When an agreement is broken, it is broken. The core issue here is TRUST.
This coin is scam. The dev did not even put much effort in hiding it.
Could one of you please point out where the dev broke the agreement???
The part when they agreed I would run the fund under contract for three months. Its in the PMs I took screenshots of. Dev also said that he would open the fund up BEFORE the PoW ended if we got on a big exchange. So bittrex adds Hyper, dev goes full retard and breaks the agreement. His actions prove he never had any intention of handing over the funds.
I read all of your pm's...he says over and over again that they "may" or "might" do the fund before if it gets on a big exchange,
but he continually stresses "after POW"
So you translate that into meaning that within mere moments of being on a large exchange that the fund would be sent over?
Delusional much? or just wanted to get your hands on it as fast as possible?
There is a difference between listening and hearing what you want.
I never asked for the coins when it got listed on Bittrex. As soon as it got listed on Bittrex the dev msged me and told me that my fee was too high. Clearly after he saw the price of Hyper being over 10k satoshi.
Yes, I read what you said.
What you fail to realize is whether or not that was his intention or the reason he wanted to renegotiate is neither here nor there.
He approached you to renegotiate and you did not like the deal. There is nothing against a contract to try and renegotiate. He can say he was not going to pay you until the cows come home. That is when you hold your ground, but instead you accepted a counter offer that eliminated your original contract.
If you would have held your ground and he did not send the fund after POW then you would have a legitimate argument.
Now if you believe that you did not agree to a renegotiation, then you broke the contract by revealing what was to be confidential within it.
Either way you screwed yourself. No matter what his intention was or cause thereof.
That is how a court of law would see it and rule on it..I am certain.
It is very clear cut.
The major issue I have is that you then threw a fit and damaged the coin on purpose, after you covered your ass first with your high sale.
And you only threw the fit when you believed you would not get the coins you expected because we will never know what would have happened if you held your ground. Then your greed revealed itself.
You know my points. Case closed on my end. I can not explain in any clearer.