Topic: [ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC] - page 39. (Read 281382 times)
December 23, 2013, 03:27:28 PM
please, an mmc blockexplorer?
December 23, 2013, 02:43:54 PM
the mining with only one CPU is more or less a lottery
It really is unless your hpm allows you to solve a block within a block time which is impossible for the default miner on any hardware imaginable. As far as I understand when the block is solved and the difficulty increases your miner has to start over. So if the block time is 5-10 minutes and the hashrate is 3 hpm, you have only about 15-30 attempts (out of thousands possible hash values) to solve the block.
As for me, I managed to find one block about a week ago on my 0.7 hpm PC. I suppose it was due to some difficulty glitch before it was fixed and will hardly happen again.
December 23, 2013, 02:11:24 PM
With core i7-2600K:
...
"blocks" : 1970,
"difficulty" : 0.00000506,
"genproclimit" : 8,
"hashespermin" : 3.07245075,
...
According to the profitability calculator it is a block every 5 days.
I guess without a pool, at the current difficulty, the mining with only one CPU is more or less a lottery, not a mining (unless you have cluster of at least several dozen of PC's).
...
"blocks" : 1970,
"difficulty" : 0.00000506,
"genproclimit" : 8,
"hashespermin" : 3.07245075,
...
According to the profitability calculator it is a block every 5 days.
I guess without a pool, at the current difficulty, the mining with only one CPU is more or less a lottery, not a mining (unless you have cluster of at least several dozen of PC's).
December 23, 2013, 02:03:20 PM
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
See www.MemoryCoin.info -> Mining -> Linux Miner crashes?
December 23, 2013, 12:40:20 PM
Ordered two server 2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00GHz. The first shows 10.1 hpm, second only 8.1 hpm. I began to investigate the problem and realized that the first server memory with frequency 1600 MHz, and in the second 1333 MHz.
ps. Replaced the memory to 1600 and still 8.1 hpm, I understand what it is.
pps.
It turned out, the host for these two servers used different processors:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
ps. Replaced the memory to 1600 and still 8.1 hpm, I understand what it is.
pps.
It turned out, the host for these two servers used different processors:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
December 23, 2013, 12:05:07 PM
This coin is an odd one.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never hit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never hit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
what cpu are you using in the 1hpm computer?
First generation i5 procs 1.63hpm.
December 23, 2013, 11:17:14 AM
This coin is an odd one.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never hit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never hit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
what cpu are you using in the 1hpm computer?
December 23, 2013, 10:21:46 AM
i wish a pool appears before the christmas 
Better put it in your letter to Santa!
December 23, 2013, 10:12:58 AM
i wish a pool appears before the christmas
December 23, 2013, 09:42:51 AM
Mail notification about the crash memorycoind.
Replace the data on your mail server.
Code:
sudo su -
apt-get install nano
apt-get install ssmtp
apt-get install mailutils
cd /etc/ssmtp
nano revaliases
--
root:[email protected]:smtp.yandex.ru:25
--
nano ssmtp.conf
--
mailhub=smtp.yandex.ru
[email protected]
authpass=PASS
FromLineOverride=YES
--
test:
echo "down" | mail -s "test down" [email protected]
nano /etc/crontab
--
*/5 * * * * root /bin/ps -ef|grep -v grep|grep memorycoind >/dev/null || echo "down" | mail -s "ferm-01 down" [email protected]
--
apt-get install nano
apt-get install ssmtp
apt-get install mailutils
cd /etc/ssmtp
nano revaliases
--
root:[email protected]:smtp.yandex.ru:25
--
nano ssmtp.conf
--
mailhub=smtp.yandex.ru
[email protected]
authpass=PASS
FromLineOverride=YES
--
test:
echo "down" | mail -s "test down" [email protected]
nano /etc/crontab
--
*/5 * * * * root /bin/ps -ef|grep -v grep|grep memorycoind >/dev/null || echo "down" | mail -s "ferm-01 down" [email protected]
--
Replace the data on your mail server.
December 23, 2013, 08:47:39 AM
This coin is an odd one.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never fit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacyI had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never fit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
BTW, anybody tried replacing the unholy mess of OpenSSL with cryptopp?
December 23, 2013, 08:41:44 AM
This coin is an odd one.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never fit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never fit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
+like
December 23, 2013, 08:38:03 AM
This coin is an odd one.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never hit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
I had a range of computers from 6hpm to 1hpm and the 6hpm never hit a block. Meanwhile 1 of my 1hpm hit 2 blocks in a row.
I'm at 1945 MMC and yes I'm mining on the right version/fork/etc; damn linux version is a crasholohic.
December 23, 2013, 08:28:34 AM
I want to memorycoind make dumpprivkey and need the address wallet. How do I know my address wallet?
memorycoind listreceivedbyaddress 1 true
December 23, 2013, 08:23:41 AM
anyone have a profitability calculator?
will you go broke cloud mining this?
will you go broke cloud mining this?
here is one.
http://bitcoind.url.ph/memorycoin2_calc.html
December 23, 2013, 08:21:26 AM
anyone have a profitability calculator?
will you go broke cloud mining this?
will you go broke cloud mining this?
December 23, 2013, 08:17:33 AM
I want to memorycoind make dumpprivkey and need the address wallet. How do I know my address wallet?
December 23, 2013, 07:49:16 AM
Difficulty is dropping slowly, maybe i'll finally be able to find my first block (5 days @ 1.63hpm 
)
) December 23, 2013, 03:37:32 AM
reward decreased to 266 MMC per block 
yep and it sucks...... 
December 23, 2013, 12:27:17 AM
reward decreased to 266 MMC per block
Around 13 weeks until block reward is halved -- 140 MMC Block Reward. (week of March 23rd, 2014)
Around 27 weeks until block reward is fourthed -- 70 MMC Block Reward (Week of June 22nd, 2014)
These blocks are such a steal for a reward every 6 minutes and are extremely decent for steady circulation.
I could expect difficulty to go up with a pool and a decrease in cloud mining as difficulty increases and block reward goes down.
Jump to: