I'm doing a feature story on NavajoCoin for Altcoinpress.com. Does anyone have a link to a large transparent logo image?
And this post is the best example for all fudders. I will let it with no comment... Please think yourself.
Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!! - page 496. (Read 2085654 times)
And this post is the best example for all fudders. I will let it with no comment... Please think yourself.
I'm doing a feature story on NavajoCoin for Altcoinpress.com. Does anyone have a link to a large transparent logo image?
Thank You! I've sent You links in PM. Please let me know if You need more
Cheers!
~ Strugg
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
What problem do You have?
Besides web wallet, which delay we have been discussing and explaining a few times already, what else have been missed?
Multipool is live now - just like announced.
Redesign will start by the end of this week - just like announced.
Sorry, but You sound like You just want to spread negativity.
Regards
~ Strugg
Sure, I agree, it's pretty simple.
@everyone: Keep in mind that all developments are paid in full by our personal funds.
We did not have IPO/Premine/Instamine or any other financial support.
There were very few donations from some of our dear supporters.
But these people, who argue the most ("do more, do faster, do something else") never donated a single $.
If You want to see something done - give something from yourself and help.
If You don't want to do that - just let us do our work and stop fudding.
Simple as that.
Regards
~ Strugg
I believe we've proved enough and there's no need for us to prove over and over again what we have already proven and will continue to do what we do the best. We stood the test of time and will continue to carry on what we believe in. We have not just simply come about 762 pages on a thread with nothing you know.
Warm Regards,
~SoopY~
Thank you very much mate for your kind appreciation of our hard work mate as well as your suggestions and ideas in strengthening this coin , this is what keeps us going you , the community and everyone supporting us and encouraging us in everyway.
Thank you so very much.
Warm Regards,
~SoopY~
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
What problem do You have?
Besides web wallet, which delay we have been discussing and explaining a few times already, what else have been missed?
Multipool is live now - just like announced.
Redesign will start by the end of this week - just like announced.
Sorry, but You sound like You just want to spread negativity.
Regards
~ Strugg
Sure, I agree, it's pretty simple.
@everyone: Keep in mind that all developments are paid in full by our personal funds.
We did not have IPO/Premine/Instamine or any other financial support.
There were very few donations from some of our dear supporters.
But these people, who argue the most ("do more, do faster, do something else") never donated a single $.
If You want to see something done - give something from yourself and help.
If You don't want to do that - just let us do our work and stop fudding.
Simple as that.
Regards
~ Strugg
I believe we've proved enough and there's no need for us to prove over and over again what we have already proven and will continue to do what we do the best. We stood the test of time and will continue to carry on what we believe in. We have not just simply come about 762 pages on a thread with nothing you know.
Warm Regards,
~SoopY~
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
What problem do You have?
Besides web wallet, which delay we have been discussing and explaining a few times already, what else have been missed?
Multipool is live now - just like announced.
Redesign will start by the end of this week - just like announced.
Sorry, but You sound like You just want to spread negativity.
Regards
~ Strugg
Sure, I agree, it's pretty simple.
@everyone: Keep in mind that all developments are paid in full by our personal funds.
We did not have IPO/Premine/Instamine or any other financial support.
There were very few donations from some of our dear supporters.
But these people, who argue the most ("do more, do faster, do something else") never donated a single $.
If You want to see something done - give something from yourself and help.
If You don't want to do that - just let us do our work and stop fudding.
Simple as that.
Regards
~ Strugg
I believe we've proved enough and there's no need for us to prove over and over again what we have already proven and will continue to do what we do the best. We stood the test of time and will continue to carry on what we believe in. We have not just simply come about 762 pages on a thread with nothing you know.
Warm Regards,
~SoopY~
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
What problem do You have?
Besides web wallet, which delay we have been discussing and explaining a few times already, what else have been missed?
Multipool is live now - just like announced.
Redesign will start by the end of this week - just like announced.
Sorry, but You sound like You just want to spread negativity.
Regards
~ Strugg
Sure, I agree, it's pretty simple.
@everyone: Keep in mind that all developments are paid in full by our personal funds.
We did not have IPO/Premine/Instamine or any other financial support.
There were very few donations from some of our dear supporters.
But these people, who argue the most ("do more, do faster, do something else") never donated a single $.
If You want to see something done - give something from yourself and help.
If You don't want to do that - just let us do our work and stop fudding.
Simple as that.
Regards
~ Strugg
Agreed. Sometimes people just forget that nobody owns anyone a damn thing just because they happened to buy some coins.
Does the setback on the web wallet affect the mobile wallet as well?
In other words, is the mobile wallet release dependent on previous work done on the web wallet or are the projects completely separate?
Does the setback on the web wallet affect the mobile wallet as well?
In other words, is the mobile wallet release dependent on previous work done on the web wallet or are the projects completely separate?
No Mobile Wallet will settle on Webwallet. So you have one wallet everywhere.
ps: so yes it is dependent
Agreed. Sometimes people just forget that nobody owns anyone a damn thing just because they happened to buy some coins.
Does the setback on the web wallet affect the mobile wallet as well?
In other words, is the mobile wallet release dependent on previous work done on the web wallet or are the projects completely separate?
Does the setback on the web wallet affect the mobile wallet as well?
In other words, is the mobile wallet release dependent on previous work done on the web wallet or are the projects completely separate?
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
What problem do You have?
Besides web wallet, which delay we have been discussing and explaining a few times already, what else have been missed?
Multipool is live now - just like announced.
Redesign will start by the end of this week - just like announced.
Sorry, but You sound like You just want to spread negativity.
Regards
~ Strugg
Sure, I agree, it's pretty simple.
@everyone: Keep in mind that all developments are paid in full by our personal funds.
We did not have IPO/Premine/Instamine or any other financial support.
There were very few donations from some of our dear supporters.
But these people, who argue the most ("do more, do faster, do something else") never donated a single $.
If You want to see something done - give something from yourself and help.
If You don't want to do that - just let us do our work and stop fudding.
Simple as that.
Regards
~ Strugg
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
What problem do You have?
Besides web wallet, which delay we have been discussing and explaining a few times already, what else have been missed?
Multipool is live now - just like announced.
Redesign will start by the end of this week - just like announced.
Sorry, but You sound like You just want to spread negativity.
Regards
~ Strugg
I don't have a problem, just some of the dev posts are hard to understand, so I asked an honest question.
My opinion: Do the work, the community will follow. It's clear from posts that there are a lot of excited investors. So devs, just do the work and we will throw the money. Not complicated in that way.
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
What problem do You have?
Besides web wallet, which delay we have been discussing and explaining a few times already, what else have been missed?
Multipool is live now - just like announced.
Redesign will start by the end of this week - just like announced.
Sorry, but You sound like You just want to spread negativity.
Regards
~ Strugg
i think the DEVs team doing their job good, more or less
it's depends on us how to react to the market and in this thread
it is what it is, if i like this circumstances and believe it'll going to be better, i definitely do more investing and if i not, i will sell until the last coin and leave, so please don't complain about the time and ...
just remember, this coin was almost dead and they brought it back to life and put some value on it
it's depends on us how to react to the market and in this thread
it is what it is, if i like this circumstances and believe it'll going to be better, i definitely do more investing and if i not, i will sell until the last coin and leave, so please don't complain about the time and ...
just remember, this coin was almost dead and they brought it back to life and put some value on it
thank you for the explanations soopy and shahim. I understand your position on that matter (audit) and respect it.
You are right that this audit will cost a lot.
Perhaps the best thing to do will be to bring back the bounty for testing the next decentralized anon (and finding leaks, if any), like you did when anon was first released?
You guys are doing a great job and I can't wait to see what's next
You are right that this audit will cost a lot.
Perhaps the best thing to do will be to bring back the bounty for testing the next decentralized anon (and finding leaks, if any), like you did when anon was first released?
You guys are doing a great job and I can't wait to see what's next
I agree with you, it's a good idea.
thank you for the explanations soopy and shahim. I understand your position on that matter (audit) and respect it.
You are right that this audit will cost a lot.
Perhaps the best thing to do will be to bring back the bounty for testing the next decentralized anon (and finding leaks, if any), like you did when anon was first released?
You guys are doing a great job and I can't wait to see what's next
You are right that this audit will cost a lot.
Perhaps the best thing to do will be to bring back the bounty for testing the next decentralized anon (and finding leaks, if any), like you did when anon was first released?
You guys are doing a great job and I can't wait to see what's next
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
Why do you think so? No they are not meaningless.
But it could ends like always, with huge delay and nothing else.
Really dont get me wrong, im not fudding, im investor, but as u said that u are working on projects in the same time so why when u had problems with web wallet u didnt released anything else?
until now Webwallet and corresponding mobile wallet is delayed, because of reasons explained one page ago. Multipool was an Ann yesterday. All other points are in timeplan until now and are under constructions from
Hello All,
Let me answer you guys straight and once for all.
We've open NAVAJO ANON to the public on March and Beta since January , people tested it , we even had a bounty up for someone finding a loophole at that time , it has been proven over and over again that NavajoCoin Anonymity are beyond bounds and and unbreakable.
There's only 4 people on this planet and universe knowing how the system works and that's the team and I trust them with my life , I do not want another one out of it knowing it , for the sole reason that We currently do not entrust anyone outside of the team be it independent reviewer or what so ever with our technology and if this isn't good on you , I do not know what it is , yourselves as investors should be concerned when the technology would be put out and that its competitive advantage being endangered. It is you the community and the investors should be thoughtful about this more and be serious about it , please do think about it. Just because you want to capitalize on NAV's price going up and make a few btc , would you give out the competitive advantage? NavajoCoin prices are stable since the last few months and the only way from here is up and our journey is a stable one , we are not here to run on the same marathon that others do and get themselves off a cliff , our path is of stability and long term , you guys as investors should be more responsible in making such statements just to profit it from for just once , we are talking much more than a few btc here , you'll see when you see it.
And if some people are trying to fud regards to the same topic while bringing it out of the blue and trying to capitalize on the same , I strongly condemn their actions too on behalf of the Dev Team and as the Head Developer , please do not disrupt NavajoCoin and its march forward , but strengthen it with all your heart.
And also even if we were to go for a code review , it wouldn't be as simple as said , closed-code reviews are quite expensive and last time we quoted more than 6000 EUR and they are not done simply for 1 or 2 btc , which as we all know we cannot afford at this stage of the coin.
So this is out of the question , at least at this stage of NavajoCoin
Warm Regards,
~SoopY~
Maybe we should start a poll with who is willing to donate to this should be be easy to crowd fund 6g's of loot, I think a lot a ppl would donate 25-50$ Let me answer you guys straight and once for all.
We've open NAVAJO ANON to the public on March and Beta since January , people tested it , we even had a bounty up for someone finding a loophole at that time , it has been proven over and over again that NavajoCoin Anonymity are beyond bounds and and unbreakable.
There's only 4 people on this planet and universe knowing how the system works and that's the team and I trust them with my life , I do not want another one out of it knowing it , for the sole reason that We currently do not entrust anyone outside of the team be it independent reviewer or what so ever with our technology and if this isn't good on you , I do not know what it is , yourselves as investors should be concerned when the technology would be put out and that its competitive advantage being endangered. It is you the community and the investors should be thoughtful about this more and be serious about it , please do think about it. Just because you want to capitalize on NAV's price going up and make a few btc , would you give out the competitive advantage? NavajoCoin prices are stable since the last few months and the only way from here is up and our journey is a stable one , we are not here to run on the same marathon that others do and get themselves off a cliff , our path is of stability and long term , you guys as investors should be more responsible in making such statements just to profit it from for just once , we are talking much more than a few btc here , you'll see when you see it.
And if some people are trying to fud regards to the same topic while bringing it out of the blue and trying to capitalize on the same , I strongly condemn their actions too on behalf of the Dev Team and as the Head Developer , please do not disrupt NavajoCoin and its march forward , but strengthen it with all your heart.
And also even if we were to go for a code review , it wouldn't be as simple as said , closed-code reviews are quite expensive and last time we quoted more than 6000 EUR and they are not done simply for 1 or 2 btc , which as we all know we cannot afford at this stage of the coin.
So this is out of the question , at least at this stage of NavajoCoin
Warm Regards,
~SoopY~
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
Why do you think so? No they are not meaningless.
But it could ends like always, with huge delay and nothing else.
Really dont get me wrong, im not fudding, im investor, but as u said that u are working on projects in the same time so why when u had problems with web wallet u didnt released anything else?
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
Why do you think so? No they are not meaningless.
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
This is is, i just dont get why they put ~timeframes when they are not binding.Anyway we should have some ideas to spread informations about coin, and get more and more investors.
Ok now I'm confused. Not talking fud but there are timings in the roadmap. Are the timings meaningless?
It was explained the reason for the delay.
Let us show a little patience and confidence for the team.
Jump to: