way to know is waitting white paper and will be had tomorrow.
Even the white paper could be a fairy tale. Haven't we seen that too many times in the past? What really counts are the real features, that work. I don't really understand what is supporting the hefty marketcap. Newbie dev with huge premine and (for now) empty promises - it is as if the last 6 months in crypto are ignored for this coin.
every project may has the same part of white paper and i suppose that is normal. but the point is not on the whole (white paper), but on the innovation - POM, hefty, and other things we don't know yet.
newbie? so what? one thing is the profit that it brings to us.
POM for now is a fairy tale. This coin has no features yet and even after the white paper there will be no features. And the dev is spending his time on his pool instead of letting the pool business to trusted third-party providers like suprnova - that doesn't create trust in the capabilities of this dev. Given that the whole valuation is built upon trust and expectations it seems odd to have such high hopes for someone who didn't prove anything yet.
Try to research yourself before spreading FUD. This coin was backed by a game studio (small though), and their product was demonstrated many times.
What is the name of the game studio? What are the names of people in this studio?
Videos show some android/iOS game development and I am not questioning that someone is developing a mobile game, the question is how to link the mobile game (what about desktop?) with the blockchain? There have been attempts in the past and all turned out to be failures.
Every month there are thousands of mobile games developed and every single developer can make a claim that he/she will link the game to the blockchain. Is that statement worth half a million dollars?
I am saying that these devs didn't show yet that they know crypto and they shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt until they prove otherwise.
