Topic: [ANN] MOBILEGO Crowdfund [$53 Million] - Decentralized Mobile Gaming Solutions - page 55. (Read 406984 times)

   guys I'm confused a little, this coin is worth of something or lost its value? any forecasts? 50 cents, 1, 2, 5, 10 usd?

You are boring us with noob talk without any information. At least I"m asking and telling the things that happened. Can you stop fudding for real

I've had people not understand me in this thread when I say short and long...cause they assume being short means shorting the market or something.

You can be long term without having your money tied up in a gamble of belief for possibly years and years.... If MGO ends up following through with their promises then I can always buy back, and now much much more. But based on the intentional lack of transparency, and multiple milestone issues like news coverage or major exchanges, I wouldn't bet the farm on it if I were you.

That said if it's like $100 who cares just leave it in there.

If it's closer to $10000 that might have started as 16 or so, you might start weighing the odds a bit differently as to whether or not you "believe" that hard...

I'm sure tons and tons of people lost their asses by going long on belief in the internet bubble.... or real estate lul.

I'm just trying to sow a little reasonable doubt due to complete and apparently intentional (MGO apparently doesn't want to run like a crypto foundation but as some corporation the likes of google) lack of transparency. I love mankind and it's killing me watching shills throughout the whole bubble get people to bet their houses on a market they clearly don't understand, despite legendary status. Then when you bust your ass they try and act innocent and say "don't invest more than you can lose"....

You know damn well that caveat is like any other warning that s there for the law only... they shilled you up but then throw that in there as a disclaimer so you can't sue them for essentially hypnotizing someone in an inexperienced position.

I was one of the few telling people to stay away from bitcoin... But no... 100k in a week they says... 7k lol they says....

Forever in crypto I meant to say if I didn't say it. There are also tons and tons of progress with no "transparent" progress. But there are many that have accomplished milestones that are less than a year old.

Agreed that's not how SOME for profit companies work, but nothing in crypto today is necessarily conventional. I don't agree with lack of transparency but I believe it's the projects right to go whichever direction the team wishes.

I'm obviously holding a small sum of MGO but the thing is if REAL progress starts occurring to the point where real trading occurs, not just shills and speculators from this thread, then I can buy well over the 35k ish that I started with in the ICO, and that s because I was able to sell out just before price dropped below $1... So if I had listened to the "strong" hands who have no doubts in the project, I would have strong (an argument to be had there) and incredibly poor hands at this point in time. Selling my MGO allowed the funds to buy hundreds of thousands of ENJ at 2 cents...


So basically get to announcing crap and try harder to get on some decent exchanges, and we can get a real handle on what appropriate price is.

Everything is being hit but literally 98% of the other ccoins  i follow are younger than MGO but all have already hit a few milestones and are still holding anywhere from 3x to 8x.

They're not being held up by nothing... they're held up by weekly announcements and typically large amounts of transparent progress.


If by Summer there's still no news no nothing of substance then I'll start getting funky feelings about intent. Many projects have successfully implemented PoS or miners within weeks of completing ICO... But I guess by your response GAME has been around for years but was under poor management, and then shifted ownership and came out with progress a little under 2 years later?

That's my problem now, I never saw a good price of MGO despite the long period of time but understand that it's a big project and every project has
their timeline to follow. In my case, if I will see MGO pump, I am not still gonna sell because I am into long term, so with the current price or price trend
it help me not to be tempted in selling my holding.

Lol.  As if we have a choice to leave with a crashed price and joke liqudity across a plethora of scam exchanges.  You've held all of us hostage when all we did to you was hand you 300 million dollars on a silver platter.  Yeah we want MGO to succeed, but don't act like you haven't completely botched every opportunity to make investors happy from May until now

GAME out forever...? The current team took over and began developing in 2016, this is a public fact. It hasn't been out forever. The payment processor, the mobile store distribution system, the mining client/pc store, GNation, and all of the stuff you haven't seen (which is 80-90% of development) has been done since then. And what you see is a lot different than what we have. I've said since the beginning this isn't going to be a project where you see most of our development. That's not how for profit companies work. I don't encourage anyone to believe me off of faith, that's fine because you'll see soon enough if you stick around. But saying GameCredits has done nothing compared to other projects since 2016 is ridiculous.

While I agree after a certain point it might be futile to even respond, possibly due to digging a bigger hole... but just objectively, you're a freaking moron.

You're advising the community manager put someone on ignore because he has nothing left to say to him? If Jack doesn't want to respond to him, that's perfectly fine I still respect that. But to literally make it so you can't see what he says, just because you don't like/can't solve what he's bitching about.... lol man. Good thing you will never run an ICO.

Glad I know better than to listen to idiots with high-activity... otherwise I likely would've ignored Fallenz on your 'advice'




Dog...fallacious much?

Zomg a bunch of retarded shills with high post counts can't logically accept they made an incredibly stupid investment decision, and a handful of 'trolls'.

I get what you're saying but you realize he obviously can't know all the sentiment...and neither can you just from bitcointalk. You seriously just made me chuckle, thank you. High activity low logic. Nice. Seems to be a trend on forums xD

You guys shilling for pages and pages had me fooled too but I snapped out of the hopium smoke. Even if you try and try and try to believe you're in this for the long term, your lot look stupid then for 'buying more' as many have said, all the while you could've bought at the bottom, which is still yet to be seen.... amassing far far more than you could've by buying at the end of the ICO.

So, which is it? Are you a fool or not? If you guys are REALLY in it for the long term, then you clearly can't read the market or you would'nt have been shilling every time the price got high (nothing at all to do with MGO, but rather crypto bubble). If you CAN read the market, then why not wait for the crash that many of us have been waiting for?...

I'm just not understanding the disconnect. It seems as soon as some 'shill' gets called out, they fall back on the long term argument... I actually fell for it too but then I realized I look like an idiot buying MGO at 75 cents after ICO when who knows, I might be able to get MGO for 15 cents this year.



You don't have the experience to talk bro. Evidenced by your comment.

It's like I'm watching tons of people fall for some dieting scam, and little do you idiots realize it might kill you... but you're "believing" so hardcore that you just think anyone else doesn't understand what you understand.

Don't be stupid, stupid. Funny that someone like you calls others morons...

No one wanted a guaranteed ROI...not sure where someone said "where is my guaranteed ROI?" but rather that projects with faster development are HOLDING their ROI during these crashes, while this project is seriously one of a FEW that is below what most people paid in the ICO.

The issue is, there is so much 'belief' in this thread compared to others, that it's sickening. Facks like you come in and add nothing, when all the points are relevant. The lessons you're going to likely learn from all this belief will be immense if you open your eyes. In the time since I sold my MGO and leveraged my money I could get hundreds of thousands of MGO...and I started off with over 30k from the ICO. So I was falling for all these fools and their belief. It wasn't til I slowly began to see which people clearly knew what they were talking about, and which didn't that I realized the underlying issues.


You're likely NEVER going to be as successful with crypto as me and those whose opinions I respect. Unlike lots of whales I didn't start with a lot of capital but once I got to actually understand crypto after about 2 years I started making great gains. First I had to learn the 'belief' lesson though.

Please, since you're such a believer... riddle me how GAME has been out forever (in crypto years) with really MINIMAL progression or development compared to 99% of other projects. A vast majority of the ICO's I've participated in had working product within 3 months of ICO finish. They HAD things worked out pre-ico but took time to implement, and the money allows that time to be spent as such. There are plenty with these poor development issues, but there are countless COUNTLESS that are doing much more, much more quickly.

In the time you hodl'd and essentially lost money with regards to time lost leverage, I could buy 1000x the MGO you hold because I didn't just sit there and hodl because people mistakenly made me believe in a project, instead of believing in transparent progress.



You've got a few more years I think...




Take your belief all the way to the bank... oh wait....

Lol I hate to poke the bear... or possibly salmon in this case, but iirc I called out the ICO having issues that were just ridiculous relative to many other successful ICOs, and you shilled back then too and conveniently forgot saying how the ICO had 0 issues or that all ICO's have issues. Something to that effect.


You let your post count get to your head, because you likely have longer time in crypto but clearly less knowledge about the market than, say I do.


Smooth is objective unfortunately...when other comparable ICO's had none of the issues all the 'trolls' are complaining about. If, in your opinion (which I'm starting to think is worthless from your new responses), you think an ICO should deliver on dates etc, then you're already making yourself look stupid because they had various issues notwithstanding angering people with extensions. But how about the roadmap that people keep citing to no avail?


It seems as though people stay quiet when incredibly logical and valid points and concerns are being presented, and then they wait for the dumb angry poster and jump in to defend the project.


And you wonder why people are calling you shills saying you must work for the project?... Could it be, if you were to re-read your posts you would see you seem to conveniently ignore any relevant points?...

Your veil is incredibly thick.


I'm incredibly busy as of late but I can't wait to see what pseudo-intelligent post I get back from this!!!!


Or maybe this is too logical for you and you'll just ignore it like everything else 

Hhampuz talks with authority but from my experience with him he hasn't learned jack all from his supposed 'experience' in cryptocurrency. It took me YEARS before I was confident to do more than just believe and hodl...   I thought early on that he was a shill for the team but I think he's just an anal-retentive guy who likes to try and argue online for self esteem or something.


Idgaf what terms of service are in ICO's, every ICO project OWES everything to it's investors...

I think Hhampuz forgot who pays for these things. It was not intended to be a gamble, however with the mainstreaming of crypto it was inevitable I supposed that it turned to what it is today, where it's more risks and wagers than investing in the future. What's sad is people all over crypto, case in point this thread, are trying to hold onto 'old' (god how fast time is going now a days) notions of investment. When I put into Eth, it was out of belief and hoping for the future, now I will always keep a smidge in a token but other than that I believe in MONEY. It was hard for me to accept but with this rising tide ruining all real price discovery, wtf can you do? You can hodl and tell people in threads that they're trolls and fud'ers, or you can trade with the stupid user base market trends. I love when people call you 'weak hands' when you make another 50k by being 'weak', and can turn around and buy 100x the tokens IF you actually believe in it. Anyone who has really learned the market may not regret missing out, but you will sure as hell feel the nut shot when you buy, say MGO, at $1.25 only to watch it drop to like 30 cents.... sure you may hodl but in your head you know you could've gotten 4x the tokens if you didn't listen to shills with high post counts telling you MGO $5 in a month because the team is making such rapid progress....


If a team has almost 0 progress before ICO (sad for me to realize that GAME was essentially a color coin with a dream) and thousands of people fund them.... then they owe EVERYTHING to those people... I think people have gotten too into legalese language because they're pulling contractual arguments pretty hard... "You clicked 'ok' saying you don't own any of this project!!!!.... that's fine but we paid for it and expect transparency and rapid development.

It makes me sad to see high post count people shilling saying 'they care about our security, so sue them for trying!'... you know that tons of noobs have taken their advice when seeing random posts... I know I've gotten reassured when I see legendary's agreeing with me. Big mistake. Trust what sounds TRUE to you. And if time and time again your 'true' is proven wrong, start reassessing your truth compass.

I say this not as a fudder as many argh-tards as many try to rationalize, but as someone who REALLY fell for the hype train that people like Hhampuz helped pump up, saying things with a high post count about how much potential this company has....

They MAY have potential, but if you go back in time to when they shilled these things, there was literally no progress.... white papers, promises, and failed milestones. Makes you wonder if these guys are psychic or something. Sure an idea may be cool in abstract but how can we say anything has potential without results first?...

FFS the whole crypto sphere has been in a bubble that no one wants to listen about, and then they think because their crap asset has gone up WITH EVERYTHING that it must be a sign that the token is undervalued... They built a platform for waves and ethereum. I don't believe this, but just to muse about, what if in 5 years waves AND ether aren't a thing...failed projects overtaken by a hungrier competitor.

