Commenting on legitimate concerns with absolutely no answer on my questions and then calling it stupidity at its finest. How ironic.
I have no intention of selling my HEAT any time soon. I always invest long term (sadly one of the reasons why I got burned a lot in the past).
I'm just wondering what the devs reasoning was and is. You obviously can not answer that, so why even bother?
Nothing stopped you from buying your HEAT share with FIMK.
I posted the pricing levels several times in this thread and FIMK was quite often the obvious best buying choice. Just because you were not smart enough to make good trades doesn’t mean the developers should change the rules to match your opinions.
As for original FIMK investors, many were invested because of the team behind it, not the “coin” — it would have been a far bigger mistake to abandon FIMK supporters (Who, quite frankly, seem to have paid for one man year of HEAT development).
All in all, I think the developers found a good compromise.
(And, despite your claims I believe FIMK is far from a dead coin. It’s taking a nap, and grossly undervalued.)
Actually, knowing that the devs would accomplish nothing with my now worthless FIMK stopped me from buying with FIMK. It's not about not being smart enough, it's about funding a project you believe in and hoping it pays off.
I did the same with Lisk, it would've been cheaper to buy XCR first and buy Lisk that way, but I didn't do that because that does not help the development fund at all.
You pretty much made my point with the rest of your comment. It was way cheaper to buy with FIMK than BTC/ETH/NXT indeed. So why reward them again with extra HEAT even though the HEAT put aside for FIMK holders were completely sold out?
I'm sorry for hammering on this and I appreciate your comments, but nobody was able to give me a decent answer and I suggest you leave that to the developers. Only they can explain how they came up with it and how they are going to handle things.
