I see their bounty campaign is quite a big hit. Numbers of followers across all of the social media they represent themselves in have increased tenfold.
really? where the rules?
Topic: [ANN] [ICO] Xwin – CryptoBet betting platform based on blockchain - page 94. (Read 13245 times)
January 08, 2018, 10:19:50 AM
January 08, 2018, 10:17:23 AM
I see their bounty campaign is quite a big hit. Numbers of followers across all of the social media they represent themselves in have increased tenfold.
really? where the rules? January 08, 2018, 10:13:15 AM
Following my logic, I think you've missed out on one thing: the more money the project gets, the more it can spend including paying for legal team expenses.
As I understand, legal team expenses are paid from the bet investment, not from total project incomes, so it's more individual, I guess. January 08, 2018, 10:08:24 AM
Interesting suggestion, but what if we go the other way around. What if there was 20% tax, do you think that would work?
I think it wouldn't, because the size of the tax won't affect on your bet and its safety. As I mentioned, the best way to be safe is to have a good investment in legal support. January 08, 2018, 09:54:16 AM
Following my logic, I think you've missed out on one thing: the more money the project gets, the more it can spend including paying for legal team expenses.
As I understand, legal team expenses are paid from the bet investment, not from total project incomes, so it's more individual, I guess. January 08, 2018, 09:42:22 AM
Interesting suggestion, but what if we go the other way around. What if there was 20% tax, do you think that would work?
I think it wouldn't, because the size of the tax won't affect on your bet and its safety. As I mentioned, the best way to be safe is to have a good investment in legal support. January 08, 2018, 09:34:57 AM
Interesting suggestion, but what if we go the other way around. What if there was 20% tax, do you think that would work?
I think it wouldn't, because the size of the tax won't affect on your bet and its safety. As I mentioned, the best way to be safe is to have a good investment in legal support. January 08, 2018, 09:27:40 AM
Why are you biased to this number? Why would some other percentage such as, say, 10% appear more dishonest?
Because according to the size of most bets, 10% of the money is not that much to cover expenses to all important things such as lawyer. January 08, 2018, 09:17:51 AM
Why are you biased to this number? Why would some other percentage such as, say, 10% appear more dishonest?
Because according to the size of most bets, 10% of the money is not that much to cover expenses to all important things such as lawyer. January 08, 2018, 09:13:52 AM
Because according to the size of most bets, 10% of the money is not that much to cover expenses to all important things such as lawyer.
Could you explain in which way are connected size of most bets and law expenses? January 08, 2018, 09:06:26 AM
Because according to the size of most bets, 10% of the money is not that much to cover expenses to all important things such as lawyer.
Could you explain in which way are connected size of most bets and law expenses? January 08, 2018, 08:59:26 AM
That depends heavily on the country, in my opinion. For example, the number of 15% seems wild to me, as in my homeland betting is mostly free from unneeded constraints of law.
I think 15% is a healthy amount. With a lower percent it would probably be a fraud. January 08, 2018, 08:56:28 AM
Betting is a heavily regulated sphere, so it's better to pay more to be safe.
That depends heavily on the country, in my opinion. For example, the number of 15% seems wild to me, as in my homeland betting is mostly free from unneeded constraints of law. January 08, 2018, 08:52:07 AM
Why are you biased to this number? Why would some other percentage such as, say, 10% appear more dishonest?
Because according to the size of most bets, 10% of the money is not that much to cover expenses to all important things such as lawyer. January 08, 2018, 08:45:35 AM
That depends heavily on the country, in my opinion. For example, the number of 15% seems wild to me, as in my homeland betting is mostly free from unneeded constraints of law.
I think 15% is a healthy amount. With a lower percent it would probably be a fraud. January 08, 2018, 08:45:16 AM
That depends heavily on the country, in my opinion. For example, the number of 15% seems wild to me, as in my homeland betting is mostly free from unneeded constraints of law.
I think 15% is a healthy amount. With a lower percent it would probably be a fraud. January 08, 2018, 08:39:43 AM
That depends heavily on the country, in my opinion. For example, the number of 15% seems wild to me, as in my homeland betting is mostly free from unneeded constraints of law.
I think 15% is a healthy amount. With a lower percent it would probably be a fraud. January 08, 2018, 08:38:14 AM
That depends heavily on the country, in my opinion. For example, the number of 15% seems wild to me, as in my homeland betting is mostly free from unneeded constraints of law.
I think 15% is a healthy amount. With a lower percent it would probably be a fraud. January 08, 2018, 08:34:20 AM
Betting is a heavily regulated sphere, so it's better to pay more to be safe.
That depends heavily on the country, in my opinion. For example, the number of 15% seems wild to me, as in my homeland betting is mostly free from unneeded constraints of law. January 08, 2018, 08:23:42 AM
It is written in the whitepaper that you will spend 15 % of ICO funds on lawyer and legal support. Don't you think that that would be an overkill, and you should spend less?
Betting is a heavily regulated sphere, so it's better to pay more to be safe.Jump to: