Topic: [ANN] Nanite [XNAN] - X11 | PoS | HTML5/NodeJS | Point-of-Sale Software | Mobile - page 3. (Read 48357 times)

I'm just glad I have a portfolio to go back to, but I will hold some of these Nanites in case something is fixed/rescued.  Not a big enough investor to have an easy exit usually, so I'm often stuck.  I personally try to jump on new coins because I feel like its a great opportunity to make bigger returns but with bigger potential returns, you get bigger risk.  I just wish the dev. wasn't fucking 12 yours old (based on very immature behavior) and/or anti-social.  Nobody with a sane mind and behavior that is not reckless, would ever jeopardize peoples money, especially after they failed so hard previously.  Then to have the fucking balls to lie to everyone and say they aren't the Sparkcoin developer.  Dude, I hope you summon the wraith of Anon and your face gets smeared all over the net for posterity sake.  The only reason I defended dev. originally was because of his statements saying he wasn't Sparkcoin.  At least if he was honest, he might have a chance to sell his stupid ASICs.  It's obviously the type of dev. who even considers having a ASIC who would do this.  Maybe I should just trust developers who are committed to GPU only future.

I am so glad i didn't bought in!

Glad I sold fast before fork with very small -.

Wait 7 days and he'll bring out the next clone... Sparkite probably

So scammy dev dipped out?  Atleast I sold 75% of my coins mined and bought somemore Sterlingcoin. No scammy devs over there. 

I will wait Antminer s4 for $157...

i think when all is said and done - only the dev will have the last say ...

agreeing with a lot of what was said - and not agreeing with a lot also ...

its a proof thing ... bittrex is down with the coin due to the fork ... there is a lot to be said about those coins that have been around for a while ...

what amazes me is that there are SO many jumpers ... when a 'new' coin gets hyped - there is interest ... but for the longer term coins that are still proving they will be around - there is little interest ...

like i said - im amazed - BUT - this is unfortunately the way things go in crypto-land ...

once again - only the dev will have the last say - unless the community have a dev to take over AND the original dev wants to abandon ...

the coin is only a few days old though - so only time will tell whether the dev pulls through with this ...

#crysx

I warned all of you when the price was still 4000satoshi.

It's obvious since the beginning its the same dev, but he couldve at the least fixed the source properly for his new one..

It was fixed by the Community for Spark, these patches should also work for Nanite. I did not follow the fixes though so I'm not sure, its worth a try though.

Any possibility of Bittrex fixing this?  I don't understand why they are allowing these markets to even open if this issue existed.  This is such a bad thing for crypto and yes you were correct it seems.  Nanite/Sparkcoin Dev., you are a fucking lying piece of shit.  I hope your shit gets hacked.

for now its pretty much safest to leave them in your wallet.

so how bad is? I have few k in my wallet ... 6 active connection and doesn't sync, what can I do?

I never posted the points ? You did read my first posts on this thread ? Look at page 2,3,4,5 ...

EDIT:

Here is the Link for you Sir

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9463390

No you don't, you want to rub it in their face. Fair enough though I've commended you for your trading spirit. You never posted the points.

I just feel sorry for the folks who listened to the "hypers" as they were giving them a feeling this coin has anything special/new/good and talked the flaws/bugs/red flags away.

If it makes you feel better just do it. You shouldn't ask people when you should troll. Real trolls don't listen to other people until you incite them.

So should I re-post my warning posts from the first three and the last three pages or is everyone still hyping this clone ? ^^

For reference, here's my getblock results on 4202 and 4203:

4202:
{
    "hash" : "e49b1992152d36fdf5555ac60700aba4886255b2c14066ed934e956ef12458e3",
    "confirmations" : 409,
    "size" : 477,
    "height" : 4202,
    "version" : 6,
    "merkleroot" : "8cc0d7f34cc7f87a0d9a42ce3eec45d918886deea2671c1f81d9c1c2fddfd1c3",
    "mint" : 84.34398075,
    "time" : 1415654427,
    "nonce" : 0,
    "bits" : "1e0fffff",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "blocktrust" : "100001",
    "chaintrust" : "1aeb4d83320212",
    "previousblockhash" : "40a1163af225a3d1475fcf04c3d1042b491ad4964e13e5dce3437727f0cab016",
    "nextblockhash" : "28020c226f87847ae6c686bb72b7d876120ed2375e66809c06dded33ab5bc922",
    "flags" : "proof-of-stake stake-modifier",
    "proofhash" : "000b6963fe74d29e6b9e2d01875f1735abe7432694ccb93e30873df9a28b055d",
    "entropybit" : 1,
    "modifier" : "5c972a361b61aae9",
    "modifierchecksum" : "2a426b62",
    "tx" : [
        "451113187c36d738910b2219e57fe209db70b28c748c516d1df2df39c27107b3",
        "5b94cd566fce6b8280f8a0d554a10ab31effdacdf0a6ab2a7a17fd75989f6af3"
    ],
    "signature" : "3044022041dccf9faf8f6a4695eb3421e20401fe7b28387baf21613ffdc89a25b72f540b022064b 8467ccc4ffa5dab96bf0b9326d86abf6bcbe74d19f034f3f6ef21f2cf3598"
}

4203:
{
    "hash" : "28020c226f87847ae6c686bb72b7d876120ed2375e66809c06dded33ab5bc922",
    "confirmations" : 408,
    "size" : 478,
    "height" : 4203,
    "version" : 6,
    "merkleroot" : "a223782eb21bc0088df064b0c4adbb89b9eabfbd11f8d0bd3cb33cd98f4408e6",
    "mint" : 0.10404048,
    "time" : 1415654573,
    "nonce" : 0,
    "bits" : "1e0fffff",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "blocktrust" : "100001",
    "chaintrust" : "1aeb4d83420213",
    "previousblockhash" : "e49b1992152d36fdf5555ac60700aba4886255b2c14066ed934e956ef12458e3",
    "nextblockhash" : "b7946e501afc26f79f753b12312ea8267ba728dc03fa69ae22e7dc9055644083",
    "flags" : "proof-of-stake",
    "proofhash" : "0000238653d25a241b7db0d33a7b2bc613719a60e95c8c62282d6dcaacc0a61c",
    "entropybit" : 0,
    "modifier" : "5c972a361b61aae9",
    "modifierchecksum" : "da238e17",
    "tx" : [
        "8879d93b9083f5c17b7c802bd9d521262dc2fa49bdcc89740d95eba3dc167619",
        "4acb0720db58cef1eec9c359e431528e4ffeb14c8111472cfae13c1e3b907b5a"
    ],
    "signature" : "3045022100c7552f4050780f258c48f526402f9c1ae799da6cf67ae78479a5ed33ceb6c02102203 c46762d826e423546cc19aa926bfeaf4ef3de855b80db9e9759a423d7202578"
}

The coin currently is forked.

We have identified two distinct forks:
1 has Bittrex, Coin-swap and Ipominer confirmed on it
The other one has SuchPool and Trademybit on it..

Simlar issue to Sparkcoin, obviously because it's the same dev/code.

Waiting for updates.

The network has split at block 4203. You can see by comparing block hashes:

The first fork shows blockhash of 28020c226f87847ae6c686bb72b7d876120ed2375e66809c06dded33ab5bc922
The other fork shows blockhash of 44e8487a517d27206ac1d4da9bbf724f90d5199f8523fcd7ccd61fe03f11e77c