here´s my address: FN21sHvb76JMPNB8VLsUQ62tbocmwkGxFW alternate you can send to the address on block crawlers page : FHt6NQ57seYkRMFDp75w27UNU4m42Wh4SR 
Topic: ANN Mandatory update FLAP FINAL Miners to share BILLIONS of Coins 10 days !SWAP! - page 28. (Read 40609 times)
August 06, 2017, 01:54:50 PM
i Did the explorer here´s my address: FN21sHvb76JMPNB8VLsUQ62tbocmwkGxFW alternate you can send to the address on block crawlers page : FHt6NQ57seYkRMFDp75w27UNU4m42Wh4SR
here´s my address: FN21sHvb76JMPNB8VLsUQ62tbocmwkGxFW alternate you can send to the address on block crawlers page : FHt6NQ57seYkRMFDp75w27UNU4m42Wh4SR 
August 06, 2017, 01:51:55 PM
everyone get your claim and your address up on the forum
example
I did the explorer here is my address
kjabdjajhdjhdnwjndnwjdnjonwdndjnnadsonaokm
example
I did the explorer here is my address
kjabdjajhdjhdnwjndnwjdnjonwdndjnnadsonaokm
August 06, 2017, 12:47:49 PM
morning all
FRkUMUkLnfxcKGAKkoakexSJ8383kxi53p 9600 0 100% 4.19 MH
FGmc1isgp6dZaAC6C3upMPsd4DHecpzGx4 13568 128 99.06% 5.93 MH
FFQqUWPptNqsUwNZwbX9q48YwDays8ij62 2432 0 100% 1.06 MH
FTP9wvRGAtipARdZkPRuHGvh1JwQrPeFvp 1654 0 100% 722.83 KH
FPgUwTD1c9WQ91CSQUfposuAbAaRMo3GYq 5760 128 97.82% 2.52 MH
todays winners ill check again in 5 to make sure i got everyone
FRkUMUkLnfxcKGAKkoakexSJ8383kxi53p 9600 0 100% 4.19 MH
FGmc1isgp6dZaAC6C3upMPsd4DHecpzGx4 13568 128 99.06% 5.93 MH
FFQqUWPptNqsUwNZwbX9q48YwDays8ij62 2432 0 100% 1.06 MH
FTP9wvRGAtipARdZkPRuHGvh1JwQrPeFvp 1654 0 100% 722.83 KH
FPgUwTD1c9WQ91CSQUfposuAbAaRMo3GYq 5760 128 97.82% 2.52 MH
todays winners ill check again in 5 to make sure i got everyone
August 06, 2017, 12:03:18 AM
789555 + = 12500 * COIN; << WE ARE HERE
Block Count:
793628
Difficulty:
0.45978503
Connections:
19 Flappers
Network mH/s:
45.94
we should be at 12500 coins can anyone verify?
Block Count:
793628
Difficulty:
0.45978503
Connections:
19 Flappers
Network mH/s:
45.94
we should be at 12500 coins can anyone verify?
August 06, 2017, 12:00:42 AM
means:
200000-299999 50 K Blocks
300000-699999 25 K Blocks
700000-724999 12.5 K Blocks
725000-749999 6.25 K Blocks
750000-779332 25 K Blocks
779333-789554 12.5 K Blocks
789555-822221 50 K Blocks << we are here
822222-833332 12.5 K Blocks
833333-888887 100 K Blocks
888888-900000 12.5 K Blocks
900001- ? 50 Coins per Block or POS ?
your doing it just like the rest of us but there reward blocking is off. we are all now getting 50000 per block
works as designed, only the first page table on the topic is wrong
so im packing to move so ive been in and out ... is the table wrong whats the payout at the moment ?
August 05, 2017, 11:58:37 PM
anyone mining tomorrow when i wake up will get an extra payout when i wake .. also lets get these bounties paid of today i know i owe for a wallet and explore .. and one dude who has a claim to 400million flappy from the cryptsy wallet .. not we have an explorer i can go thew some of the transactions that he provided ... any one else who i owe coins to let try and get everyone squared away
August 05, 2017, 08:04:07 PM
From main,cpp:
means:
200000-299999 50 K Blocks
300000-699999 25 K Blocks
700000-724999 12.5 K Blocks
725000-749999 6.25 K Blocks
750000-779332 25 K Blocks
779333-789554 12.5 K Blocks
789555-822221 50 K Blocks << we are here
822222-833332 12.5 K Blocks
833333-888887 100 K Blocks
888888-900000 12.5 K Blocks
900001- ? 50 Coins per Block or POS ?
something is wrong !!!
-When I should receive a reward of 6250FLAPS per block, I only received 50flaps!!
-When I should receive a reward of 25000FLAPS per block, I only received 12500flaps
- NOW that I should only receive 12500FLAPS per mined block I get more ...
Anyway, what's going on?
Code:
else if(nHeight < 200000) { nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 300000) { nSubsidy = 50000 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 700000) { nSubsidy = 25000 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 725000) { nSubsidy = 12500 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 750000) { nSubsidy = 6250 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 779333) { nSubsidy = 25000 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 789555) { nSubsidy = 12500 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 822222) { nSubsidy = 50000 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 833333) { nSubsidy = 12500 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 888888) { nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN; }
else if(nHeight < 900001) { nSubsidy = 12500 * COIN; }
200000-299999 50 K Blocks
300000-699999 25 K Blocks
700000-724999 12.5 K Blocks
725000-749999 6.25 K Blocks
750000-779332 25 K Blocks
779333-789554 12.5 K Blocks
789555-822221 50 K Blocks << we are here
822222-833332 12.5 K Blocks
833333-888887 100 K Blocks
888888-900000 12.5 K Blocks
900001- ? 50 Coins per Block or POS ?
something is wrong !!!
-When I should receive a reward of 6250FLAPS per block, I only received 50flaps!!
-When I should receive a reward of 25000FLAPS per block, I only received 12500flaps
- NOW that I should only receive 12500FLAPS per mined block I get more ...
Anyway, what's going on?
your doing it just like the rest of us but there reward blocking is off. we are all now getting 50000 per block
August 05, 2017, 06:56:32 PM
what is your protocol version? sounds like you are on the sp1 chain
August 05, 2017, 06:05:12 PM
something is wrong !!!
-When I should receive a reward of 6250FLAPS per block, I only received 50flaps!!
-When I should receive a reward of 25000FLAPS per block, I only received 12500flaps
- NOW that I should only receive 12500FLAPS per mined block I get more ...
Anyway, what's going on?
August 05, 2017, 12:17:38 PM
i am doing a rescan now with blockcrawler, expect it to be online soon again.
rescan ready, we are on block 792864 as of 6 PM 49 CET
awesome! on a side note, the futurebit moonlander 1 is now mining flap! lol
August 05, 2017, 11:49:57 AM
i am doing a rescan now with blockcrawler, expect it to be online soon again.
rescan ready, we are on block 792864 as of 6 PM 49 CET
August 05, 2017, 11:25:58 AM
i am doing a rescan now with blockcrawler, expect it to be online soon again.
August 05, 2017, 11:16:31 AM
mrr implies stratum+tcp// so I did not mess that up. lol The pool profile is what got me. Mining off wallet with the zeus now since everything is offline today
August 05, 2017, 10:53:44 AM
[but i have a bad feeling the chain may have been forked.
so everony please compare to blockcrawler an post result pls.]
My local wallet matches exactly, with 4 connected notes, diff is low , but the chain is still running late from before...
--
The A2 will happily beat the hell out of a pool if you forget the stratum+ , don't do that lol
I have also found MRR masks certain error conditions sometimes, I suppose it is because it is taking the stratum info apart and putting it back together again, so some things that should be 'wrong' get fixed up, and nobody realizes the data is gibberish except the poor pool...
Chuckle that made my day on the explorer:
Connections:
15 Flappers
so everony please compare to blockcrawler an post result pls.]
My local wallet matches exactly, with 4 connected notes, diff is low , but the chain is still running late from before...
--
The A2 will happily beat the hell out of a pool if you forget the stratum+ , don't do that lol
I have also found MRR masks certain error conditions sometimes, I suppose it is because it is taking the stratum info apart and putting it back together again, so some things that should be 'wrong' get fixed up, and nobody realizes the data is gibberish except the poor pool...
Chuckle that made my day on the explorer:
Connections:
15 Flappers
August 05, 2017, 10:29:26 AM
it runs cgminer 3.9.0 innosilicon-12chip-v0p5. I had it set without the stratum+tcp I think, just the url.
August 05, 2017, 10:22:20 AM
1 of the times it was me. My A2 had your pool as its third pool on mrr. Just so happened the first 2 failed and it rolled to yours. It was on there a while before I got notified of the lack of hash on prohashing. =(
I deleted the pool from the list lol.
out of interest what miner do you use ?
it spammed heavy, guess you where coming from stratum+tcp port
miner was send 1000 ´s of 0 diff shares. no matter what pool told you to send.
i have seen that with sgminer on stratum+tcp p2pool also,
had a chat yesterday with waillor, and he was sending fine on stratum+tcp with bfgminer.
August 05, 2017, 10:10:12 AM
not sure, why, but we got one miner that is practically an overkill to the network hasrate.
it does not make sense to push a network with 78 mh or more when the nethash is like 22 mh like it was yesterday.
this reduces the pools to one. Practically. not a smart move, who ever is running that miner.
and even more it will reduce the miners to one.
greedy or just dumb i don t know, but this is the wrong way to push a network. if you want to push a network NEVER take more then 50 % of the network´s hashrate. have fun mining this, i am pretty sure many will hop off bcause of you.
it does not make sense to push a network with 78 mh or more when the nethash is like 22 mh like it was yesterday.
this reduces the pools to one. Practically. not a smart move, who ever is running that miner.
and even more it will reduce the miners to one.
greedy or just dumb i don t know, but this is the wrong way to push a network. if you want to push a network NEVER take more then 50 % of the network´s hashrate. have fun mining this, i am pretty sure many will hop off bcause of you.
1 of the times it was me. My A2 had your pool as its third pool on mrr. Just so happened the first 2 failed and it rolled to yours. It was on there a while before I got notified of the lack of hash on prohashing. =(
I deleted the pool from the list lol.
August 05, 2017, 10:01:19 AM
i was hoping it was caused by a mistake , so -- all good, anyway - but i have a bad feeling the chain may have been forked.
so everony please compare to blockcrawler an post result pls.
for merged mining:
it is a feature of p2pool, i didnt implement it, just activated it.
higher hashrate:
higher hashrate is welcome, but yeah 70mh compared to 30 something is a bit high
if you really like to push it, add 10 mh, that is still a lot, - better would be many miners with small hashrates to have much more nodes.
Also: if anyone is interested, here ´s the p2pool node that connects to the current p2pool network.
http://blockcrawler.rf.gd/download/
so everony please compare to blockcrawler an post result pls.
for merged mining:
it is a feature of p2pool, i didnt implement it, just activated it.
higher hashrate:
higher hashrate is welcome, but yeah 70mh compared to 30 something is a bit high
if you really like to push it, add 10 mh, that is still a lot, - better would be many miners with small hashrates to have much more nodes.
Also: if anyone is interested, here ´s the p2pool node that connects to the current p2pool network.
http://blockcrawler.rf.gd/download/
August 05, 2017, 09:27:54 AM
[not sure, why, but we got one miner that is practically an overkill to the network hasrate].
Oops...
Because I was not paying attention for a few days and 2 other coins on the miner failed over, should have been only hitting it with around 15-20 at most, I will let the diff go back down, sorry folks.
[this reduces the pools to one.]
From a practical point however, when someone can solomine at a higher hashrate than all the pools combined, the coin is very vulnerable to being manipulated, flappy really does need a bit more hashrate, the only thing that prevents anyone from messing with it at the moment is that it isn't tradable for anything, . That will change when it gets listed on an exchange...
You do realize that if you implement merge mining, the difficulty of flappy will most likely be driven up to the difficulty of the child coin....
Long ago, myriad did a pool with merge mining of multiple coins, they handled the multiple wallet address issue by having the miners sign the aux addresses using their primary wallet, and then submitting the signed text to the pool, which then saved those addresses and associated them with the primary mining address, this allowed half a dozen aux coins to be included without making a gigantic mess out of the miner username field...
Oops...
Because I was not paying attention for a few days and 2 other coins on the miner failed over, should have been only hitting it with around 15-20 at most, I will let the diff go back down, sorry folks.
[this reduces the pools to one.]
From a practical point however, when someone can solomine at a higher hashrate than all the pools combined, the coin is very vulnerable to being manipulated, flappy really does need a bit more hashrate, the only thing that prevents anyone from messing with it at the moment is that it isn't tradable for anything, . That will change when it gets listed on an exchange...
You do realize that if you implement merge mining, the difficulty of flappy will most likely be driven up to the difficulty of the child coin....
Long ago, myriad did a pool with merge mining of multiple coins, they handled the multiple wallet address issue by having the miners sign the aux addresses using their primary wallet, and then submitting the signed text to the pool, which then saved those addresses and associated them with the primary mining address, this allowed half a dozen aux coins to be included without making a gigantic mess out of the miner username field...
August 05, 2017, 04:34:18 AM
not sure, why, but we got one miner that is practically an overkill to the network hasrate.
it does not make sense to push a network with 78 mh or more when the nethash is like 22 mh like it was yesterday.
this reduces the pools to one. Practically. not a smart move, who ever is running that miner.
and even more it will reduce the miners to one.
greedy or just dumb i don t know, but this is the wrong way to push a network. if you want to push a network NEVER take more then 50 % of the network´s hashrate. have fun mining this, i am pretty sure many will hop off bcause of you.
it does not make sense to push a network with 78 mh or more when the nethash is like 22 mh like it was yesterday.
this reduces the pools to one. Practically. not a smart move, who ever is running that miner.
and even more it will reduce the miners to one.
greedy or just dumb i don t know, but this is the wrong way to push a network. if you want to push a network NEVER take more then 50 % of the network´s hashrate. have fun mining this, i am pretty sure many will hop off bcause of you.
Jump to: