Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [KRB] Karbo (Ҝ) Кapбoвaнeць - Anon / stable transaction costs - page 14. (Read 493174 times)

newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
A question came to my head, What kind of jambs with the stock exchange?
jr. member
Activity: 105
Merit: 2

I don't mind if Karbo someday will reach (die in your words) the price level of BTC.

Not my words! The guy i respond to.
sr. member
Activity: 499
Merit: 254
something that is certain to happen and cannot be prevented
change pow algorithm or KRB will die soon.

 
 Like asics killed BTC?

I don't mind if Karbo someday will reach (die in your words) the price level of BTC.
jr. member
Activity: 105
Merit: 2
something that is certain to happen and cannot be prevented
change pow algorithm or KRB will die soon.

 
 Like asics killed BTC?
jr. member
Activity: 105
Merit: 2
If CryptoNight Heavy is already implemented, why was it postponed?
Because of this

 
 
 Thank you! I keep saying the same thing.  Why change algo when they stop mining in secret and make available foe everyone?  A baikal n+ (40kh CN) costs half of a 1080 (2kh CN).  You are just changing the method of centralization.
sr. member
Activity: 499
Merit: 254
something that is certain to happen and cannot be prevented
change pow algorithm or KRB will die soon.

Why should KRB change POW algo? With current algo Karbo price and hash rate are growing, so KRB is growing while BTC is falling.





Karbo is the most pumped coin on livecoin exchange.

As far as I know coins are dying in a little bit different way.
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Well, I don't really see the point here. The article just describes that it is not as easy as one might have thought to keep ASISs out in the long term with just small changes to the PoW.

But does that really mean to you that it's not even worth trying it? Is it then really better to do nothing and just let everything happen, to have 80% or 90% of your coin being mined by ASICs, meaning centralisation and 51% made easy as taking candy from a baby? For me, this is not the right approach, especially as for the moment, CN-Heavy would solve the problem, you just need to flip the switch.

Yes, we all do not know what's coming in the future, yes it might be (more) difficult in the future to keep ASISs out, yes, it will require some work from devs to keep their PoW up-to-date, but for me, this would definitely be worth the work.

Quote
"He who fights can lose, but he who does not fight has already lost!" - Brecht
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
If CryptoNight Heavy is already implemented, why was it postponed?
Because of this
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
If CryptoNight Heavy is already implemented, why was it postponed?
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
anit asic or not?

Not anti asic, using Cryptonight V1

Karbo has original CryptoNight POW. CryptoNight V1 is actually Monero's modified version, which is confused and often erratiacally referred to as CryptoNight V7. It's V1, v7 is Monero hard fork number.

And no, so far no plans to change POW to implemented and postponed CryptoNight Heavy.
member
Activity: 202
Merit: 11
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
Someone is still running pool on karbowanecd, please switch to forknoted - you're getting orphaned blocks anyway.
LOL, are you kidding?
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
Some party is obstinately mining their alternative chain. All accepting Karbo please beware and make sure you are using karbo clients from official repository and are on correct chain, where's majority of pools and nodes are. Please refer to block explorer and tab Pools there.

Looks like forknote clients are affected.



Update. We think this is unmaintained private pool that is using outdated karbo deaemon and is accepting transactions from old outdated wallets with too small fees. Due to those transactions their blocks are rejected.
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
CH Heavy would be fine and you would probably have to fork less often than XMR because they only do slight changes while CN Heavy should put much more effort into ASIC development...
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
It's not present untill it's not interesting for Nicehash. Wait for pump of some of those coins.
In the mean while we are the first Bytecoin based coin to have working CryptoNight Heavy algo on testnet (the rest are Monero based).
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
No we stated that we won't rush to change algo to Monero tweak. And that we might stay asic-compatible but it is not certain. As I said, our bigger concern is Nicehash and we don't want algo same as Monero or other large coin has which is present on Nicehash. We are researching and preparing for the upcoming hardfork.

Turtlecoin, Iridium, Triton, Aeon and others have forked to use Cryptonight lite v1. Anti-ASIC and not present on Nicehash and good for small miners (CPU/GPU).

legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
No we stated that we won't rush to change algo to Monero tweak. And that we might stay asic-compatible but it is not certain. As I said, our bigger concern is Nicehash and we don't want algo same as Monero or other large coin has which is present on Nicehash. We are researching and preparing for the upcoming hardfork.
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
So I got it right that Karbo will not fork in any way to kick ASICS out, right? This makes mining this coin useless unfortunately. With 16 cards I would earn just 1.5 coins a day which are currently worth roughly 1 USD. Power cost would be more that 6 USD, makes no sense. Diff went up x10, before the profit per day was about 3 to 4 USD a day, which was not great, but ok.

Your decision if you want to put your coin in the hands of the community or a company that provides 75% of the hash rate with all the knows drawbacks.
member
Activity: 202
Merit: 11
karbo isn't go migrate to other version of cryptonight  Huh
Pages:
Jump to: