any new technology takes time to develop and mature, looking forward to Jibrel Network beta wallet and how Jibrel Network can bring crypto to the mass
I sincerely regret the tone of my previous post, but I am very frustrated with this project ... precisely because I was so excited about it from the beginning. Each year I enter with a solid position in 2 projects, this year, JNT was one of them. My identification with their asset tokenization approach was robust, really strong. An expected approach, as the next crypto step, came at a perfect moment.
His initial image was also very attractive. Reputed advisors and contacts of greater interest.
I know perfectly that technology has its cycles, that dabate does not deserve to lose a minute in it.
But I just do not understand how a wallet, after 9 months open to user testing, and of course, I suppose, a team of technicians, may not have received the study and sufficient level of proof to not be supported and openly guaranteed to esast heights of the evolution of the project. IN 9 months only a product can be contrasted and not having done it gives me an impression of sloppiness or dismissal that leaves me stupefied. Precisely with the technical rigor that an approach like Jibrel requires to be reliable. I do not know how something so elementary can be "overlooked" in a project that shows the HIGH LEVEL of this one in other of its faces ... and for that reason I am stupefied.
I hope that a misunderstanding or a failure of attention has been, although it is not explained enough ... but this project must draw a resounding "point and separate" with this lamentable chapter. My impression is that the image has prevailed abroad rather than the strength and technical consolidation of its proposal - that is why I am seriously assaulted by finding the same line of irrelevant communications that seem there only because I do not break the communicative timeline or that of a image backed by extense factors or reputations ... than another where the solvency and robustness of its technical developments are at the heart of its contribution and more at such absolutely elementary levels as a wallet, an explorer, etc ... My impression is that it has neglected that extension of the project, precisely when without it, the project is nothing. I am not inside ... but that is my sincere impression and as such, I transmit it, as a kind of feedback that could serve as an alert. I hope that someone serves as a reflection (and point of inflection, that what I read, has already been contemplated with the increase of technical personnel).
I am supporting the project, although the months until the first development generate serious uncertainty and I know I am taking a considerable risk for it ... but that is not going to be relieved with twits reminders about saving my private keys, about "imminent and mysterious news-bomb ", nor celebrating the global notoriety of the project will have a few venues here and there ... that notoriety is earned with serious and effective work. Same as the support of new partners in the project, both at the level of investment and collaboration.
I sincerely hope the best for everyone and that all this happens as a bad episode that served as a lesson to know exactly where the important thing is.
With this, I close my contribution on this point, because I do not think that giving a thousand laps will help the least, even to the precise work environment to reset the necessary issues ... and the last thing I want is to disturb.
I hope that helps