,500,000 would be a good move. The number of coins will drop, so the % dividend per coin will raise, and price will raise too.
The second group of shares hasn't been sold yet, so at least, 4,200,000 - 380,000 shares have yet to be sold. That's a lot of shares for current demand.
Ok, but DEV doesn't have to change his big picture of the coin here. Reducing the number of coins is always a good sign as this will give more and more people interest in buying the coin. There are so many options that can be done here. I'm tweeting Cryptsy too, as believe me, cryptsy has the most number of investors and a listing on Cryptsy will put this coin to 20,000sats even without reducing the number of coins.
April 20, 2015, 03:05:25 AM
ActualUpsurge,
The main problem right now is that the coin is not trading in a major exchange. Please, don't say that it's just a matter of paying some btcs to get this asset listed at bittrex. Afak that's not the way they work and they stated yesterday that they don't support currently trading of nxt assets in their exchange. I don't know if cryptsy does, but I don't consider them a very relevant exchange anymore. IMO the only sensible option left is poloniex. You mentioned before that they had solicited some documentation in order to list glidesec. Could you please tell us investors current state of this conversation with polo?
In addition to taking glidesec to polo, another thing that could be done, as it has been previously discussed, is to decrease the total supply. There are too many coins left and demand is low.
These are some honest questions and proposals from a current glidesec investor.
The main problem right now is that the coin is not trading in a major exchange. Please, don't say that it's just a matter of paying some btcs to get this asset listed at bittrex. Afak that's not the way they work and they stated yesterday that they don't support currently trading of nxt assets in their exchange. I don't know if cryptsy does, but I don't consider them a very relevant exchange anymore. IMO the only sensible option left is poloniex. You mentioned before that they had solicited some documentation in order to list glidesec. Could you please tell us investors current state of this conversation with polo?
In addition to taking glidesec to polo, another thing that could be done, as it has been previously discussed, is to decrease the total supply. There are too many coins left and demand is low.
These are some honest questions and proposals from a current glidesec investor.
This is also what i told him, maybe use the dividend payment to lower the total supply, two days ago the dividend was 18% when the coin was trading at 3000Sats. When you decrease 4,200,000 by 18% then that will be already in the good direction. All the new coins have around 1,000,000 coins available even less. Not saying that it should be dropped to 1,000,000 coins but a drop to 3,000,000 or 3,500,000 would be a good move. The number of coins will drop, so the % dividend per coin will raise, and price will raise too.
April 20, 2015, 01:43:48 AM
Guys, in fact there is no reason to FUD on this one. DEV delivered his dividend, so everything is moving like it should be moving, if you are unhappy about the coin price then maybe you need to start buying more, average down etc.
For example :
GRID was a coin that was trading like crazy, and i bought it at 10k sats, and it dropped to 3ksats, complaining, no? Buying, now it hit 50k sats. Unhappy with the 2400sats when you bought at 10,000 sats, don't be , buy 4 times more coins and wait till it is 20000sats when it hit Bittrex or Cryptsy.
Just some advance here.
For example :
GRID was a coin that was trading like crazy, and i bought it at 10k sats, and it dropped to 3ksats, complaining, no? Buying, now it hit 50k sats. Unhappy with the 2400sats when you bought at 10,000 sats, don't be , buy 4 times more coins and wait till it is 20000sats when it hit Bittrex or Cryptsy.
Just some advance here.
April 20, 2015, 01:40:34 AM
DEV,
What do you think of a little buyback and destroy those coins. The price is dirty cheap so you don't have to spend a lot of BTCs for your buyback, decrease the number of coins, increase coin price, and increase marketcap.
Some people are waiting to buy because of the number of coins. When dividend was around 18% when it was trading at 3000sats, then why not just reduce the number of coins by 18%
What do you think of a little buyback and destroy those coins. The price is dirty cheap so you don't have to spend a lot of BTCs for your buyback, decrease the number of coins, increase coin price, and increase marketcap.
Some people are waiting to buy because of the number of coins. When dividend was around 18% when it was trading at 3000sats, then why not just reduce the number of coins by 18%
That is very much a possibility!
Roadmap soon, and we will have an open discussion, as my investors come first.
You just blew me off two days ago when I raised concern investors don't mean shit to you as long as they buy.
FUD will not be tolerated, and will be deleted, please change your tone.
i think that's forum it's FREE ( why you delete
?? ) April 20, 2015, 01:39:32 AM
DEV,
What do you think of a little buyback and destroy those coins. The price is dirty cheap so you don't have to spend a lot of BTCs for your buyback, decrease the number of coins, increase coin price, and increase marketcap.
Some people are waiting to buy because of the number of coins. When dividend was around 18% when it was trading at 3000sats, then why not just reduce the number of coins by 18%
What do you think of a little buyback and destroy those coins. The price is dirty cheap so you don't have to spend a lot of BTCs for your buyback, decrease the number of coins, increase coin price, and increase marketcap.
Some people are waiting to buy because of the number of coins. When dividend was around 18% when it was trading at 3000sats, then why not just reduce the number of coins by 18%
That is very much a possibility!
Roadmap soon, and we will have an open discussion, as my investors come first.
You just blew me off two days ago when I raised concern investors don't mean shit to you as long as they buy.
FUD will not be tolerated, and will be deleted, please change your tone.
April 20, 2015, 01:35:28 AM
DEV,
What do you think of a little buyback and destroy those coins. The price is dirty cheap so you don't have to spend a lot of BTCs for your buyback, decrease the number of coins, increase coin price, and increase marketcap.
Some people are waiting to buy because of the number of coins. When dividend was around 18% when it was trading at 3000sats, then why not just reduce the number of coins by 18%
What do you think of a little buyback and destroy those coins. The price is dirty cheap so you don't have to spend a lot of BTCs for your buyback, decrease the number of coins, increase coin price, and increase marketcap.
Some people are waiting to buy because of the number of coins. When dividend was around 18% when it was trading at 3000sats, then why not just reduce the number of coins by 18%
That is very much a possibility!
Roadmap soon, and we will have an open discussion, as my investors come first.
You just blew me off two days ago when I raised concern investors don't mean shit to you as long as they buy.
April 20, 2015, 01:34:52 AM
EXCHANGE News ?
we have been getting alot of interest on twitter for a push to bittrex, so we will aim for that over the next few days, worst case scenario we will throw a few BTC at bittrex to get an instant addition, although somehow i dont think it will come to that
Regards
ActualUpsurge
April 20, 2015, 01:31:50 AM
EXCHANGE News ?
April 20, 2015, 01:30:42 AM
DEV,
What do you think of a little buyback and destroy those coins. The price is dirty cheap so you don't have to spend a lot of BTCs for your buyback, decrease the number of coins, increase coin price, and increase marketcap.
Some people are waiting to buy because of the number of coins. When dividend was around 18% when it was trading at 3000sats, then why not just reduce the number of coins by 18%
What do you think of a little buyback and destroy those coins. The price is dirty cheap so you don't have to spend a lot of BTCs for your buyback, decrease the number of coins, increase coin price, and increase marketcap.
Some people are waiting to buy because of the number of coins. When dividend was around 18% when it was trading at 3000sats, then why not just reduce the number of coins by 18%
That is very much a possibility!
Roadmap soon, and we will have an open discussion, as my investors come first.
Jump to: