Author

Topic: ★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!! - page 568. (Read 2085654 times)

legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
Hashforce101,

You're such pathetic rabid shill. I haven't said anything negative about Navajocoin per se YET. You wait until I get hard evidence.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10912138

So your not angry with kalimsky with a forged account , take it on the chine - we all make mistakes   Cheesy

Okidoki

Will there be a review of this coins anonymous features?

I think there should be 3rd party validation. All the best projects pull in a cryptographer to dissect the code and give an analysis.
I'll put BTC towards one.

Any news on 3rd Party testing the Anon?
DEV TEAM DO NOT NEED ANY HASSLE FROM YOU OR ANYBODY.
If you want third party testing NAVAJOCOIN, you better hire them yourself.
Isn't there a way to validate without DEVs giving out too much personal information?
DEVs are normal people, probably holding ordinary jobs, but trying to get a second income - they do not need unwanted exposure that could spill into the real world. You know the stigma still attached to cryptos, this is why we remain anonymous on this forum.

legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
BitCredits is a seriously amazing coin.. was on 200sats few weeks ago.. closed last night on 4500 sats now just below 3k sats.. this coin gave me great rewards.. all in 30btc volume.. sorry to say but wish nav was like this.. it took nav a 200btc volume just to go up by 1500 sats  Huh
This coin has too much FUD and EVIL HANDS, even after the DEVs put all their effort into it.
member
Activity: 373
Merit: 10
The World’s First Blockchain Core
The last of the original 29 Navajo Code Talkers of World War II has died. Chester Nez, died this morning of kidney failure at the age of 93. http://[Suspicious link removed]/1ktnTwk

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/arizona/2014/06/04/arizona-navajo-code-talker-dies-nez/9965201/
member
Activity: 373
Merit: 10
The World’s First Blockchain Core
The last of the original 29 Navajo Code Talkers of World War II has died. Chester Nez, died this morning of kidney failure at the age of 93. http://[Suspicious link removed]/1ktnTwk
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
Hashforce101,

You're such pathetic rabid shill. I haven't said anything negative about Navajocoin per se YET. You wait until I get hard evidence.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10912138

So your not angry with kalimsky with a forged account , take it on the chine - we all make mistakes   Cheesy

Okidoki

Will there be a review of this coins anonymous features?

I think there should be 3rd party validation. All the best projects pull in a cryptographer to dissect the code and give an analysis.
I'll put BTC towards one.

Any news on 3rd Party testing the Anon?
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Hashforce101,

You're such pathetic rabid shill. I haven't said anything negative about Navajocoin per se YET. You wait until I get hard evidence.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10912138

So your not angry with kalimsky with a forged account , take it on the chine - we all make mistakes   Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
Hashforce101,

You're such pathetic rabid shill. I haven't said anything negative about Navajocoin per se YET. You wait until I get hard evidence.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10912138
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002

Webwallet Will not stake! Simple when I want to have coins mobile for payment it would be bad to want to pay but coins are in stake and needs to get 60 confirmation.

OK! Thanks for reply.

Anyway... to avoid this exist the command reservebalance. Wink

Bye Bye

PS2:
News regarding Cryptsy?

Hi,

Oh an i forgot. For using enableaccounts / accounting you have to turn staking off.  Stop now Wink

Cryptsy closed the ticket but navajocoin still in maintenance.  I think they did.update but did not activated deposit and withdrawal...  Like last time.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Good Night
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Wow look at the buys coming back @BittrexExchange
full member
Activity: 208
Merit: 100

In addition to the web wallet, how about a light wallet too in the future?

Something similar to multibit for bitcoin.

I don't know how it works, I think it only downloads stuff that it needs instead of the entire chain but it syncs from zero to current very fast.

Then we would not need those constant downloads of 600MB (and later GB) blockchains

that sounds like a windows frontend for a webwallet. How else should this work? Do you know that?


hey Shahim

i have a idea if you can make a code in the wallet what will only save the tranaction on the blockchain like for 4, 5 days of let we say for one week the you will not have a blockchain like 1 gb or more.

sorry for me english Smiley

yust pick 50000 k more navajocoins.

some of you see it wil go up some one says it wil go down i have faith in the navajocoin dev team man do you guys know when the got heckd on bittrex like 2 000 000 coins gon most of the devs will olso go make a new scam coin a day later a new one one and so an.

but the continued to make the best of it respect for that...

gr

legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
I am working on a new business model something that has not been scene before. Does not require updates to come out to deliver profits Cheesy  .This can be done to Anonymous Network running successfully currently
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502

Webwallet Will not stake! Simple when I want to have coins mobile for payment it would be bad to want to pay but coins are in stake and needs to get 60 confirmation.

