Probably yes, especially when the critics are to harsh on the team, maybe members can at least go easy on their criticism on the project, after all the team are still doing their best to support the project, only that it hasn't reflect much on price which i know is what many people want to see.
Constructive criticism is fine, as long as it tackles relevant issues within the project and doesn't necessarily paint the whole project bad 'cause that would be just plain FUD.
They hired a new community manager now (since the old one made a fiasco on their old telegram group. LMAO), so I guess any further harsh criticism will be moderated.
I just checked their new updates and it seems the team is still traveling and doing a bunch of conferences.
They are going to Japan visiting the Blockchain for Social Impact and in Switzerland for The ICE at St Moritz Lake and Geneva International Motorshow. Quite a very busy team if I may say.
i am not against constructive criticism but in most cases some people don't really know the different between both, or put in a different way, they don't realize when they start creating fud (indirectly), you realize that 90% of crypto followers are very impatient! how do you communicate with such people when they only want to see immediate growth, as long as the team are still focus on the main objective of the project, that should be good enough,
the above bold sentence should tell you more, apparently, they are trying to avoid those random when this or that type of shit question (just my opinion
)