Author

Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!! - page 350. (Read 2085654 times)

full member
Activity: 201
Merit: 100
Some one just bought 1980000 NAVcoins on alcurEX , 37 btc worth at 1900 Sato. Sign of New Big Investor entering the Market ? Prepare for Another Price Pump?

https://alcurex.com/#NAV-BTC

Number 2 volume on Alcurex.
Number 2??

"1   alcurEX   NAV/BTC   $ 25,531   $ 0.012894   91.39 %"
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/nav-coin/#tab-markets
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Some one just bought 1980000 NAVcoins on alcurEX , 37 btc worth at 1900 Sato. Sign of New Big Investor entering the Market ? Prepare for Another Price Pump?

https://alcurex.com/#NAV-BTC

Number 2 volume on Alcurex.
full member
Activity: 201
Merit: 100
Some one just bought 1980000 NAVcoins on alcurEX , 37 btc worth at 1900 Sato. Sign of New Big Investor entering the Market ? Prepare for Another Price Pump?

https://alcurex.com/#NAV-BTC
hero member
Activity: 794
Merit: 510
NavCoin Founder
Any news or information about it can be accepted in some large Chinese exchange Huh

I have sent requests to yuanbao.com and btc38.com, both have forwarded the details to their development teams.

I have no further information for you at this time sorry. I will follow up with them and see if they can offer a timeframe.

Do you have any suggestions for other CNY exchanges we can be traded on?

Cheers!
full member
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Any news or information about it can be accepted in some large Chinese exchange Huh
hero member
Activity: 794
Merit: 510
NavCoin Founder
Hi Nav Community,

I have just made some updates to the website to display our latest press releases and published articles:

You can see it here: http://www.navcoin.org/news

This will be where we publish our press releases moving forward, so if you're a blogger or otherwise, please bookmark this page to get Nav Coin news hot off the press.

We are making good progress on our road map and Sophia is busy writing press releases about our progress, so keep your finger on the F5 key!

Talk Soon,
Craig.
hero member
Activity: 794
Merit: 510
NavCoin Founder
Hmm, this is something we will investigate. Thanks for bringing it to our attention Remy_5! You're a star as always Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502

I have to admit, I never measured until now. I make it human readable. It is up to block 181058 .

.navcoin2# du -h txleveldb/ blk0001.dat
145M    txleveldb/
90M     blk0001.dat

txindex is activated in that wallet!


In fact it is something that usually is not measured very often.

I got there by accident, trying to understand why the wallet took
so long to load so few blocks.
Reading between the lines of the messages in the forum, written by
other trusted users, I noticed that they also had some difficulties
in the initial sync.
 
From the data that you have shown, for which I thank you Shahim,
the difference seems remarkable, about 60% larger.
It must be noted that also in the "my" wallet the txindex is enabled.

What seems to be missing in the "standard" NAV wallet, is an option to
disable the updating of the addrindex.

The easiest way to do this, you can find it by making a side to side
comparison between the group of lines, in the standard Nav wallet code:
https://github.com/navcoindev/navcoin2/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1848
up to the line in 1892, and those lines that you can find here:
https://github.com/transferdev/Transfercoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2100
until the 2147 line.

Only a few lines seem to be missing, this could be an oversight in the
process of editing, or they may be removed for some good reasons, that
simply I do not know.

This is the reason why I asked Pakage, how much those additional features
are necessary for normal users.

This new wallet, is in some ways still a new thing, I think we still have
to know him well, and maybe there is still some details to be tuned.

 
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002


Now I have not a direct element of comparison with the directory's size
of a "normal" version of wallet, so I'm sorry for be so raw but I must ask,
how is big the yours?   Grin


I have to admit, I never measured until now. I make it human readable. It is up to block 181058 .

.navcoin2# du -h txleveldb/ blk0001.dat
145M    txleveldb/
90M     blk0001.dat

txindex is activated in that wallet!

regards
shahim
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 500


Now I have not a direct element of comparison with the directory's size
of a "normal" version of wallet, so I'm sorry for be so raw but I must ask,
how is big the yours?   Grin




xD Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502

You are still missing answers from us? I am sorry for that, guess they got lost in the action of the swap, which was a bit of work for all of us.


Ok, sometimes can happen.

You could start reading this first:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15111383

and then this:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15407396

they are both tightly connected.

This potentially can be an issue especially for you, I mean for the the raspberry
standalone staking unit.

In this case the size matter, and a high growth (and rewrite) of the txleveldb,
will also mean a high use of mass storage device I/O, with higher use of
CPU resource, which are both scarce in that type of micro computer.

But it is not just an issue for the raspberry, each type of node in theory is affected
by this slowdown, although a few may realize it, because it is progressive and
spread out over time.

Just FYI, I'm running a version of wallet with the continuous updating of data
used by that function disabled, so in this condition the size of my txleveldb dir
is currently 88.931.647 byte, at block 178978, while the blk0001.dat size
is 95.087.484 byte.

Now I have not a direct element of comparison with the directory's size
of a "normal" version of wallet, so I'm sorry for be so raw but I must ask,
how is big the yours?   Grin




newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
Good morning team NAV.

I think a few days ago I heard a NAV of course enter into a Chinese exchange. Proceeds this information?
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
Hey Remy,

thnx for your answers. You are still missing answers from us? I am sorry for that, guess they got lost in the action of the swap, which was a bit of work for all of us.

Good to you see you here again Smiley

thnx
Shahim
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502
I added ALL actually nodes and my connection rise from 4 to 6 connection after restart wallet. Now drop to 5 again. And again to 6 connection Tongue
But better anyway. Thx.

Hmmmm....
I have a curiosity, would you be so kind to look in your debug.log
to the rows with a text similar to these:
Loaded ### addresses from peers.dat ## ms
Flushed ### addresses to peers.dat ## ms

Apart from this, your firewall / nat / router or whatever it is, has
been set up to accept incoming connections on the wallet port?

hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502


Ok so if you have too less stakes it is because of the splitting of you coin blocks. You can see that when you activate coin control and go to the sending side.

The thing is, a block of 1000 coin can only stake once all few hours. When you have instead 10 blocks with 100 coins you will earn 10 stakes in that time. So it is a technic to split all coins to different addresses inside the wallet and let them stake. They will split each time the blocks stakes all alone but they need time for it and the more coinblocks you have from the beginning,  the bigger is your multiplicator.

I hope you understand what i mean.

Edit: where the ****is remy?  Wink


LOL!

Warning, a large senseless wall of text approaching.  Wink

There are be different types of staking strategies, that can be put
in place by choosing or not the size of the coin piles, and if put them
all into a single address or multiple addresses.

Each strategy has its pro and cons.  

For example, the strategy of having many small "piles", if on one hand
it allows to have a proportionally greater number of candidates to the
stake, at the same time each of them will have less "weight" and therefore
less possibility of producing a stake (especially if the posDiff has an
increase), and will produce interest on a smaller portion of the total
figure.

A single pile instead would have greater weight, and more probabilities
to produce a stake, but in case of bad luck, even a long time without seeing
anything positive.

As rightly pointed out, when stake a "pile" with more than 100 Nav,
it is automatically split into two new piles.

Instead, if the value of pile is lower, it is not split, then there is also
another mechanism start, that is little known, the dust collection.
When this happen, other piles are searched for that belong to the same address
of kernel pile and which have not staked from several time,
and if found, they can be collected together until they reach a figure
of about 1000 Nav.

This useful mechanism tends to recover the "dust coin pile" that due to
the split have become too small to be able to produce on their own
a new stake.

So, the strategy to split the "piles" in many different addresses, would
interfere with this recovery mechanism, and solitary pile too small could
end up not ever produce one stake or only after long time.

Fortunately, whether the pile are small or large, whether they produce
a stake after a short time, or after a long time, when staking they still
produce each a fair interest of around 5%, according to its age.

Of course, apart from these automatic mechanisms, can always be intervene
manually via the coin control, to subdivide or to aggregate in other sizes the
piles, and send-back them to own address.

Considering all this, many strategies are possible, which can be more or less
valid according to the own habit and figures in the field.

IMHO, Everyone should experience them personally, to develop the one that
suits him best.




hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502
In full 24hrs of staking, i had 187 transactions with 17 orphans.
Checked few other days too and everytime had around 7-10% orphans
is it normal?
Usually have 10-14 connections

Often a cause of too many orphani blocks, could be due to some
incomplete previous transaction (check with the rpc command "checkwallet").

However, sometimes it may be due to the simple fact that your PC has a
system time too early or late, and this is easy to check.

I also take this opportunity to remind everyone that the new
blockexplorer is very full of useful information, such as:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/nav/#!extraction
where you can find the list of topstaker, and also a diagram of orphan
blocks generated in the last week.

I really like this new blockexplorer.


hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502
So command "reapairwallet" was not working.
But after 5 days of synching to network i was able to get my founds to the wallet.
This is so bad because if someone have some transactions made before it was registered at wallet it
takes ages to synch. I think that "resacan" should be repaired i have used it in other coins and was not problem with that
here if i import any priv key i will have problem with synch data.

I think the command you are looking for is "-rescan", and it is
also present in NavCoin wallet, but it is not an RPC command that
you can use in the wallet when it is already running.

This is a command that must be invoked at the time of startup of
the wallet program, at the command prompt level or in the shell,
for example with:
navajocoin-qt  -rescan

This reviews the entire blockchain looking for missing transaction,
or which are not recorded in own wallet, and is a task quite long.

I imagine that you know well what it does, but I wrote this for completeness only.

hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502
Remy_5 is very nice and very pleasant I regret is not in NAV dev team to help peoples.
So where the f* is Remy Smiley Smiley Smiley

@up childrens is not here. In most countries you cant trading on markets (need registered and verify) if you not adult. Very sucks. Maybe we should build our Atlantis on sea for crypto and free world Sad

LOL!!

I'm still around here, for the moment...
and I'm still waiting for some technical answers by the DevTeam.  Tongue

Just to say, even just a one line reply, to understand if the question
has been read, and it was compresibile.

However, I saw that a few days ago here there was a lot of activity of
new names, and I imagined that a stickler b.+breaker like me, was
better to be quiet... just for the moment.

Thanks for the nice words, but I will not be part of NavTeam, a personal
decision I took many months ago.

Apart from that, you're wrong, how you might forget one of the oldest and at
the same time, the youngest investors of this forum, the son of Juguelo,
though I imagine that for now he can't yet read. Cheesy

hero member
Activity: 794
Merit: 510
NavCoin Founder
The new OP looks great guys. Awesome work. All stations are go for launch! Good to see the latest press release getting out there too.

Let's do this!
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
So command "reapairwallet" was not working.
But after 5 days of synching to network i was able to get my founds to the wallet.
This is so bad because if someone have some transactions made before it was registered at wallet it
takes ages to synch. I think that "resacan" should be repaired i have used it in other coins and was not problem with that
here if i import any priv key i will have problem with synch data.
 
I actually have imported with importprivkey and did a rescan. After 5 minutes i was able to rescan and had the coins ready to swap them....
Jump to: