Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [ICO] Moonlight | Decentralized Workforce Platform For The Smart Economy - page 10. (Read 1558 times)

newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
How accurate is the information that Moonlight will use a special algorithm to guarantee the necessary set of skills and experience for potential project participants. ?!
I think that in this way it will be possible to select the best of the best, the correct solution!
This is such a mini test for proficiency. I think that having read the resume that the robots provide is not enough to understand and learn the skills of a person.
The very fact of solving problems will be fixed in the detachment and will represent a kind of credible resume of a specialist. Keep it up, good strategy.
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
How accurate is the information that Moonlight will use a special algorithm to guarantee the necessary set of skills and experience for potential project participants. ?!
I think that in this way it will be possible to select the best of the best, the correct solution!
This is such a mini test for proficiency. I think that having read the resume that the robots provide is not enough to understand and learn the skills of a person.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
 How accurate is the information that Moonlight will use a special algorithm to guarantee the necessary set of skills and experience for potential project participants. ?!
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
Today I read on a medium that Mowlight started the KYC procedure. And the number of investors is not limited, it's cool, usually projects make it  limited.
Yes, I often met that good projects limit the number of investors, and here on the contrary, developers are happy to all who pass the KYC . And I think this is very good, there will be less speculation with the token.
Yes it will be much better than with a phantom, where demand exceeded supply. Resellers will earn a lot on the difference in cost, and the project from this  will get 0. Phantom stupidly done ...
I do not understand why they do this KYC , who will check it))) I think this is a waste of time and money for the project.
This is not a waste of time. Now it is necessary to avoid money laundering by criminals. And every respectful exchanger, requires a list of investors before the  listing.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
Today I read on a medium that Mowlight started the KYC procedure. And the number of investors is not limited, it's cool, usually projects make it  limited.
Yes, I often met that good projects limit the number of investors, and here on the contrary, developers are happy to all who pass the KYC . And I think this is very good, there will be less speculation with the token.
Yes it will be much better than with a phantom, where demand exceeded supply. Resellers will earn a lot on the difference in cost, and the project from this  will get 0. Phantom stupidly done ...
I do not understand why they do this KYC , who will check it))) I think this is a waste of time and money for the project.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
Today I read on a medium that Mowlight started the KYC procedure. And the number of investors is not limited, it's cool, usually projects make it  limited.
Yes, I often met that good projects limit the number of investors, and here on the contrary, developers are happy to all who pass the KYC . And I think this is very good, there will be less speculation with the token.
Yes it will be much better than with a phantom, where demand exceeded supply. Resellers will earn a lot on the difference in cost, and the project from this  will get 0. Phantom stupidly done ...
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 2
Today I read on a medium that Mowlight started the KYC procedure. And the number of investors is not limited, it's cool, usually projects make it  limited.
Yes, I often met that good projects limit the number of investors, and here on the contrary, developers are happy to all who pass the KYC . And I think this is very good, there will be less speculation with the token.
jr. member
Activity: 75
Merit: 1
Today I read on a medium that Mowlight started the KYC procedure. And the number of investors is not limited, it's cool, usually projects make it  limited.
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
The main principles that must be present in good and promising projects are knowledge, security, accessibility, new technologies, without this project there is no chance of life!
Work on the result! this is the main advantage of the project team, it is very inspiring, more such projects!
I am very pleased to realize that I participate in the life of the project, especially successful and updated!
Simplicity is the main thing that I value in the project. I am pleased with the information that is on the Moonlight platform. , will always be presented in a simple and understandable manner so that every trader, novice or experienced, can easily analyze and use the data.
jr. member
Activity: 67
Merit: 1
The main principles that must be present in good and promising projects are knowledge, security, accessibility, new technologies, without this project there is no chance of life!
Work on the result! this is the main advantage of the project team, it is very inspiring, more such projects!
I am very pleased to realize that I participate in the life of the project, especially successful and updated!
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
The main principles that must be present in good and promising projects are knowledge, security, accessibility, new technologies, without this project there is no chance of life!
Work on the result! this is the main advantage of the project team, it is very inspiring, more such projects!
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
The main principles that must be present in good and promising projects are knowledge, security, accessibility, new technologies, without this project there is no chance of life!
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
I got acquainted with all the nuances of the project, appreciated their multifunctionality, I think that something can happen from this. But still I can not understand how it differs from others? What is their zest?
I think that Moonlight does not look like anyone, including LinkedIn. The biggest difference between Moonlight is that they build trustless, .. I think this says a lot about their intentions and plans.
Yes, the difference from LinkedIn is noticeable to the naked eye, guys are doing well, moving in the right direction. But explain to me, a beginner in this field, what is trustless ??
Well, it's very simple, they do not build a trusting ecosystem for project managers, recruiters, customers, and so on. Not trusting means that to confirm their skills and achievements, the participant must provide real facts, and not just display it in the text in his resume.
You know, this is what you need, something new and interesting. Cool is the fact that in the Moonlight ecosystem, the Producers or Customers will create tasks, and the Performers will solve them, demonstrating their skills and talents.
After completing any task, the skills needed to solve this task are fixed for the user and can be used to further confirm his capabilities, so we can see a confirmed developer resume!
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
I got acquainted with all the nuances of the project, appreciated their multifunctionality, I think that something can happen from this. But still I can not understand how it differs from others? What is their zest?
I think that Moonlight does not look like anyone, including LinkedIn. The biggest difference between Moonlight is that they build trustless, .. I think this says a lot about their intentions and plans.
Yes, the difference from LinkedIn is noticeable to the naked eye, guys are doing well, moving in the right direction. But explain to me, a beginner in this field, what is trustless ??
Well, it's very simple, they do not build a trusting ecosystem for project managers, recruiters, customers, and so on. Not trusting means that to confirm their skills and achievements, the participant must provide real facts, and not just display it in the text in his resume.
You know, this is what you need, something new and interesting. Cool is the fact that in the Moonlight ecosystem, the Producers or Customers will create tasks, and the Performers will solve them, demonstrating their skills and talents.
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
I got acquainted with all the nuances of the project, appreciated their multifunctionality, I think that something can happen from this. But still I can not understand how it differs from others? What is their zest?
I think that Moonlight does not look like anyone, including LinkedIn. The biggest difference between Moonlight is that they build trustless, .. I think this says a lot about their intentions and plans.
Yes, the difference from LinkedIn is noticeable to the naked eye, guys are doing well, moving in the right direction. But explain to me, a beginner in this field, what is trustless ??
Well, it's very simple, they do not build a trusting ecosystem for project managers, recruiters, customers, and so on. Not trusting means that to confirm their skills and achievements, the participant must provide real facts, and not just display it in the text in his resume.
jr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 1
I got acquainted with all the nuances of the project, appreciated their multifunctionality, I think that something can happen from this. But still I can not understand how it differs from others? What is their zest?
I think that Moonlight does not look like anyone, including LinkedIn. The biggest difference between Moonlight is that they build trustless, .. I think this says a lot about their intentions and plans.
Yes, the difference from LinkedIn is noticeable to the naked eye, guys are doing well, moving in the right direction. But explain to me, a beginner in this field, what is trustless ??
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
I got acquainted with all the nuances of the project, appreciated their multifunctionality, I think that something can happen from this. But still I can not understand how it differs from others? What is their zest?
I think that Moonlight does not look like anyone, including LinkedIn. The biggest difference between Moonlight is that they build trustless, .. I think this says a lot about their intentions and plans.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
I got acquainted with all the nuances of the project, appreciated their multifunctionality, I think that something can happen from this. But still I can not understand how it differs from others? What is their zest?
newbie
Activity: 92
Merit: 0
this project is really good to follow because the team and the concept of a very good mission is very supportive for the future for its users, success for this project.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
The project really deserves attention, because this problem is very urgent in the modern world, I think the guys will be able to solve many problems that have arisen in the present world.
I think you are right, because the problems themselves will not disappear, you need to solve them, and look for the right thought-out solutions, because at the moment it is difficult to find the right specialists with certain skills in the developers' environment, or they are quickly disassembled.
Yes, because there is a rule that does not allow after a project hires a specialist, this specialist becomes inaccessible to other projects.
Thus, this is bad for employers, and in the future this leads to a further reduction in the number of available specialists.
I believe that this is utter nonsense, since the most correct, as for me, is the joint use of the resource of specialists.
Pages:
Jump to: