Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Lina.Review | Community-Driven Review Platform | TGE Event 15th Jan - page 58. (Read 23690 times)

newbie
Activity: 198
Merit: 0
A single negative review can damage the company's prestige and profitability. So how could Lina.Review can tell if a certain review is not bias?

I guess these reviews can only be posted by helpers, and these helpers undergo qualifications before they can be appointed being a helper, so let us call that filtering process, and saying negative review as long as they have proof about it will never be biased and will help customers a lot and at the same time making the product owner to enhance their service and make more quality products.

So it means reviews written by common users to a certain business company are being filtered and approved first before it appears on their profile?
And after the filtering what are they going to do with the negative ones, hide or dispose?
newbie
Activity: 198
Merit: 0
Can i ask for clarification? Will a reliable (negative) review given by a Helper be allowed by Lina Review to be posted?  Is that what they meant for transparency?
That is a big HuhHuh? I supposed they have to. If only the positive reviews they will let out then it will look mysterious and questionable, on the other hand, companies/products who will pay for a review will not be happy if they see negative review posted on them and to think they paid Lina for the said review
newbie
Activity: 157
Merit: 0
The total number of LINA token created will be 900,000,000. 33.33% of all LINA tokens (300,000,000) will be available for sale to the public in the LINA Token Generation Event.66.67% of all LINA tokens (600,000,000) will be locked in Smart Contract to be released annually over 10 years (60,000,000 Token per year).

    Correct me if I'm wrong with my understanding to this one guys, 300M token is the allocation budget to all bounty campaigns of the project, right? then 600M token will be locked in Smart contract. Why you need to lock this 600M token of lina? also how about if the 300M token allocation for the bounties will not be sold out? what will happen for the unsold token is it automatically be burn?
Hey. The 300M is not bounty allocations it is for public sale. I think i read somewhere in their white paper that the unsold tokens wil burn i’m not sure though.
newbie
Activity: 130
Merit: 0
I am wondering if the reviews found in the playstore and apple store on applications also reliable or just bought reviews too because there are very new applications in which other people have not yet known but when you look at the ratings, the ratings are also 5 stars.
No doubt those reviews are also paid reviews. I also happened to encounter those but i didnt know there is a review platform like Lina. Anyway people who do know yet about the procedure will eventually look at the ratings and reviews first before buying the product ot the services.

IF these are the looks we are looking forward, then there's no more chance for them,
you are telling that reviews can be paid and all reviewers can be a paid review, then where will LINA go?
we don't know yet the capability! can't we discuss more and prevent this? let them adjust. change your Qs guys!
Lol! Salute dude! Maybe you are right. But where is the dev cant even hear anything from him. Maybe it will be best if we can hear some solid explanations from him so it will erase all the doubts of people.
newbie
Activity: 198
Merit: 0
The reviews of the consumers play a significant role in the success of Lina Review.  It says here that the reviews will be coming from the Helpers wHich is also known as Experts.  You will not be called an Expert for no valid reasons.  Therefore, the users upon checking reviews of the products or services will be rest assured that reviews given are qualified and reliable.
Don’t forget that those reviewers which they call helpers are hired and paid. There is no more reliable review than a review from a former costumer who used the product personally and not just the opinion of those people we do not know from where they came from and what motive they have.
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 258
Another paid shills to make favorable reviews?
Sounds like  Grin Cheesy Wink. Let’s give them a chance maybe they will make it in a more creative and reliable ways.

I hope this is not about the payment, every review is a good way to tell the company or whatsoever a good or bad one.
Payment is not a good sign to run an honest and transparent review to anyone! a shill is just trash that needs to stop!
We are creating a community and a review is a big factor! Never lie or make one under money. TRANSPARENCY PLEASE!
We all know that they are not the only review platform in existence or going to exist i dont know i didnt see their roadmap yet but i only wish they are going to make a difference from those existing paid review platform because if not, reviews will not be as effective anymore as it should be in the future. The credibility of the reviews will be stained just because everybody knows that positive reviews can be bought and negative ones can be paid to be removed.
As we all know, the reviews and reviewers are often localized base on the whitepaper of Lina's have, making it difficult for users to search and compare the reviews among communities. The solution to this problem is to build Lina.review where the platform for reviewing on
Blockchain, utilizing blockchain’s immutability to produce the best possible transparency and create conditions for reviewers to benefit from providing quality reviews, as well as easily and directly interact with users and providers of products or services that are currently trustless. Lina tokens shall be the native token of the system, with the purpose of tokenizing the review industry. Therefore, in this matter we should hold on to what Lina can give to anyone who will use their platform.
newbie
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
I do believe that Lina Review will succeed. Why? because the life of the said project is on reviews perse. And those reviews are being screened, that only credible and reliable reviews will be posted whether it will be a positive or negative review. This will benefit the consumers in deciding to chose which products or services will serve them best according to their needs.
sr. member
Activity: 777
Merit: 251
What is the overview of the Lina Platform anyway? can anyone specify it to me one by one, because this is something gives me a lot of question in my mind, which is also gave me a bit doubt about it. But if you can answer it well, I may able to participate to become one of the  users and investors of Lina. Thank you Wink
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 11
The total number of LINA token created will be 900,000,000. 33.33% of all LINA tokens (300,000,000) will be available for sale to the public in the LINA Token Generation Event.66.67% of all LINA tokens (600,000,000) will be locked in Smart Contract to be released annually over 10 years (60,000,000 Token per year).

    Correct me if I'm wrong with my understanding to this one guys, 300M token is the allocation budget to all bounty campaigns of the project, right? then 600M token will be locked in Smart contract. Why you need to lock this 600M token of lina? also how about if the 300M token allocation for the bounties will not be sold out? what will happen for the unsold token is it automatically be burn?
Obviously speaking, the 600M tokens will lock for the future used. It was stated in the whitepaper:
66.67% of LINA created during the Token Generation Event (600,000,000 Token) will be
locked in Smart Contract to be released annually over 10 years (60,000,000 Token per year).
The released Token will be distributed as follow:
 15% to the Lina Foundation to keep the Lina Platform running.
 15% will be reserved for future stakeholders.
 35% to the Helpers.
 35% to Large Token Holders (those in possession of > 1 million tokens)
Released time: January 15th each year, start from 2019 to 2029.

The dev does not discuss what they will do to the excess token but I think it is like other ICO where the unsold tokens are burned.

Telegram is not available for lina and I guess it is important that the dev is updating the thread. He must answer a typical question like this.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
Online review is also a way of advertising a certain company to use "word of mouth". Good online reviews bring in new customer. We as a consumer, we want to look first for the reviews or feedback before we spend our money. By Lina's platform, this could help consumers to give us the most legitimate and trustworthy online reviews.
but how they can assure us that those online reviews are worth it? transparent and no back jobs?
Can reviews be funded right? as you are here on the forum and do such campaigns. how can you make sure that those people are ot making reviews to earn money?
In the first  place, if you fully understood what's indicated in the whitepaper you can find it there the strength of Lina compare to current system.
Then aside from that, For Lina.review and LINA token systems, revenue from advertising is very important, as it generates three values according to their whitepaper which I read it.


hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 453
I am wondering if the reviews found in the playstore and apple store on applications also reliable or just bought reviews too because there are very new applications in which other people have not yet known but when you look at the ratings, the ratings are also 5 stars.
No doubt those reviews are also paid reviews. I also happened to encounter those but i didnt know there is a review platform like Lina. Anyway people who do know yet about the procedure will eventually look at the ratings and reviews first before buying the product ot the services.

IF these are the looks we are looking forward, then there's no more chance for them,
you are telling that reviews can be paid and all reviewers can be a paid review, then where will LINA go?
we don't know yet the capability! can't we discuss more and prevent this? let them adjust. change your Qs guys!
newbie
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
Can i ask for clarification? Will a reliable (negative) review given by a Helper be allowed by Lina Review to be posted?  Is that what they meant for transparency?
member
Activity: 179
Merit: 10
Users and Helpers can earn Lina token basing on their contribution.

 As the statement said in the above, it is one of the strength of lina.review according to the whitepaper that I read compared to other current system. Now my question is how can Users and Helpers can able to earn the lina token? is it according to their contribution or they need to invest on lina token? Then once they invest, is it automatic that their task is to wait as users and Helpers for their profit. Thanks for any assistance for this question of mine.
member
Activity: 560
Merit: 13
The reviews of the consumers play a significant role in the success of Lina Review.  It says here that the reviews will be coming from the Helpers wHich is also known as Experts.  You will not be called an Expert for no valid reasons.  Therefore, the users upon checking reviews of the products or services will be rest assured that reviews given are qualified and reliable.
Expertise in a work gives us an assurance that the helpers of lina are qualified and veteran when it comes in reviewing a project. An expert helper can publish a good and accurate review which will help the lina more reliable and fair to all people. If the lina will successfully launch this project with a qualified helper then it is nice to make this review as a referral or basis when we will buy something.
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
The reviews of the consumers play a significant role in the success of Lina Review.  It says here that the reviews will be coming from the Helpers wHich is also known as Experts.  You will not be called an Expert for no valid reasons.  Therefore, the users upon checking reviews of the products or services will be rest assured that reviews given are qualified and reliable.
member
Activity: 805
Merit: 26
Cool project, good luck dev!
lemme see how is the ground make things good and nice on this?
i am now judging you, dude! but what is your foundation of saying this project is cool and good?
have you read the white paper? if not how did you get into that? have you read all the comments here? this thing is full of doubt! i am telling you!
Quite ironic isn't it?
You are promoting the project by wearing the signature of lina but look at what you are saying in the project. It seems like you did not read the whitepaper, you just join in a project that is not totally convincing to you.
If you have doubt in the project, why you are still promoting it?
full member
Activity: 902
Merit: 112
The problem with advertisers is they dont accept negative reviews to be published. If they indeed pay Lina for reviews, they will want to make sure their payment will not be in vain. Meaning reviews must be something that will uplift or support their product or advertisement.
This is how I imagine with the lina, helpers will make a neutral review for a certain product or service then the common users are the one who will give their sides about the review. If it good point, it will uplift the company but if it is in bad review, it will damage the company. It is now in the responsibility of the firms to handle the review. If they will make some changes about their services.

Yes thats right, in addition to what you just said It is the responsibility of the Helper to monthly submit a certain number of reviews with an
acceptable quality. In case where the Helper fails to satisfy these conditions in two consecutive months, they will be demoted down to common user.

newbie
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
I like how your MVP works, will look deeply Smiley
full member
Activity: 258
Merit: 101
New Era of Freelancing
A single negative review can damage the company's prestige and profitability. So how could Lina.Review can tell if a certain review is not bias?

I guess these reviews can only be posted by helpers, and these helpers undergo qualifications before they can be appointed being a helper, so let us call that filtering process, and saying negative review as long as they have proof about it will never be biased and will help customers a lot and at the same time making the product owner to enhance their service and make more quality products.

So it means reviews written by common users to a certain business company are being filtered and approved first before it appears on their profile?
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Great help for the community, i think providing profits for users and experts for the system development and quality of reviews they made will become competitive and more legitimate because they cannot be easily influence or attract from the offers coming from other companies since they are paid already.


I believe Revain are in the same category and they are doing really well with development and overall progress! Compared to revain progress and their price 3$, having a starting price of 1$ is really high
Pages:
Jump to: