Megacoin and Anoncoin can't provide these...check AnonyMint's posts.
If you're reading and belive in what the deluded person with only basic understandings of economics is writing, you're deluded and ignorant yourself.
+1 for him mostly talking to himself in his own thread.
Next up:
Anoncoin isn't anonymous. Who said that zerocoin is not sufficient by itself for total privacy?
Has anyone used a working zerocoin protocol in a coin to test this assumption? No.
It's all in theory.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3009655I am invalidating some of what I wrote in that post, there is
a case where we need a laundry and don't want to use paypal or a credit card, i.e. we want to reveal our identity but not overtly to our bank (or the merchant can't accept paypal) yet we want to delink that back to our public key for our coin.
Anoncoin (over I2P not Tor) is anonymous against most privacy adversaries but potentially not against the traffic analysis (data mining) capabilities of an NSA adversary, since I2P isn't yet HIGH-latency enabled (to defeat timing analysis). Tor may already be a data mining operation of the NSA, because it only does 3 hops and the servers are not all the clients (thus handling a lot of traffic and have to be funded somehow, who do you think is funding the Tor servers? It only takes 1 or 2 or 3 in your onion route to give you away, especially when coupled with traffic timing analysis).
We need to be careful about summarizing at this point, because many issues are still being debated.
About my economics understanding, Moldbug is correct there can only be one cypto-currency remaining at the end, and the reason is the
nature of unit-of-account versus store-of-value (specifically see linked point #2), i.e. only the
majority will choose. Perhaps there could be others that exist not as the unit-of-account, e.g. ones that are more anonymous but shunned by the majority because they are, yet they will be outcasts/fringe.
Guys I need to stay focused on technical analysis (in technical threads) so I may not be able to follow the discussion here.
His reply is pointless.
Those 3 points.. I haven't done a single one of those. Modified ubuntu machine for bitcoin only, behind a vpn and additonal 2 proxies at the moment.
Those servers are linked back to your IP address, because the NSA can see all the traffic. Encrypting what is inside your packet doesn't always help, because of timing analysis. Also they can compel by court order the VPNs to turn over logs.
There is an awful lot of conjecture and paranoia here. When you say "Moldbug is correct there can only be one cypto-currency remaining at the end", it tells me you don't understand economics at all. It's like saying only gold, or diamonds are valuable, or there is only going to be one stock remaining in the NYSE! The reason Litecoin was developed is because people wanted alternatives to Bitcoin. It's just a matter of time until various governments propose their own digital currencies. Anyone who thinks everyone will settle on a single "World Currency" is living in a dream world. If they did, it would be the biggest reason not to use it, and to seek alternatives. When we talk about privacy and anonymity it's all relative, just like buying a gun safe. Not everyone needs a $12,000 Fort Knox safe. Alternatives will offer various levels of rarity, security, privacy, and features that determine their popularity and value. I believe these alternatives are already playing a part in pegging the value of Bitcoin and Litecoin.