This only shows the level of you or those who hired you for FUD with the opposite outcome, - if someone unleashes trolls doesn't this means something?
This shows that the developer himself and you are the developer? Yes or no? Has lost confidence in his how product he made IF he is not willing to accept the mean of payment he himself has created. [Or the tool / machine he created to produce this product]l
Thats more than sad.
An analogy (example 1) would be if I went to the central bank to exchange an old currency such as German marks for euros and they told me: "No, Don't shift the responsibility for your decisions to someone else."
Can you imagine how ridiculous and unacceptable this sounds?
Or another example (2): I buy a product and it has a defect (here, I can't use the Karbo. With a questionable exchange like TradeOgre, BTC Trade UA or Crex24 [which is not at all acceptable for German Karbo holders because this error message pops up: "The website is unavailable in your country (Germany)."], just to name the 3 exchanges listed on coinmarketcap.com (the rest are likely to be even more dubious)
I have no guarantee at all if I am allowed to withdraw even the BTC I still get for KRB. Because of the KYC procedure.
Only for this reason I have (I admit, it's a bit borderline to ask the developer of this wonderful product named "KARBO" directly, but at the same time also a good test whether he himself still believes in his own project or not.)
If yes, he would accept KRB against BTC and if not, he reacts like you and says: "No. Don't shift the responsibility for your decisions to someone else.".
So now I'm sitting on KRB that I can't even exchange for BTC.
A total bust.
So, to continue the example ... I buy a product and find that it is not at all what I want because it has a defect. Since it even has the defect here that the purpose for which it was created, to perform a peer to peer transaction, that is between you and me, is rejected by quasi the manufacturer of the "money print machine", the KARBO project itself and the wallet or the way to mine with pools via an ASIC (which differs a little bit from the way of mining directly with the obviously from you programmed wallet), that is you yourself.
And because it (KRB) has a defect I want to change it into a realiable product (BTC).
And the producer of the machine and the whole project which is then is leading to create a product which has a defect then tells me: "No. Don't shift the responsibility for your decisions to someone else." Then I am surprised.
Example (3a)
If a producer of a 3D printing machine which is producing a product like a wing for an airplane developes a 3D printing machine which leads to the fact that the user of the 3D printing machine only gets wings for airplanes which lead to the crash of the airplane what do you think? Who has to take responsibility here?
Only the user, Only the producer of the 3D printing machine or both? Or nobody? The passengers of the airplane?
Example (3b) wich relys to Example 2:
If a seller of apples sells me an apple and I find out that this is out of plastic so I cannot eat it but the seller promised me that I could eat that apple.
Then I would like to give this apple back and tell him: "Eat this plastic apple for yourself if you are able to do that but not me. And give me a proper apple (here: BTC, which I can use to buy other cryptocurrencies)."
And if the seller (you) tells me: "Don't shift the responsibility for your decisions to someone else."
In this case, I would request a neutral independent institution such as a court and pray for evaluation of this case.
And I think that I would have a good chance of success here, because if a company sells a bad product or sells a product whose purpose is to be taken back because it is a means of payment, then it is a more than dubious company.
A product should give use and not harm to the user.
And "No!" - Neither I am spreading FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) nor I am hired for FUD.
I personally have trusted the product because I have assumed a real goal behind this project. And further developement to reach this goal. For example to list this coin on major exchanges so that there is enough liquidity. And you need liquidity if you want to exchange an asset. The more the better. And this is not happening. Also after I was asking in this forum here. And so I came to the conclusion that there is no real goal behind this project.
So, tell me, why I should spread FUD if I am interested in higher prices and more liquidity?
You can exclude that I want to buy this KARBO coin yet (cheaper than noww) after such a weak performance which is in my opinion the consequence of the weak backup by the developer / developer team.
And "hired" would assume that I would get paid for writing here? Are you really sure about what you are writing? Its an bold claim and stands for the qualilty of answer you are giving for a real problem here. (your product, the KRB, this cryptocurrency was invented to do exactly this: peer to peer transactions and you refuse to accept it? Ouch! On the one hand its legitimate to say "No. I dont want to deal with you", with no doubt, but on the other side you are signaling everyone here excactly what you are blaming me for, namely to spread FUD. Its a little more than FUD. Its a clear "No." to this coin and project. I dont know if you are aware of this fact of not.)
And I am also NOT hired you for FUD with the opposite outcome.
Question: What do you mean with "outcome"?
a)
Is a the cryptocurrency KARBO a vehicle of speculation then the wished outcome should be a rising price.
The FUD outcome should be a falling price.
And I dont see an opposite outcome of a falling price because the price IS falling all the way!
or
b)
Is the cryptocurrency KARBO a mean of payment?
The FUD outcome then should be that you cannot use it as a mean of payment.
And if you refuse to accept KRB, the developer himself (lol, sorry, but I have to laugh but its a nagging laughter), then its not only FUD.
Then it is a fact.
You are disproving at least outcome b) = KRB can be used as a mean of payment (respectively as a mean to make an OTC trade with the developer).
(Not to mention much more severe problems like fluctuating prices for salespeople. If salespeople would deny KRB then I would understand this but you?)
I want to quote your own project homepage karbo.io:
"Features: Confidential payments without intermediaries and regulators. With Karbo you are your own bank."
So .. I think a payment between you and me would be exactly this category (except that I dont want to pay but only to swap KRB vs. BTC).
But its quite similar.
I am further quoting: "Liberty is your full control [...] You can send them to anyone, anywhere in the world anytime."
I think by "anyone" you are not meant.
(besides: do you really say "anyone" or is "everyone" more suitable?)
Of course ONLY to send is only half of the story. I dont want to make a gift but an exchange.
But your claim is also superficial because I cannot send my cryptocurrency like KARBO so someone who has no wallet. e.g.
But you have both - a KRB wallet AND a BTC wallet.
But you dont have the will to accept KRB. Ouch !!! So your trust in BTC is higher than in your own project, the KARBO project. So at least I read your answer.
I could also criticise: "No intermediaries and regulators"
Thats now a handicap for me and not an advantage.
You are saying and I am quoting you: "if someone unleashes trolls doesn't this means something?"
First i want to ask you: "What does this say to you?"
An "No". I am not a troll. I just would like to convert KRB into BTC and because I dont trust exchanges I would like a peer to peer trade, an OTC trade.
And yes, in a borderline and provoking manner that I offer the developer himself this deal. (But do not assume that I chosed you because you are so realiable but you are the only public source (at least responsive) related to this KRB project which I know. So I am already quite desperated.)
But if not even the developer himself is willing to accept his own product which is what?
A mean of payment? A store of value? Whatever.
If the developer himself is not even willing to accept his own issued currency (if he has issued the coin directly or only developed the tool to create this coin does not play such a big role in my eyes - thas why I think also Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared because of this responsibility problem) then everybody should be informed who is the troll of us both.
Thanks for reading. I edited my post.
