Can someone send a few HEAT my way to get me started
9473874084346785030
many thanks
Topic: [ANN] HEAT: 3.0 crypto*multisig fiat*a2a hft*1000tps*DSA*PoS+PoP*e2ee chat* - page 134. (Read 418460 times)
February 03, 2017, 07:16:22 PM
February 03, 2017, 07:14:45 PM
I am getting a fatal error, says
java.lang OutOfMemoryError: Ran out of virtual memory on a 32 bit JVM. either use a 64-bit JVM or *reduce* your heap size.
I understand what it mean in concept, but not how to fix it...Did this JVM came with the HEAT build?
I have:
HEAT 1.0.2
Build: 1485988836
THX!
java.lang OutOfMemoryError: Ran out of virtual memory on a 32 bit JVM. either use a 64-bit JVM or *reduce* your heap size.
I understand what it mean in concept, but not how to fix it...Did this JVM came with the HEAT build?
I have:
HEAT 1.0.2
Build: 1485988836
THX!
I don't think it works easily on a 32 bit operating system. Last person who had the error fixed it by installing a 64-bit OS on their computer.
February 03, 2017, 07:08:22 PM
Are the problems people are having just "garden variety"crypto problems , or are they specifically related to heat?
February 03, 2017, 06:49:01 PM
I am getting a fatal error, says
java.lang OutOfMemoryError: Ran out of virtual memory on a 32 bit JVM. either use a 64-bit JVM or *reduce* your heap size.
I understand what it mean in concept, but not how to fix it...Did this JVM came with the HEAT build?
I have:
HEAT 1.0.2
Build: 1485988836
THX!
java.lang OutOfMemoryError: Ran out of virtual memory on a 32 bit JVM. either use a 64-bit JVM or *reduce* your heap size.
I understand what it mean in concept, but not how to fix it...Did this JVM came with the HEAT build?
I have:
HEAT 1.0.2
Build: 1485988836
THX!
February 03, 2017, 06:39:32 PM
February 03, 2017, 06:37:24 PM
Thanks everyone for the help looks like i got mine going finally now as long as it does not get stuck anywhere im good to go lol.
February 03, 2017, 05:21:37 PM
I think we need more nodes.. or what else can we do about that constant forking?
February 03, 2017, 05:05:29 PM
Team Slack took over 
Hopefully Team HEAT could take over... it's like they disappeared.
Too busy trading Bitcoins today probably...
February 03, 2017, 04:08:08 PM
Team Slack took over
February 03, 2017, 03:51:50 PM
So we've decided to back the SuperNet chain? Sure.
What does it matter?It doesn't really.
Only that there's agreement on the chain to follow.
February 03, 2017, 03:51:03 PM
So we've decided to back the SuperNet chain? Sure.
What does it matter? February 03, 2017, 03:44:48 PM
new blockchain dump!
this should help you get back on the heatwallet.com chain
thanks & credit goes to jl777
http://54.221.26.215/ http://54.221.26.215/blockchain-jl777-22936.tgz
this should help you get back on the heatwallet.com chain
thanks & credit goes to jl777
http://54.221.26.215/ http://54.221.26.215/blockchain-jl777-22936.tgz
So we've decided to back the SuperNet chain? Sure.
February 03, 2017, 03:28:59 PM
Do you guys think you'll be added to Poloniex or is your chain too complicated to maintain for a major exchange?
Too early for that discussion. Network currently in infancy and unstable. We are waiting for devs to fix some issues that cause forks and other odd behavior.
February 03, 2017, 03:27:47 PM
new blockchain dump!
this should help you get back on the heatwallet.com chain
thanks & credit goes to jl777
http://heatbrowser.com/
http://heatbrowser.com/report.html
http://heatbrowser.com/blockchain-jl777-22936.tgz
update:
frequent blockchain backups (taken every hour) available at http://heatbrowser.com/blockchain.tgz
if it's broken, try the one from the next hour.
this should help you get back on the heatwallet.com chain
thanks & credit goes to jl777
http://heatbrowser.com/
http://heatbrowser.com/report.html
http://heatbrowser.com/blockchain-jl777-22936.tgz
update:
frequent blockchain backups (taken every hour) available at http://heatbrowser.com/blockchain.tgz
if it's broken, try the one from the next hour.
February 03, 2017, 03:25:32 PM
Do you guys think you'll be added to Poloniex or is your chain too complicated to maintain for a major exchange?
February 03, 2017, 03:05:56 PM
Sometimes I enter my passphrase and it opens a completely different wallet. I dont know why this is. I check for extra spaces before and after and thats not it. After a few try's I am able to open my actual wallet. weird..
That does sound strange.
This reminds me, if you've never sent a transaction from your HEAT account, then the entropy of your account is 64 bits. This could be brute forced in a year or two by a modern supercomputer.
If you send a transaction from your account, then a 256 bit public key will be attached to your account number, making it impossible to brute force.
February 03, 2017, 02:57:10 PM
Well, in PoW mining power decides on consensus. Point is in both cases of PoW and PoS should behaviour would be considered attack on the network. That would look terrible. I rather wait for Supernet release the chain.
Attack??? Not at all. NXT-based PoS allows reorg up to 720 blocks. If anybody is 'attacking' the network, is SuperNet by hijacking chain with high forging stake. Many smaller forgers should band together to force a reorg.
More forgers on more machines is healthier for the network anyway.
February 03, 2017, 02:45:07 PM
We are waiting for the issue to be resolved, before that there is quite little we can do. The Slack-team has not been able to jump aboard the mainchain even if almost every measure has been taken.
Then heat slack team should find the best chain they can and put forging power behind that.
The 'heatwallet' chain is not necessarily the 'main' chain. It looks to have only 3 big forgers. Get enough smaller ones to overtake and force reorg.
That would be terribly unhealthy for the project and could act as a precedent. Seriously, I do not mind Supernet getting couple of additional coins and we should not penalise them for being on the right chain. That would be greed.
Um, in PoS forgers set the chain. That's how the consensus works. They are not necessarily on the 'right' chain if everyone else disagrees. I think having more smaller forgers make up the main chain is far healthier.
February 03, 2017, 02:43:55 PM
24h vol
472,046,944.60006200 BTC
https://heatwallet.com/#/trader/5592059897546023466/0
here is a bug. that cant be true.
472,046,944.60006200 BTC
https://heatwallet.com/#/trader/5592059897546023466/0
here is a bug. that cant be true.
Yeah, that looks very wrong.
Divide by 100000000 (8 zeros). 4.72046944 Looks more reasonable.
February 03, 2017, 02:35:13 PM
how did you delete old blockchain it would not let me
You gotta close the server first, otherwise the files will be in use. Jump to: