Topic: [ANN] [JUDGE] Judge Coin | Multipool is UP @ http://judge.bemining.net/ - page 95. (Read 150097 times)
June 30, 2014, 01:00:23 PM
Yup, the dev didn't release the wallet the first week during the PoW stage, and his coin could only be mined at a select few pools that limited the hashrate at 50 Mhs per user. Minerals is the only coin that I know of that could avoid all the coins being reaped by a few big farms, which lead to its current success: good distribution and lots of smalls enthusiastic miners => lots of volume and high price on the exchanges.
June 30, 2014, 12:59:38 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge
)what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools?
If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo.
The idea is intriguing... any links to details on how it is done?
Contact the Minerals dev.
The biggest concern was the closed pool managed by the dev. If you can create a trust relationship with a big pool like Dedicated, then you can give them the source for the wallet and he can enforce the limitation. This way no-one can accuse you of any cheating. Since no-one else has the source code, no-one else can mine. The total net hash rate has to match the total hash rate of the pool. Also, if you can apply access control lists to your servers, you can limit the IPs to that of the pool, then you can make sure that no-one else can mine but the pool. You will have to rely heavily on the trust of the pool operator becuase he could of course misuse the source code but if you choose a trusted pool then you should be ok.
June 30, 2014, 12:50:35 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge
)what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools?
If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo.
The idea is intriguing... any links to details on how it is done?
check the minerals thread (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annmin-minerals-pos-developing-own-anon-solution-641057).
there was only 1 worker allowed per account and all workers limited to 50mh/s
you have to host or control all pools if you wanna do this.
i also think this is the future for a fair distribution
(sorry for my english)
I dont think controlling hash rate through pools is effective and leaves openings to cheat. What is to stop someone from making their own pool if they have large rigs?
maybe not the best solution but the only one i know so far.
solo mining was not possible.
there was no wallet released until pow was over. it was only possible to send coins from the pool to an exchange.
after pow wallet was released and pos kicked in.
i think we can say minerals is a success (100btc+ vol in b-rex and good value)!
June 30, 2014, 12:45:03 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge
)what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools?
If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo.
The idea is intriguing... any links to details on how it is done?
check the minerals thread (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annmin-minerals-pos-developing-own-anon-solution-641057).
there was only 1 worker allowed per account and all workers limited to 50mh/s
you have to host or control all pools if you wanna do this.
i also think this is the future for a fair distribution
(sorry for my english)
I dont think controlling hash rate through pools is effective and leaves openings to cheat. What is to stop someone from making their own pool if they have large rigs?
EDIT: If someone wanted to game the system they could put a pool limitation out...then setup private pools with no limitation and it would be the same as an instamine.
June 30, 2014, 12:40:55 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge
)what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools?
If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo.
The idea is intriguing... any links to details on how it is done?
check the minerals thread (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annmin-minerals-pos-developing-own-anon-solution-641057).
there was only 1 worker allowed per account and all workers limited to 50mh/s
you have to host or control all pools if you wanna do this.
i also think this is the future for a fair distribution
(sorry for my english)
June 30, 2014, 12:34:44 PM
Think again dev,
Big farms=big dumps
Big farms=big dumps
Big dump = lower price that EVERYONE has access too = fair distribution
More people have access to exchange than to big mining gear
June 30, 2014, 12:30:55 PM
Think again dev,
Big farms=big dumps
Big farms=big dumps
June 30, 2014, 12:30:35 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge
)what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools?
If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo.
The idea is intriguing... any links to details on how it is done?
June 30, 2014, 12:28:25 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge
)what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools?
I am not sure I understand how that is enforceable... How are they limiting the pools hash rate?
June 30, 2014, 12:26:44 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge
)what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools?
If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo.
June 30, 2014, 12:22:59 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge
)what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools?
June 30, 2014, 12:21:11 PM
x13 please. 
looking at the wallet just wanted to point out that judges don't use hammers only in the movies. auctioneers use hammers.
looking at the wallet just wanted to point out that judges don't use hammers only in the movies. auctioneers use hammers.
Very good point
Didnt the peoples court judge have a hammer though? June 30, 2014, 12:20:24 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
I agree. It did very well for Mineral, and is a nice way to avoid massive early dumps from big farms that are really harmful for the coin.
I don't see massive dumps as bad. There are many people who have no other way to get coins. In the end the market will drive the price whether it is mined by a farm or individuals.
June 30, 2014, 12:17:47 PM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT
June 30, 2014, 11:45:18 AM
ok this is looking good but i`m sick and tired of everyone saying that thay are honest... i say prove it, scan your passeport, give us your real name... if i ever make a coin that will be the first thing i will do... good luck
There is a point to what you are saying. Although it would be foolish to post an ID or Passport unless you want someone to start identity theft on you.
I am leaning towards posting my real name, degree, and IT certifications...
June 30, 2014, 11:37:36 AM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo ....
June 30, 2014, 09:40:24 AM
ok this is looking good but i`m sick and tired of everyone saying that thay are honest... i say prove it, scan your passeport, give us your real name... if i ever make a coin that will be the first thing i will do... good luck
June 30, 2014, 08:42:06 AM
it looks good, i will mine it
check out Minerals, they limited hashing power, although you could cheat by IP`s or something, i mined it with 4 280x cards for 5 days and now have 0.17 btc
check out Minerals, they limited hashing power, although you could cheat by IP`s or something, i mined it with 4 280x cards for 5 days and now have 0.17 btc
June 30, 2014, 08:36:30 AM
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
I agree. It did very well for Mineral, and is a nice way to avoid massive early dumps from big farms that are really harmful for the coin.
June 30, 2014, 05:14:12 AM
Jump to: