Wondering where to point your ASICs? I added these 8 currencies:
- Zetacoin ZET
- Tigercoin TGC
- AsicCoin ASC
- eMark DEM
- Unobtanium UNO
- Betacoin BET
- JouleCoin XJO
- FireFlyCoin FFC
And of course I updated the charts for the old guys: BTC, NMC, IXC, PPC, TRC, and BTE.
http://cryptometer.orgIt seems to me that some of the new coins have a problem with their progressive difficulty algorithm. They are never hitting their advertised block generation rate. Rather, they are hitting a different rate and being very consistent about it. I don't think it's a serious problem because the block generation rate is very stable through increasing and decreasing network hashrates. But it is not the predicted rate. If you look at the hourly charts, it looks like the difficulty gets into some sort of alternating loop. My first guess would be that the window of previous blocks it looks at is too small.
Zetacoin: Advertised: 30 seconds, Actual: ~22 seconds
Tigercoin: Advertised: 45 seconds, Actual: ~60 seconds
Unobtanium: Advertised: 3 minutes, Actual: ~48 seconds
FireFlyCoin: Advertised: 60 seconds, Actual: ~27 seconds
Perhaps those devs should have a look at that. Or just do some re-branding?
Also, adding these to the request list:
- LeadCoin LDC
- Quark QRK (was already there)
- Frozen FZ