I believe you intentionally misspelled the name of prasaga to fish some reaction, because it is actually very easy and take less than five seconds to confirm before you type them. If I may give an advice: stop. You just make yourself looks more and more foolish and childish, and it shows more and more of how bad the quality of the human resources that run this project. And if you say the otherwise, that you're unintentionally misspelled them, well... again, it only took less than 5 seconds to confirm the name, this very fact speaks volume of your quality.
I will not waste my time and effort to confirm if I spelled your project correctly because it's unimportant on this thread. Besides, you should've picked a better name, one that is 'easily memorable and leaves a lasting impression.' So please kindly refrain from hijacking this thread to promote your project.
... may we conclude that your strategy for those big company penetration is "I'll cross the bridge when I'm there"? Means you don't have any plan right now and you prefer to wait and see?
The success of our project
does not rely on 'big company penetration'. Using that logic of yours, you're saying your project will be a failure if you won't get Amazon or Facebook's thumbs up? Ask yourself, does that even make any sense?
Like I already mentioned for the
nth time [which you intentionally ignores for obvious reasons]. We have a PLAN, our plan is focused on "user acquisition through various viral marketing campaigns". Meaning, we will attract users by penetrating the massive population of social media. This is achievable because our brand already carries the potential to go viral as the next 'meme'. We will build our user base and establish PubeCoin as a medium of exchange, as a p2p payment system. For those business who wants to accept PUBE as payments, they can seamlessly integrate it. For those who won't,
it's not a problem at all. So stop judging our project based on that nonsense. Maybe you have no idea what peer to peer means?
One other thing I'd like to point out, though, you keep saying how unique you are, how breakthrough your idea is, that you'll have a massive userbase, and that it'll be accepted widely, goes viral, etc. Yet your website (that you've conveniently quoted for us) said..
Who are the founders of PubeCoin?
Due to the controversial nature of PubeCoin and the disruptive concept that it’s trying to accomplish, the founders of PubeCoin decided to remain anonymous. We believe that revealing our identities will only cause conflict of interests, distractions, and unnecessary attention that will consequently hamper and undermine the success of the project. We aspire to establish a decentralized currency that is truly run and owned by the people, with no leader or figurehead. Hence, we believe it’s of the utmost importance that the creator and creation should not coexist.
So which one is it? You believe your idea is breakthrough and will be accepted widely or is it too controversial that you have to remain anonymous? Ahh... contradiction, you must be loving them so much.
Seriously, you are no longer making any sense. PubeCoin will amass a massive user base no matter how outrageous the name, given the right viral marketing campaign. It will be disruptive and we expect controversies along with it because of its name alone. That's why we choose to be anonymous. Not because we are embarrassed to be associated with the brand or we plan to scam people. But because we are fully aware of the potential of this project. We simply don't want the complications and unwanted attentions of being in the spotlight once our project succeed. Same reasons why Satoshi kept his/her/their identity hidden. We want to establish an amusing cryptocurrency and build an entire community around it. Without a figurehead or names, the entire focus will be on the project alone.