Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] JOYSO Hybrid-Decentralized Exchange (HEX) is now available on imToken 2.0! - page 4. (Read 1920 times)

jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
ICO Advisor | Top 15 ICOBench Expert
JOY is deemed a utility token. Utility token I understand? what Deemed utility token means?

There are two types of tokens, utility and security tokens but it seems SEC does not like security tokens then utility tokens is now widely chosen and growing up soon. You can search Google to get more sense of these tokens.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
ICO Advisor | Top 15 ICOBench Expert
Hi Team, what is Ropsten Test Network ? What is the benefit to migrate to that network.

Ropsten is a Ethereum testnet.
Almost all the mechanism are the same between Ropsten and Mainnet.
But the Ether on Ropsten does not have market value.
As result, developer will test the function on Ropsten avoid spend too much fees.


That means you have to pay fees for testing on Ether. I thought testnet is free of charge for testing purposes
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
hi. how can i join your bounty? i have filled yoủr form. what must i do now?
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Hi Team, what is Ropsten Test Network ? What is the benefit to migrate to that network.

Ropsten is a Ethereum testnet.
Almost all the mechanism are the same between Ropsten and Mainnet.
But the Ether on Ropsten does not have market value.
As result, developer will test the function on Ropsten avoid spend too much fees.
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 104
Hi Team, what is Ropsten Test Network ? What is the benefit to migrate to that network.
Hi. Ropsten Test network is just a testing environment. Once you have your application ready, you can use it for
blockchain simulations but without any real currency. You can read more about it here: https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/13534/what-is-actually-ropsten-what-is-a-new-network
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 104
One good thing that I see with Joyso is that it us address.g disaster management steps. While so.many ICOs put a disclaimer to handle this subject, Joyso has put a complete plan in place for withdrawal from blockchain in case of disaster.

Can I ask what is an "address.g disaster management" and how does JOYSO applies it? I Google-ed it but can't find any information about it. Thanks!
Hey. I think I messed up while typing on my phone. I just meant to say that JOYSO has mentioned measures to handle cisaster/crisis management.
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 104
JOY is deemed a utility token. Utility token I understand? what Deemed utility token means?

I think you got lost in translation. JOY will be deemed as a utility token.
It means that it will be a utility token. Smiley
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
Hi Team, what is Ropsten Test Network ? What is the benefit to migrate to that network.
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
One good thing that I see with Joyso is that it us address.g disaster management steps. While so.many ICOs put a disclaimer to handle this subject, Joyso has put a complete plan in place for withdrawal from blockchain in case of disaster.

Can I ask what is an "address.g disaster management" and how does JOYSO applies it? I Google-ed it but can't find any information about it. Thanks!

That's also my question to Joy team
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
JOY is deemed a utility token. Utility token I understand? what Deemed utility token means?
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
ICO Advisor | Top 15 ICOBench Expert
I think the proposed fees scheme for order makers and takers are competitive compared to existing exchanges now. However, my question is related to listing criteria. Will you assess tokens/ coins before listing or you will apply voting system like binance any many others now?

A voting system has been proposed and Token will enable that. But I also agree that there should be some due diligence for checking authenticity of ICO and Token listing

That is my point too, checking authenticity of ICO is extremely important as we never know whether the dev team behind the scene is really doing their jobs or just making up things to grab easy money from investors

Yes. But it's hard to tell. These days you have people selling their profiles for ICOs. So checking authenticity is becoming more and more difficult. I hope JOYSO puts in a strong mechanism to counter this

I agree on adding a screening mechanism when deciding which coins to list.  Free and frictionless listing is great, however, I think this should only apply to the ICOs that are authentic.  There are too many scams nowadays, causing people to have extreme losses.

It would make us as investors peace of mind or at least we have a good round for verification
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
ICO Advisor | Top 15 ICOBench Expert
I think the proposed fees scheme for order makers and takers are competitive compared to existing exchanges now. However, my question is related to listing criteria. Will you assess tokens/ coins before listing or you will apply voting system like binance any many others now?

A voting system has been proposed and Token will enable that. But I also agree that there should be some due diligence for checking authenticity of ICO and Token listing

That is my point too, checking authenticity of ICO is extremely important as we never know whether the dev team behind the scene is really doing their jobs or just making up things to grab easy money from investors

Yes. But it's hard to tell. These days you have people selling their profiles for ICOs. So checking authenticity is becoming more and more difficult. I hope JOYSO puts in a strong mechanism to counter this

Great point to raise. Many celebs now are selling their reputation for ICOs
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
One good thing that I see with Joyso is that it us address.g disaster management steps. While so.many ICOs put a disclaimer to handle this subject, Joyso has put a complete plan in place for withdrawal from blockchain in case of disaster.

Can I ask what is an "address.g disaster management" and how does JOYSO applies it? I Google-ed it but can't find any information about it. Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
I think the proposed fees scheme for order makers and takers are competitive compared to existing exchanges now. However, my question is related to listing criteria. Will you assess tokens/ coins before listing or you will apply voting system like binance any many others now?

A voting system has been proposed and Token will enable that. But I also agree that there should be some due diligence for checking authenticity of ICO and Token listing

That is my point too, checking authenticity of ICO is extremely important as we never know whether the dev team behind the scene is really doing their jobs or just making up things to grab easy money from investors

Yes. But it's hard to tell. These days you have people selling their profiles for ICOs. So checking authenticity is becoming more and more difficult. I hope JOYSO puts in a strong mechanism to counter this

I agree on adding a screening mechanism when deciding which coins to list.  Free and frictionless listing is great, however, I think this should only apply to the ICOs that are authentic.  There are too many scams nowadays, causing people to have extreme losses.
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 104
Frankly, with all problems I have faced with many existing exchanges now, HEX would be the best alternative to come. Thank you
I also feel the same. With recent hack on etherdelta, I lost almost 1 eth. Which maybe a small amount for some, but it's huge for me being in a country where 1 eth is enough to survive for an year

Sorry to hear about that. I have been stolen of 1400 CPY yesterday too because of a stupid click but it is a great lesson to choose a reliable platform to work with in the future and security is the top priority now
It's good actually. Since the mapping in Joyso will be done off chain, this problem might not arise. Smart contract will ensure this. I would like to hear more about the additional security features from dev team
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 104
I think the proposed fees scheme for order makers and takers are competitive compared to existing exchanges now. However, my question is related to listing criteria. Will you assess tokens/ coins before listing or you will apply voting system like binance any many others now?

A voting system has been proposed and Token will enable that. But I also agree that there should be some due diligence for checking authenticity of ICO and Token listing

That is my point too, checking authenticity of ICO is extremely important as we never know whether the dev team behind the scene is really doing their jobs or just making up things to grab easy money from investors

Yes. But it's hard to tell. These days you have people selling their profiles for ICOs. So checking authenticity is becoming more and more difficult. I hope JOYSO puts in a strong mechanism to counter this
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
ICO Advisor | Top 15 ICOBench Expert
Frankly, with all problems I have faced with many existing exchanges now, HEX would be the best alternative to come. Thank you
I also feel the same. With recent hack on etherdelta, I lost almost 1 eth. Which maybe a small amount for some, but it's huge for me being in a country where 1 eth is enough to survive for an year

Sorry to hear about that. I have been stolen of 1400 CPY yesterday too because of a stupid click but it is a great lesson to choose a reliable platform to work with in the future and security is the top priority now
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
ICO Advisor | Top 15 ICOBench Expert
I think the proposed fees scheme for order makers and takers are competitive compared to existing exchanges now. However, my question is related to listing criteria. Will you assess tokens/ coins before listing or you will apply voting system like binance any many others now?

A voting system has been proposed and Token will enable that. But I also agree that there should be some due diligence for checking authenticity of ICO and Token listing

That is my point too, checking authenticity of ICO is extremely important as we never know whether the dev team behind the scene is really doing their jobs or just making up things to grab easy money from investors
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
ICO Advisor | Top 15 ICOBench Expert
I think the proposed fees scheme for order makers and takers are competitive compared to existing exchanges now. However, my question is related to listing criteria. Will you assess tokens/ coins before listing or you will apply voting system like binance any many others now?

We will not apply voting system since our architecture is much easier to list than CEXs.
Our market manager will refer to the liquidity on coinmarketcap to list the new ERC20 tokens.



Great to hear that, voting is good but sometimes it causes problems for many investors too as fees incurred. Thanks for clarification
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 104
I agree with you it will be the exchange, plus with a centralized exchange you need to trust them to protect your private key from hackers.
Another feature that I find useful in current context is admin controlled smart contracts. Here is an excerpt from whitepaper. But I find it really satisfying and secure.

"Even if a hacker gained control of the JOYSO website, without the private key of the JOYSO Admin, the smart contract would not execute. The contract would detect an
unverified admin account and the fraudulent transaction would fail.
In the event of the JOYSO Admin account private key being stolen, control can be quickly regained with multi-signature authorizations."
Pages:
Jump to: