Block 229, here we go again
Topic: [ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC] - page 92. (Read 281389 times)
December 16, 2013, 09:29:56 AM
December 16, 2013, 09:29:01 AM
Many hours, Not even .0000000001... Losing faith on this coin.
Anyone thinking about making a pool?
Anyone thinking about making a pool?
It needs a stand alone miner before you can have a pool. I'm sure there's one in the works.
K.
December 16, 2013, 09:25:32 AM
Many hours, Not even .0000000001... Losing faith on this coin.
Anyone thinking about making a pool?
Anyone thinking about making a pool?
December 16, 2013, 09:09:32 AM
I'm hanging on, I rather enjoy the variability, and am looking forward to seeing the rewards ramp up.
I wonder if other MemoryCoiners can help me decide - I have some older AMD CPUs standing idle and was wondering which CPU based coin would be worth mining. These are Phenom X6 processors, so don't have AES or SSE which rules out the latest releases (MMC, Quark, Molecule, Protoshares). Is there anything worthwhile?
I wonder if other MemoryCoiners can help me decide - I have some older AMD CPUs standing idle and was wondering which CPU based coin would be worth mining. These are Phenom X6 processors, so don't have AES or SSE which rules out the latest releases (MMC, Quark, Molecule, Protoshares). Is there anything worthwhile?
Yacoin is the only one I can think of right now, It's scrypt-jane, so I think it should work.
K.
December 16, 2013, 09:08:57 AM
http://i39.tinypic.com/j92fit.png
From yesterday:
No one mines a block.
But when i do, it gets orphaned.
Seriously?
From yesterday:
No one mines a block.
But when i do, it gets orphaned.
Seriously?
December 16, 2013, 09:08:46 AM
I'm offering 1 MMC bounty for anyone who can get this to compile in Mac OSX 10.9
There is some problem with finding debian.h when I make it.
There is some problem with finding debian.h when I make it.
December 16, 2013, 09:07:22 AM
I have 0.00000005 MMC from a single vote, been mining more than 24 hours with nthing to show for it.
Anyway, if you wanna chat on skype or need help, barwizi is the name.
Ps i need more votes
MVTEcsoqoc4bVUHgVdxnQx2L53vm5UgXpM
Anyway, if you wanna chat on skype or need help, barwizi is the name.
Ps i need more votes
MVTEcsoqoc4bVUHgVdxnQx2L53vm5UgXpM
December 16, 2013, 09:06:50 AM
I'm hanging on, I rather enjoy the variability, and am looking forward to seeing the rewards ramp up.
I wonder if other MemoryCoiners can help me decide - I have some older AMD CPUs standing idle and was wondering which CPU based coin would be worth mining. These are Phenom X6 processors, so don't have AES or SSE which rules out the latest releases (MMC, Quark, Molecule, Protoshares). Is there anything worthwhile?
I wonder if other MemoryCoiners can help me decide - I have some older AMD CPUs standing idle and was wondering which CPU based coin would be worth mining. These are Phenom X6 processors, so don't have AES or SSE which rules out the latest releases (MMC, Quark, Molecule, Protoshares). Is there anything worthwhile?
December 16, 2013, 08:59:21 AM
I get this message when I open the wallet, which is now 25 hours behind.
"Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
Upgrade to what? Is there a new wallet out? Will I lose the current amount of MMC if I upgrade?
"Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
Upgrade to what? Is there a new wallet out? Will I lose the current amount of MMC if I upgrade?
December 16, 2013, 08:58:19 AM
God...block 223 have a higher diff than 222.
EDIT : block 223 found in less than a minute with the biggest diff ever... variance? that's sketchy
Yeah, 1785. After 223 was mining for 3 hours. (block 224 was found after 1 minute)EDIT : block 223 found in less than a minute with the biggest diff ever... variance? that's sketchy
That's a proper variance of hell.
December 16, 2013, 08:54:44 AM
God...block 223 have a higher diff than 222.
EDIT : block 223 found in less than a minute with the biggest diff ever... variance? that's sketchy
EDIT : block 223 found in less than a minute with the biggest diff ever... variance? that's sketchy
Yeah, 1785. After 223 was mining for 3 hours. (block 224 was found after 1 minute)
December 16, 2013, 08:53:23 AM
224 on my computer
December 16, 2013, 08:52:20 AM
God...block 223 have a higher diff than 222.
EDIT : block 223 found in less than a minute with the biggest diff ever... variance? that's sketchy
EDIT : block 223 found in less than a minute with the biggest diff ever... variance? that's sketchy
December 16, 2013, 08:52:14 AM
block 223 - beginn
December 16, 2013, 08:47:29 AM
I am out too, better use my a total of like 22 hashespermin for something else (like primecoin (even the 10dif), protoshares, datacoin (now with pool), whatever), than helping destroy block 222 
December 16, 2013, 08:43:53 AM
We need a bounty to defeat block 222.
If we can't beat him, all miners will be gone and the coin will fail.
If we can't beat him, all miners will be gone and the coin will fail.
December 16, 2013, 08:43:46 AM
I don't think it's the difficulty adjustment that's the issue. Probability is really hard to predict with such a low amount of hashes per minute. I think that as miners are optimized and get quicker, that the coin will stabilize.
My CPU hashes QRK at 60,000,000 hashes per minute, with this it hashes 2.5, lol.
Just my thoughts.
K.
My CPU hashes QRK at 60,000,000 hashes per minute, with this it hashes 2.5, lol.
Just my thoughts.
K.
Actually you may be into something here. Many people that have received 0 coins after 10+ hours are gone, and there is no mining pool (because it's not a clone of another coin, so it takes time to open a pool). Few people are left mining. With the difficulty that high and very few hashes per minute we could find the next block in 5 minutes, or 5 days.
Exactly, I stopped mining it
December 16, 2013, 08:42:46 AM
for this coin PTS less value...and this is so SCAM coin... 
It should have more value per coin than PTS, since it's much more scarse.
December 16, 2013, 08:41:06 AM
Haha that block 222 is immortal.
for this coin PTS less value...and this is so SCAM coin... December 16, 2013, 08:39:39 AM
I don't think it's the difficulty adjustment that's the issue. Probability is really hard to predict with such a low amount of hashes per minute. I think that as miners are optimized and get quicker, that the coin will stabilize.
My CPU hashes QRK at 60,000,000 hashes per minute, with this it hashes 2.5, lol.
Just my thoughts.
K.
My CPU hashes QRK at 60,000,000 hashes per minute, with this it hashes 2.5, lol.
Just my thoughts.
K.
Actually you may be into something here. Many people that have received 0 coins after 10+ hours are gone, and there is no mining pool (because it's not a clone of another coin, so it takes time to open a pool). Few people are left mining. With the difficulty that high and very few hashes per minute we could find the next block in 5 minutes, or 5 days.
Jump to: