Author

Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!! - page 358. (Read 2085654 times)

hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502

In some extreme case can help, but in normal condition this is not the best possible solution.


completely agree Remy.  however this seems to be needed as I only know of two definitive nodes on the old blockchain.  Without adding the max connections of 2,  the wallet could get confused by connecting with nodes on the new and old chain.  I should have added a disclaimer that is only done in certain situations and should be removed immediately after.

Perfect.  Grin Grin

In theory, the seed node should only propagate the correct nodes, but in this
transitional situation, where there are new and old wallet, all waiting on the same
port, there may be incomplete attempts.

PS:
In addition, if the wallet has been stopped for a _long_ time, it might be useful to
delete the old peers.dat file.

legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
hi, blockexplorer, I think requires a fix, because it doesn't show correctly the data from my wallet and data from blockexplorer in my purse a large amount than shows the total amount in blockexplorer

and about the new wallet 2.0, which is sometimes an error stops

the question is, when will be updated richlist after the swap?

thank you

Hi there is a richlist on cryptoid website (not updated in real time!) . Or do you mean the explorer inside the wallet. I don't really get your point. All time i have used it so check an address, it showed the correct amount.

If you can give more detailed information,  i can forward it to the explorer hosting
sr. member
Activity: 1313
Merit: 302
for anyone having syncing issues on the old chain, please try putting the following into your navcoin.conf file:

maxconnections=2
connect=95.183.50.58
connect=5.230.142.254

And REMOVE any other addnode lines from your config file.

What this does is only allows your wallet to have a maximum of 2 connections and the 'connect' variables will force the wallet to ONLY connect to the nodes listed above.

Without this, your wallet will try to connect to as many nodes as possible, whether on the new or old network and cause delays on syncing to the old chain.

once your wallet is open, you can verify if it has worked by typing, 'getpeerinfo'.  If you only have the nodes with IP's above, it worked.

I haven't test this on NAV since I had my coins on Bittrex for the swap, but the above method has saved numerous headaches for me on other coins.

Please let us know if this fixes the issue.

Remove the old obsolete addnde is correct, but so drastically restrict the number
of connections, IMHO not seem at all the best solution possible, and it does not help
other peers in the same condition.

Especially I would like to avoid that this idea was perceived as overall definitive solution,
valid in all cases, even in the future, because in the long run would be deleterious.

The proper functioning of a crypto currency is based on the creation of distributed
network of peers, sharing and exchange among themselves the blocks with the
transaction between all nodes.

Limit the nodes that way, it ends up transforming the structure of the peer's network of
cryptocoin in a centralized manner, making it very slow, and at the same time this
overloaded its supernodes, making them into weak points in a centralized structure.

In some extreme case can help, but in normal condition this is not the best possible solution.



completely agree Remy.  however this seems to be needed as I only know of two definitive nodes on the old blockchain.  Without adding the max connections of 2,  the wallet could get confused by connecting with nodes on the new and old chain.  I should have added a disclaimer that is only done in certain situations and should be removed immediately after.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
www.pumpmycoin.com
hi, blockexplorer, I think requires a fix, because it doesn't show correctly the data from my wallet and data from blockexplorer in my purse a large amount than shows the total amount in blockexplorer

and about the new wallet 2.0, which is sometimes an error stops

the question is, when will be updated richlist after the swap?

thank you
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
well to clarify. who i mean what i said about the complainers : people complaining primarily due to missing the pump..

In case that was aimed at me. I have been with Nav for the full 2 years. Did you note the grin at the end of my post?

I am not moaning at the devs. In fact I thanked them and have donated over those 2 years.

My point (like the vast number of long term Navsters vocal on this forum) is that the V1 issue is confusing and not helping. The devs ARE supporting V1 manually so we should switch V1 off until everyone is on the same fork.

Craig, Shahim, Soopy, Strugg etc. have all been performing 110% in the last few months and for that I am grateful.

And with regard to pumping and dumping only a fool would dump now with all the new fantastic features coming online.


uhmm do you know the shit storm the NAV dev would get if they simply cut it off. They are trying to honor a time frame. To allow other users , who are not as active as me and you, to get a chance to get their coins on the new chain.

the problem here , was that few exchanges, one of them being polo,  a freaking major exchange did not update in timely fashion.


you know what, i feel weird having to explain this over and over.. i don't see how the spike at polo is anything to argue about for.

devs are doing the right thing by extending the v1 life.

A swap period is fine and Devs will take care of that.Not an exchange that does not want to upgrade as per hard fork.That has changed now Poloniex will upgrade .

Manual to new coin is still available  and underway..Bittrex and Alcurex are back on track. Great talking to you
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
well to clarify. who i mean what i said about the complainers : people complaining primarily due to missing the pump..

In case that was aimed at me. I have been with Nav for the full 2 years. Did you note the grin at the end of my post?

I am not moaning at the devs. In fact I thanked them and have donated over those 2 years.

My point (like the vast number of long term Navsters vocal on this forum) is that the V1 issue is confusing and not helping. The devs ARE supporting V1 manually so we should switch V1 off until everyone is on the same fork.

Craig, Shahim, Soopy, Strugg etc. have all been performing 110% in the last few months and for that I am grateful.

And with regard to pumping and dumping only a fool would dump now with all the new fantastic features coming online.


uhmm do you know the shit storm the NAV dev would get if they simply cut it off. They are trying to honor a time frame. To allow other users , who are not as active as me and you, to get a chance to get their coins on the new chain.

the problem here , was that few exchanges, one of them being polo,  a freaking major exchange did not update in timely fashion.


you know what, i feel weird having to explain this over and over.. i don't see how the spike at polo is anything to argue about for.

devs are doing the right thing by extending the v1 life.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Put your music on
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
Mate! That Blockchain is only for the old client! Please delete all files there.

Then create a ".navcoin2" directory in your home and create the navcoin.conf .

Add these nodes to fasten the sync and let it sync:

addnode=1.10.221.32
addnode=1.10.221.56
addnode=1.34.180.245
addnode=104.236.223.182
addnode=108.95.144.170
addnode=109.110.66.76
addnode=118.173.178.240
addnode=122.166.167.187
addnode=122.53.112.74
addnode=123.3.30.61
addnode=14.192.209.23
addnode=160.176.171.123
addnode=171.6.250.169
addnode=175.214.144.141
addnode=176.154.77.92
addnode=184.167.180.122
addnode=185.17.207.189
addnode=185.61.148.209
addnode=199.189.131.12
addnode=2.121.162.167
addnode=2.84.167.61
addnode=208.95.215.81
addnode=212.180.171.44
addnode=213.108.119.84
addnode=219.88.236.170
addnode=219.88.238.26
addnode=41.142.44.167
addnode=45.50.28.121
addnode=5.230.146.212
addnode=60.53.25.89
addnode=73.10.170.79
addnode=73.254.153.254
addnode=76.21.107.113
addnode=77.121.108.134
addnode=77.236.177.243
addnode=78.88.29.171
addnode=79.42.100.117
addnode=81.156.249.127
addnode=84.52.229.225
addnode=84.84.197.176
addnode=87.113.188.239
addnode=87.195.35.125
addnode=88.217.180.223
addnode=90.200.245.58
addnode=91.153.109.149
addnode=92.45.169.75
addnode=93.185.20.219
addnode=93.185.20.248
addnode=95.183.50.54
addnode=95.183.51.15
addnode=95.183.53.184
sr. member
Activity: 373
Merit: 250
They walk among us...
well to clarify. who i mean what i said about the complainers : people complaining primarily due to missing the pump..

In case that was aimed at me. I have been with Nav for the full 2 years. Did you note the grin at the end of my post?

I am not moaning at the devs. In fact I thanked them and have donated over those 2 years.

My point (like the vast number of long term Navsters vocal on this forum) is that the V1 issue is confusing and not helping. The devs ARE supporting V1 manually so we should switch V1 off until everyone is on the same fork.

Craig, Shahim, Soopy, Strugg etc. have all been performing 110% in the last few months and for that I am grateful.

And with regard to pumping and dumping only a fool would dump now with all the new fantastic features coming online.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Hi there
I have around 30K navs and want to  transfer them from bittrex to my own wallet

I'm using the wallet on Linux, but i'm having a  few problems..........

fist of all what i have done:


╭─ivan@Rebbeca ~  ‹master*›
╰─➤git clone https://github.com/navcoindev/navcoin2

╭─ivan@Rebbeca ~  ‹master*›
╰─➤sudo apt-get install qt5-default qt5-qmake qtbase5-dev-tools qttools5-dev-tools build-essential libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev  libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev

╭─ivan@Rebbeca ~  ‹master*›
╰─➤sudo apt-get install libgmp3-dev

╭─ivan@Rebbeca ~  ‹master*›
╰─➤cd navcoin2

╭─ivan@Rebbeca ~/navcoin2  ‹master*›
╰─➤qmake

╭─ivan@Rebbeca ~/navcoin2  ‹master*›
╰─➤make

╭─ivan@Rebbeca ~/navcoin2  ‹master*›
╰─➤   ./NavCoin2-qt.pro
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 1: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: TEMPLATE: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 2: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: TARGET: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 3: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: VERSION: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 4: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: INCLUDEPATH: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 5: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: QT: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 6: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: DEFINES: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 7: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: DEFINES: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 8: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: CONFIG: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 9: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: CONFIG: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 10: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: CONFIG: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 12: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: CONFIG: not found
./NavCoin2-qt.pro: 14: ./NavCoin2-qt.pro: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")")

First error
Then i try to open the executable


╭─ivan@Rebbeca ~/navcoin2  ‹master*›
╰─➤  ./navcoin-qt

that open a nice UI  but  that say  12 weeks  behind.....
i download  http://www.navcoin.org/files/Navajo-Blockchain.zip
and extract it on  ~/.navcoin2  hidden folder
after  restar the app still  saying  12 weeks behind
Then i ask a frined   how use NAVS on windows and  told me to add a list of nods on a config flle
as far as i can se the only config file is the      ~/navcoin2/./NavCoin2-qt.pro
but i cant do that run.....


any clue  what i'm doing wrong Huh

cheers and  thanks in advance
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
NAV Coin [NAV]
Does anyone have a v1 addnode?

There You go:

maxconnections=2
connect=95.183.50.58
connect=5.230.142.254

Full instructions can be found here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15484291
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502
for anyone having syncing issues on the old chain, please try putting the following into your navcoin.conf file:

maxconnections=2
connect=95.183.50.58
connect=5.230.142.254

And REMOVE any other addnode lines from your config file.

What this does is only allows your wallet to have a maximum of 2 connections and the 'connect' variables will force the wallet to ONLY connect to the nodes listed above.

Without this, your wallet will try to connect to as many nodes as possible, whether on the new or old network and cause delays on syncing to the old chain.

once your wallet is open, you can verify if it has worked by typing, 'getpeerinfo'.  If you only have the nodes with IP's above, it worked.

I haven't test this on NAV since I had my coins on Bittrex for the swap, but the above method has saved numerous headaches for me on other coins.

Please let us know if this fixes the issue.

Remove the old obsolete addnde is correct, but so drastically restrict the number
of connections, IMHO not seem at all the best solution possible, and it does not help
other peers in the same condition.

Especially I would like to avoid that this idea was perceived as overall definitive solution,
valid in all cases, even in the future, because in the long run would be deleterious.

The proper functioning of a crypto currency is based on the creation of distributed
network of peers, sharing and exchange among themselves the blocks with the
transaction between all nodes.

Limit the nodes that way, it ends up transforming the structure of the peer's network of
cryptocoin in a centralized manner, making it very slow, and at the same time this
overloaded its supernodes, making them into weak points in a centralized structure.

In some extreme case can help, but in normal condition this is not the best possible solution.

hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502

I'm proud of poloniex. I hate these manual coin swaps. What was the reason why my addresses and balances couldn't be included in the genesis block of V2. I have my coins stored away for 5 years in a paper wallets. It's extremely annoying that I can get my coins stolen right out of my paper wallet. NAUT did this to me. My 200 NAUT paper wallet is now worthless! grrr

I understand your deep and sincere disappointment.
It must not have been easy to print five years ago a paperwallet for NavajoCoin,
expecially considering the fact that this coin was founded only two years ago.

I have to admit it, I'm really amazed by the ability to foresight of the future which you showed us.
Or instead more banally, do You have used a DeLorean?  Grin
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502
I see some "new" names in here blaming devs for this , My advice if u don't know what your talking about maybe u STFU ?




I think this represents very well the moment.

legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
well to clarify. who i mean what i said about the complainers : people complaining primarily due to missing the pump..

It's also not Fairplay  that 95% of  nvestors ms out on any pump that has NAV branding which required the majority of investors to swap to a New blockchain which brought about the exposure from coindesk . The coindesk article was about NAV  2.0. with links to the NAV exchanges.

Now all this is fixable.

When Poloniex upgrade we can do another article with the upgrade News.

Happy Days ahead we just need to fix this spaghetti!
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Does anyone have a v1 addnode?
legendary
Activity: 2020
Merit: 1041
I see some "new" names in here blaming devs for this , My advice if u don't know what your talking about maybe u STFU ?
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1004
Very big difference of price between 2 exchanges this is making me feel like stupid why I have my coins on trex, what is update when NAV1.0 will be swapped to NAV2.0 on polo?
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
well to clarify. who i mean what i said about the complainers : people complaining primarily due to missing the pump..
Jump to: