Topic: [ANN] Lina.Review | Community-Driven Review Platform | TGE Event 15th Jan - page 41. (Read 23705 times)

These Helpers play a very important role in providing  reliable reviews that is why there is a need for the Helper Board of Lina Review to approve each user according to their set qualification .Even it's a bad review, it will never and can never be deleted since the platform for review is done on blockchain.

It says in the WP  that LINa Review's Helper Board will be very strict i n the approval for being a Helper due to user-oriented  assessment of the system.

And users would be saved from misleading reviews thereby getting the best products or services that they deserve with their hard earned money.

Based on my own understanding the lina review is not connected in any political reviews because the focus of this project is to give reviews of the products and services of the said company.

Yes sir/madamme that's right if the lina review successfully launch their platforms the fake reviews will be deleted and changed into honest one.

It is also a big help on us in terms of blockchain. i think lina.Review will boom because there are many cases that without reviewing like for example some cases that people are in danger in getting some things without reviewing or they go in a wrong decision because of lack on reviewing, so i gues lina.Review will helps a lot.

The lina project have a set of qualifications for them to hire an individual or consumer but i don't think that lina will hire someone with out a high set of qualifications or without reviewing their backgrounds

I am happy to be part of lina.Review and i want to know more about it on how they can help the people around the world about the review in many cases so that everyone will be aware on the things that they reviewed.

It will only be subjective of there will be no guidelines or standard for the product. As long as the review is beneficial for the viewers it will serve it purpose. Again lina.review team has a big part for this to be successful.

The lina project hired moderators you are already professionals in terms of giving reviews or feedbacks to the companies who are being reviewed,
the lina also created several ideas on how to evalute the companies' products as well as their services.

For a certain induvidual to become part of the lina project review the lina project set an requirements and criterias for you to be officially part of the lina team and the lina project accepts honest reviews and only lina team will hire helpers and moderators.

But if the entrepreneurs will make a way to return the trust of the people to their service, their business will not fall down.
A knowledgeable entrepreneur always have an idea to catch up his customers. I think the best way to return the trust of the customer is to correct what the clients saw to the service. Making also a new promos and incentives to the customer will help to gain back their enthusiasm to buy again.

if that so how are we going have our questions be answered by a reliable source?if there are no moderators and developers joining this ANN thread,a telegram group or discussion group would be a good thing.

Where did you read that? Lina review staff approval and votes from helpers? I have not read any portion on the whitepaper that states the need for staff approval. I know that applicants are pre-qualified before they become Helpers but it is not stated that Lina review staffs need to approve reviews before they are reflected in the Lina.review platform. If that will be the case, using blockchain technology will not be necessary.

Quoted from Lina whitepaper https://lina.review/lina_whitepaper.pdf
There are 2 options to become a Helper:
1. Sign up with Lina.review by attaching CV, proof of domain knowledge, personal value, etc. The applicant is only considered as a Helper after being approved by the Helper Board. Please note that in the later stages of the system, when Lina.review has grown, the approval for being a Helper will be very strict due to the user-oriented assessment of the system.
9
2 Publish lots of quality reviews, which are widely accepted (like/agree). After reaching the specific level, the reviewer will be promoted to Helper. Note that depending on the size of the system that this threshold will also increase accordingly.

On number 2 you can see that to be a Helper one can opt to publish lots of quality reviews which are widely accepted (like/agree), not necessarily vote but I guess its similar.

To be a reviewer of LINA.REVIEW "HELPER" you need to pass your CV to their team and they will review your portfolio if you are eligible to be one of the team members to make a decent review for their client's establishment or product. The team just want to have a great company and will run long for better and will give right feedback and unbiased blog for anyone.

I don't think that bad reviews from Lina users will be deleted. That's a NO-NO for reviews. When we say that the review that is posted was based on blockchain technology, there is no way (or I may say close to "no way") to delete a certain review done by anyone. According to what I have read and understood in the Whitepaper (kindly read white paper page 9 where it says "Publish lots of quality reviews, which are widely accepted (like/agree). After reaching the specific level, the reviewer will be promoted to Helper.") This is the reason why users' reviews will be evaluated by the LInA Team, if the review was "widely accepted", meaning even if it is good or bad review but if it is "reliable" and "based on facts", it will certainly be widely accepted and may be used as a basis for promotion in becoming a Helper.

Bias reviews and solicited writes of any helper will be detected by the team,
They have these so-called helpers who will do the work for them, but the team will not remain silent if they will notice some bugs and misinformation from any people they hired. The main thing here is those helpers will get money from other people just to have a good review, they can be disqualified after that, but still the harm will be done even the team delete some false review that already read by many people.

I don't know but forgive me if I have to ask this question. I hope that the moderator will somehow notice this one. I am just curious what would be the technical method of providing the Product review? On our current time, reviews online are usually written reviews or video reviews. I am wondering if LInA.Review Team will be using Technology and "Super Sophisticated" device or method that can possibly detect fraudulent/unfair/bias review given by a certain reviewer or a Helper. Everything is possible nowadays, lie-detection and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is already here and being used for many applications. This method will certainly solve our hesitations and concerns regarding reliability and credibility of the reviewers and helpers.

However great the idea is, LInA still has its flaws. They guarantee that the reviews posted on their site can't be tampered with since they are using blockchain technology. But if you think about it, most of the reviews aren't posted impromptu or done without earlier planning or preparation. The Reviewers or Helpers prepare a review then will post it at a later time. I just hope and urge LINA team to somehow empower their Reviewers and Helpers to prevent them from posting an unfair and bias reviews. A great compensation I think will be a good start, besides most of the advertisers, business owners and the like pay more to the most "CREDIBLE" and "RELIABLE" Product Reviews and Rating companies. 

I would like to state the fact that Lina.review is not only a review platform but a community platform full of opportunities were merchants, users and helpers alike may promote, send their feedback and earn by doing so. Integrity is always important and with everyone participating in Lina.review success is inevitable. People may not see the program presented by Lina.review but I do believe that people will appreciate Lina.review once it is Launch and used by consumers, helpers and merchants. For those who are asking on how accurate the reviews are, what if the review is manipulated or paid, I would say that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. If you know that as helpers you are being paid, regardless whether your review is positive or a negative one, would you still risk loosing your position as a helper? If you are looking forward for more projects under Lina.review I think you will think twice. The qualified reviews I think will be the Helpers review. Remember, helpers will need to submit their resume/CV for review to qualify as helpers. Your true Identity will be revealed and Smart contracts will be signed. Once you do an act that violates the smart contract, you may be suspended or worse removed as a Helper. Lina.review is such a great project and vision. I do hope that people behind Lina.review will be more competent and serious in addressing concern from us users as well as for those who will Invest in the project. Good luck to us.