OK! Thanks for reply.

Anyway... to avoid this exist the command reservebalance. Wink

Bye Bye

PS2:
News regarding Cryptsy?
legendary
Activity: 1082
Merit: 1002
Just tried to build headless daemon and getting an error, really strange:

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2747  

Code:
navajocoind: main.cpp:2747: bool LoadBlockIndex(bool): Assertion `block.hashMerkleRoot == uint256("f326781ac9e04c00d914424402e0ee4e4aee7188e9059e5d745a05b634c8fee9")' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

I think that dev should fix this.

Email Soopy - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=158610

DOne, thanks.


Old story, 2.0.6 wallet fails to recreate the genesis block, due to new internal format.

If you hurry, as for QT Wallet you can upload the archive with the blockchain done by Shahim
and it should be in the OP.

Or you could use a simple 1 line quickfix, very unofficial, here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10743779

But to load the entire blockchain we could put quite a bit, in my case roughly 30 hours.



HI this already in work progress! We hope we can deliver an update next week.

btw. we are also in work of setting up a webwallet together with IOS and Android apps. I have found a webdeveloper doing this.


Good.

Could you give us any spoilers, what kind of fix you are thinking, for example
1) a simple external script or batch  to rename the dir and file.conf if necessary and
load the archive of blockchain before the first launch of the wallet,
2) a patch in the wallet code which load the entire blockchain at first start,
3) a patch which will make a series of partial automatic uploads of large segments
of blockchain as from your old idea?


BTW The webwallet will be able to produce stake?


Bye Bye



Hi,

Soopy is doing this fix.

Webwallet Will not stake! Simple when I want to have coins mobile for payment it would be bad to want to pay but coins are in stake and needs to get 60 confirmation.
hero member
Activity: 1194
Merit: 502
Just tried to build headless daemon and getting an error, really strange:

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2747  

Code:
navajocoind: main.cpp:2747: bool LoadBlockIndex(bool): Assertion `block.hashMerkleRoot == uint256("f326781ac9e04c00d914424402e0ee4e4aee7188e9059e5d745a05b634c8fee9")' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

I think that dev should fix this.

Email Soopy - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=158610

DOne, thanks.


Old story, maybe 2.0.6 wallet fails to recreate the genesis block, due to new internal format.

If you hurry, as for QT Wallet you can try to upload the archive with the blockchain done by Shahim
and it should be in the OP.

Or you could use a simple 1 line quickfix, very unofficial, here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10743779

But to load the entire blockchain we could put quite a bit, in my case roughly 30 hours.



HI this already in work progress! We hope we can deliver an update next week.

btw. we are also in work of setting up a webwallet together with IOS and Android apps. I have found a webdeveloper doing this.


Good.

Could you give us any spoilers, what kind of fix you are thinking, for example
1) a simple external script or batch  to rename the dir and file.conf if necessary and
load the archive of blockchain before the first launch of the wallet,
2) a patch in the wallet code which load the entire blockchain at first start,
3) a patch which will make a series of partial automatic uploads of large segments
of blockchain as from your old idea?


BTW The webwallet will be able to produce stake?


Bye Bye


PS:
Any news from Cryptsy maintainer?

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 500
I bought in bid order at @2500s some from this bot and some maybe from shaked weak hands. On bittrex.
I bought what I want. Now wait for moon.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
That BOT  is tricky - shaken the weeks hands now buying up
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1006
dream.... Huh Huh Huh

Dreams come true ...
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1006

Do you have already chosen the color of your Lamborghini?




Soon we say goodbye low price NAV .

Now is the last moment to buy cheap coins - Anon works great  !


Large investors and whales invest huge money soon !

Learn more about the technology Anon:

http://navajocoin.org/files/navajo_whitepaper_march2015.pdf
legendary
Activity: 2165
Merit: 1002
In addition to the web wallet, how about a light wallet too in the future?

Something similar to multibit for bitcoin.

I don't know how it works, I think it only downloads stuff that it needs instead of the entire chain but it syncs from zero to current very fast.

Then we would not need those constant downloads of 600MB (and later GB) blockchains

that sounds like a windows frontend for a webwallet. How else should this work? Do you know that?

I don't know how it works, but it is opensource so you can have a look

https://multibit.org/index.html

I really doubt it is dependent on web wallets because I cannot find any such info and nothing in its usage shows something like that
Jump to: