Man seeing all the same quotes the last pages gave me poo brain.
This may be the biggest ico success (once we get tokens that is) but it's by far the clunkiest I've ever participated in.
It's likely the fact they accepted waves and antshares (?!) but still I havnt been in an ico yet that had so many dash issues or even required an audit like this. All the rest were done with cool smart contract mechanisms and literally within 1 week (often 1 day) your tokens were distributed...even if explorer couldn't read them, MEW was able to tell you the balance and name of the token.
I've been in like 7+ ICOs now some of comparable funds raised and this one is the worst mechanically... the team being active makes up for it for most of us but to anyone who's gonna throw the 53 million card, this has had issues since the very beginning. The current issues seem to be now because of how many people have entered.
I really wish there wasn't an 'audit process' but hey you know what you invest in, if you don't then you're probably adhering to the old adage about a fool and his money...
This may be the biggest ico success (once we get tokens that is) but it's by far the clunkiest I've ever participated in.
It's likely the fact they accepted waves and antshares (?!) but still I havnt been in an ico yet that had so many dash issues or even required an audit like this. All the rest were done with cool smart contract mechanisms and literally within 1 week (often 1 day) your tokens were distributed...even if explorer couldn't read them, MEW was able to tell you the balance and name of the token.
I've been in like 7+ ICOs now some of comparable funds raised and this one is the worst mechanically... the team being active makes up for it for most of us but to anyone who's gonna throw the 53 million card, this has had issues since the very beginning. The current issues seem to be now because of how many people have entered.
I really wish there wasn't an 'audit process' but hey you know what you invest in, if you don't then you're probably adhering to the old adage about a fool and his money...
If you would be so kind to list all of the "Issues" that has been going on since the beginning I'd be very happy to reply to all of them. I've had none, not a single one and I've been here since day 1.
No other ICO has raised comparable funds to MGO. None.
I've participated in several ICO's as well. Probably close to 10. None of them have run smoothly, none of them has been as serious as this one, none of them have worked fully once they released their tokens (which by the way took way longer than 1 week in all of the ones I've participated in).
If the audit is your biggest issue here and something that you dislike.. you are an idiot. Plain and simple. Secure and Professional is what I'd call it making an audit. It will take days, not weeks or months.
Lol I was waiting for a shill. Have you been active in the thread since day 1?...
You're an idiot for thinking a difference of opinion equates to intelligence. You stink so hard of shill (and I bet you i put more capital on anyway
) it's not really funny.We're you in since week 1? And you didn't notice randomly getting more tokens as discounts were finally factored in?
Or the people with login issues?
And like I said many others were equally professional without a long audit...also how is 30 million+ not comparable to 53?
How is a 30m project instantly giving out tokens somehow so far off from a 53m taking some weeks and getting ddos'd etc?...
You're such a moron dude go shill for another ico I'm both short and long with this and you're not touching what I'm gonna gain from this project.
Smh my opinion gave you aspergers attack apparently and you need put in your place...i could've whale-slammed this ICO and be 100% long and I would still have my opinion. A project raises 30m and has tokens on exchanges within 4 days...and somehow you think the 20 extra million warrants a much longwe wait...
I really could care less I'm both long and short here but it's my opinion and it's born of factual happenings.
The past has already proven you wrong with multiple 25-30m projects (not to mention the speed of the DAO, despite its fail) and the future will prove you wrong when we get 100m funded projects on exchanges the next day
I'm not even sure how to address you right now. Did I hit a nerve or what?
I've been here since day 1, yes. I've seen people reporting problems (as they do with each and every project out there in the world, all_the_time). Does not mean anything. 90% of the time someone did not read up before spamming their stupid questions in here.
So my tokens went up and then they went down? Wow. That's a huge mistake, right? Do you know the meaning of the word "Estimation", try a dictionary if not.
Saying that something is broken is not a matter of opinion, that's stating a fact. You did write that there were a lot of issues. Not an opinion therefor I never said that you having a different opinion equaled you being an idiot. But thank you for proving yet again that you are indeed, an idiot.
Please show me the ICO that raised $30,000,000 and hours after it closed people had their tokens and could use them. I dare you.
Am I shilling? For giving you a reply that you did not like? I've spoken rarely in here but sometimes I do feel like I need to reply to some individuals who clearly are spreading misinformation.
I'm not going to touch near what you will gain from this project? Really? You could "whale slam" this project and be 100% long? Really? Who the fuck do you think you are.. Member!?
Again, I never attacked your opinion. You claim it's factual but you are so deluded.
I'll be willing to bet you that no project that raises $100,000,000 unless 20 years from now will have everything up and running and ready to trade on exchanges within 24 hours. You can quote me on that.