I just keep thinking how AOL and Netscape aren't even known by the younger generation, and they were the top competitors... Seriously, with color coins and just constant innovation why does bitcoin become the de facto victor? When enough people realize the truth about all these tokens and their supposed innovations (aka promises) they'll start flocking to only those with real progress and updates. Watch how quickly a token becomes untradeable because everything flocks out en masses except for all the 'strong hands' and shills.


I know the shills don't care anyway, they think I'm a troll (and lol, they're not necessarily wrong) but MGO could very well revolutionize something, but I think a lot of the hype for EVERY asset is noobs not understanding the bubble. So what if there's a project right now silently working harder than them on the same goal?...

But whatever MGO will likely receive SOME news coverage eventually, Jack definitely just said a few pages back that they'll be at the game convention thing that ENJIN will be at. Well I don't care to go back and find the post but I know he at least insinuated it by saying something to the effect of: "Just because it's not announced doesn't mean a project won't be showcased at that event"

I gave an estimated date for when we first spoke to them. I never said that was the last time. We've spoken to these exchanges multiple times since we first contacted them.

Okay.  How about you just re-apply to all three exchanges again then?  If Bittrexx was as far back as May then you can't expect them to remember you.  There must have been over 1,000 cryptocurrencies and tokens released since then so there cannot be much harm in trying again.  Plus, you guys have a much more developed team with the GNation umbrella and such.  Also, you gotta keep in mind that they might actually be a lot warmer to listing MGO with all that time has passed if things are smoother on their end.  Thanks.

It's very pleasant for me to watch how MobileGo price have grown up till the last time. But total situation on the market is very bad.

I kind of hate coming to this thread to check what is happening but I need the scoop from time to time. Seriously why does the vibe in this joint always have to be negative, people swearing, and awful treatment of fellow humans? I mean seriously guys lets get a few things straight please.

1) People invest into ICOs to make money yes, but you aren't guaranteed an ROI that is not how life works. Nothing in life is guaranteed, feel that and figure that out now.

2) Props to you @jack for dealing with these morons because if it were me I would have stopped responding oh about 4 months ago.

3) Everyone who is here needs to calm down and if not then leave us. Seriously there is no room for your whiny ass shit. If you dislike MGO, what MGO has done, then leave simple as that.

So what is my relation to the project? IMO a perfect ICO is an ICO that delivers on the dates it has set forth, time to start it and allow people to deposit and the time from it being closed to having the tokens being sent out.. You do realize that when you buy in to any ICO you basically buy shares, and get tokens/coins whatever they offer. AFAIK MGO never promised anyone any crazy returns over the short term.

Is this the first ICO you have been a part of? Let me tell you about the story of Antshares (Now NEO) and how their ICO went.. They barely had any english communication while offering their ICO to us in the west world, they had a bunch of issues during the time of raising the funds and some weird transactions that went unexplained. Once they launched their wallet so that people could start collecting their coins it was extremely broken and barely anyone could get it to work.. This went on for a few months (yes, months) and there were numerous of instances of people investing tens of bitcoins couldn't even claim their coins.

Where are they now? Do you think I regret going through the rough looking at how it all turned out? I have about 237x more confidence in Jack and the MGO team so yeah..

Perfection is subjective, you can't tell me that I'm wrong if I believe this ICO went smooth and was indeed perfect.

We spoke to Bittrex in May, that's when we approved, and then they made an error and we couldn't list. Polo was around the same time, but they didn't add a single coin for about 3-4 months, and then the SEC made their statement in July.

Binance is the strictest of the lot, and the most likely to be open to listing in the future. So I'm not saying anything. You can go through my post history if you want. I've spoken about them in the past.

Do you have a scroll wheel on your mouse?

Then scroll up and read the last 10 pages.
There's a lot of you, most of it... and a lot of 3 others.

That's not 6990...

If I were Jack, I would put you on ignore already.
Respect for him, still responding in a serious way to you.

If all the energy you put in complaining was put in support, MobileGo would be a top 10 coin already